Tokugawa Ieyasu And Putin: The Centralization Of Power
The centralization of power and the suppression of dissent are common tactics used by leaders to legitimize their authority and maintain their hold on power. Two leaders who exemplify this trend are Tokugawa Ieyasu, the founder and first shogun of the Tokugawa shogunate of Japan, and Vladimir Putin, the current President of Russia. Despite coming to power under somewhat similar circumstances and facing similar challenges in consolidating their authority, the methods used by Ieyasu and Putin to centralize power and suppress conflict were significantly different, reflecting the unique cultural and political contexts in which they operated.
To centralize power, Ieyasu relied on military force and political maneuvering to suppress rival samurai
…show more content…
Ieyasu used military force and political maneuvering to establish the shogunate as the dominant power in Japan and co-opt cultural and religious institutions, while Putin relied on propaganda and control over the legal system to centralize power and suppress dissent within Russia. Putin has also used military force to assert Russian control over Crimea and other regions and prioritized the maintenance of Russian influence over its neighbors. These differences reflect the unique contexts and priorities of Ieyasu's and Putin's respective …show more content…
Ieyasu faced significant opposition from rival samurai clans and had to use military force and political maneuvering to suppress these challenges and establish the shogunate as the dominant power in Japan. Once he had consolidated his power, Ieyasu was able to maintain control through a combination of military force, co-optation of cultural and religious institutions, and the promotion of a culture of obedience and loyalty to the shogunate. In contrast, Putin has faced less direct opposition to his rule, but has had to contend with a more complex and diverse media landscape and a more entrenched legal and judicial system. As a result, he has relied more heavily on propaganda and control over the legal and judicial system to centralize power and suppress dissent within Russia. These differences reflect the unique contexts and levels of opposition faced by Ieyasu and Putin, and demonstrate that their methods for centralizing power and suppressing dissent were more different than
Comparison Of Tokugawa Ieyasu And Vladimir Putin
653 Words | 3 PagesOne major factor that contributed to these differences was the historical and cultural context in which each leader operated. Ieyasu lived in a time of great upheaval and change in Japan, and he relied on a combination of military force and political maneuverings, such as establishing a centralized government and a feudal system, to establish his authority and maintain control. On the other hand, Putin came to power in Russia at a time when the country was undergoing significant economic and political changes, and he has relied on military force and political repression to establish his authority and maintain control. These differences demonstrate the complex factors that can influence the methods used by leaders to establish and maintain their authority, and highlight the importance of considering the unique historical and cultural context in which a leader
Adolf Hitler DBQ
1240 Words | 5 PagesBetween World War I and World War II, there were various changes in leadership and power structures worldwide. Adolf Hitler, the Nazi leader of Germany, Vladimir Lenin communist leader of Russia; Benito Mussolini, the fascist dictator of Italy; Mohandas Gandhi, a political figure in India; and Emperor Meiji, the emperor of Japan during the Edo period, all of these people changed the power structure for their countries. For instance, Adolf Hitler, the Nazi fascist dictator of Germany and ex-chancellor, rose to power and brought effective measures to repair post-WWI Germany. There were many ways that these leaders demonstrated adequate power and authority: fear tactics, censorship, and the use of peace. Some of these methods of exerting control
Compare And Contrast Roosevelt And Woodrow Wilson
509 Words | 3 PagesAlthough he was recognized for aggressive foreign policies, he was a peacemaker. During the Russo-Japanese War, he
Ieyasu Research Paper
156 Words | 1 PagesTokugawa Leyasu was the first shogun of the Tokugawa shogunate. After Toyotomi Hideyoshi 's death, Hideyoshi had established a council of five regents, Tokugawa leyusu was part of this council. Another one of the advisers chosen by Hideyoshi was Ishisa Mitsunari. The two main people who had rivalry for power was Totyomi and Ishisa Mitsunari. Ieyasu 's victory over the western daimyo at the Battle of Sekigahara gave him complete control of all Japan and also provided him with more power.
The Issue Of Dehumanization In We The Living And Anthem, By Ayn Rand
1335 Words | 6 PagesBy suppressing his opposition and taking advantage of others, Vladmir Putin has weakened the citizens of Russia. It is said that, “He manipulates the public consciousness like a talented conductor…” (Gromenko). Putin has dehumanized residents of Russia in countless ways, including his harassment of activists, censorship of the media, assassinations of journalists, etc. While Russia has been sufficiently prosperous over the years, its society lacks individuality and basic freedoms due to the conformity Putin encourages. Russians’ hopes and aspirations are crushed if they do not fit Putin’s
Ieyasu Legacy
629 Words | 3 PagesBy using a particularly positive painting to create the profile, the author has allowed the reader to see that they see Ieyasu’s legacy as one of prosperity. The article goes on to discuss the shogun’s love for the art of falconry, his success in politics, allowing him to build the Tokugawa Shogunate and his use of Chinese influence in his rule of Japan. This piece puts forth many points of particular note. Including Ieyasu’s affinity to Chinese influence, especially in regards to governance, and his
A Brief Review Of Thucydides 'Athenian Demagogues'
1536 Words | 7 PagesHe also had a meteoric rise to power and utilized a profuse amount of propaganda. A third, and related to Donald Trump, is Vladimir Putin’s Russia. While Putin hides behind the alternating titles of president or prime minister, he also exemplified the characteristics of a demagogue until he infiltrated the government and currently leads a fascist state. These demagogues tell the story of what can happen when democracy is
Joseph Stalin Dbq
619 Words | 3 PagesPost WWl, Russia was still not industrialized, suffering economically and politically and in no doubt in need of a leader after Lenin’s death. “His successor, Joseph Stalin, a ruthless dictator, seized power and turned Russia into a totalitarian state where the government controls all aspects of private and public life.” Stalin showed these traits by using methods of enforcement, state control of individuals and state control of society. The journey of Stalin begins now.
