Multiculturalism is about values and norms and in what way society the diversity of values handles (Siim, 2007). Can you see assimilation as a kind of inclusion? You can doubt this, because don’t people always need to have a choice? If it is their choice to assimilate, that’s something else than being forced. The melting pot is, in my eyes, a very noble way to live together, but it also implies that every member of the society to needs to be open to new cultures, values and traditions.
Thirdly, the theory of pluralism is overly optimistic and therefore isn’t very useful. In reality many groups fail and in a truly pluralist democracy all groups would have a fair chance to succeed . Pluralism can’t exist when groups aren’t equal and although competition is a hallmark of pluralism only the groups whom have the most resources will win. Furthermore, this competition is usually by the elite pressure groups also known as competitive elitism a theory created by Schumpeter . An example of competitive elitism is the 2016 European union UK referendum.
There are some universal aspects of culture, but they often differ in countless other ways. In order for a perfect society to exist, everyone must get along with each other. Assimilation must be avoided so nobody losses what makes them unique. Ideally every culture would bring something unique to the table and live together in harmony. Not everyone can be so accepting yet though, so problems still exist.
Many of us consider religion universal and, this means, a significant institution of societies. It is the foundation on which the normative structure of society stands. Functions of religions have not changed for hundreds of centuries, despite the fact that now the majority of states are considered secular and formally religion has no influence on the life of civil society. It still manages and leads us. Religion encouraged
It includes people who have many different beliefs and customs. It could be something designed for cultures of different races. Multiculturalism is a philosophy that appreciates ethnic diversity within a society and that encourages people to learn about the contributions of those of diverse ethnic backgrounds. At Microsoft, we believe in diversity “Diversity of nationality, gender, sexual orientation, and most importantly diversity of thought”. (Mark, 2010) Multiculturalism is closely associated with “identity politics,” “the politics of difference,” and “the politics of recognition,” all of which share a commitment to revaluing disrespected identities and changing dominant patterns of representation and communication that marginalize certain groups (Gutmann, 2003).
A transcendentalist society seems like it would be perfect in this world. With