Ito Hirobumi's Assassination Of Japan
993 Words | 4 PagesConsequently, Ito decided to meet up with Vladimir Kokovstov, the Russian Minister of Finance, in Harbin, China, to explain his intentions in Korea and to get Russia’s approval for Japan to annex Korea. Not only would they discuss this, but they also wanted to discuss the interests both countries had in the Far East
Russian Revolution Dbq
235 Words | 1 PagesBut Russia had lost their commander to his flagship blown up by the mine in 1904. Since Japan had won it had shown major world power. Since for Russia, the empire had lost all its prestige’s and the population of Russia had let into an outrage and so the Russian Revolution began in 1905. For Japan, they had destroyed Russia as a competitor in the East for 30 years. Japan then was bought
How Did Tokugawa Ieyasu Maintain Power In Japan
483 Words | 2 PagesTokugawa Ieyasu feared that westerners would colonize Japan bringing their culture into Japan and Tokugawa did not want another person to overthrow him as shogun so he had ways of maintaining his power. Some of the ways were, keeping Japan isolated, taxing the peasant farmers, military strength, and fear, he created such a strong shogunate that no one would dare to challenge him or his descendants.
Vladimir Putin Ethical Leadership
1070 Words | 5 PagesI covered how Putin’s visionary leadership traits ignored key aspects of diversimilarity and show how he was methodical in planning and executing is objectives. I also demonstrated how his drive for success and a lack of open-mindedness made him an unethical leader. Finally, I reflected on my own leadership as it pertains to these lesson principles, and my pursuit to continue growing as a self-aware leader. Perhaps there would be no Russia, as we currently know it, without Putin”, certainly he has shaped his country and has effected countless lives and treasure. Influential Russian author, Fyodor Dostoevsky might have foreshadowed such a leader as Putin in his book The Brothers Karamazov: “He understood very well that for the meek soul of a simple Russian, exhausted by grief and hardship and, above all, by constant injustice and sin, there was no stronger need than to find a holy shrine or a saint to prostrate himself before to worship”.
Cultural Diplomacy In Japan
910 Words | 4 PagesThe soft power is increasingly important in the international relations. It can improve the influence of a country and indirectly his economic and political power. The culture in all his manifestations, history, tradition and social customs form his base. Japan, with his culture, has a solid base on which soft power can be built. The Japanese art has impressed the lovers of the art in Europe and North America since more than 150 years.
Vladimir Putin's Leadership Analysis
779 Words | 4 PagesThrough his role model of a true leader and his great charisma he influenced the Russian citizens to contribute towards his vision of a greater Russia. Vladimir Putin is seen, as a strong leader with brilliant psychological skills that had the power and will to make the decisions and take crazy risks, which he thought, was right for Russian citizens. He was highly people oriented since he new the culture and came from the same background as many Russian individuals and he new what they exactly needed and wanted in a president. But on the contrary his management background helped him to direct and control the Russian citizens by coordinating and harmonizing them to accomplish a mutual goal that was based on their needs and wants. Vladimir Putin created strategies, policies based on the Russian culture, values and views.
Personalist Regime
1295 Words | 6 PagesIn our War and World Politics class, we have looked extensively at the ways in which leaders play a role in interstate conflict ranging from roles in national interest to how their beliefs and backgrounds affect the domestic and international political arena. One area that stood out to our group in particular was the section on authoritarian regimes and the initiation of conflict. Jessica Weeks’ research on the issue provides four classifications of authoritarian regimes that are organized by type of institution (personalist vs ruling elite) and type of leader/audience (military or civilian). From these divisions arose four main categories of nondemocratic institutions: the Boss, the Strongman, the Machine, or the Junta. Further, Weeks researched
More about Tokugawa Ieyasu And Putin: The Centralization Of Power
Comparison Of Tokugawa Ieyasu And Vladimir Putin
653 Words | 3 PagesAdolf Hitler DBQ
1240 Words | 5 PagesCompare And Contrast Roosevelt And Woodrow Wilson
509 Words | 3 PagesIeyasu Research Paper
156 Words | 1 PagesThe Issue Of Dehumanization In We The Living And Anthem, By Ayn Rand
1335 Words | 6 PagesIeyasu Legacy
629 Words | 3 PagesA Brief Review Of Thucydides 'Athenian Demagogues'
1536 Words | 7 PagesJoseph Stalin Dbq
619 Words | 3 PagesIto Hirobumi's Assassination Of Japan
993 Words | 4 PagesRussian Revolution Dbq
235 Words | 1 PagesHow Did Tokugawa Ieyasu Maintain Power In Japan
483 Words | 2 PagesVladimir Putin Ethical Leadership
1070 Words | 5 PagesCultural Diplomacy In Japan
910 Words | 4 PagesVladimir Putin's Leadership Analysis
779 Words | 4 PagesPersonalist Regime
1295 Words | 6 Pages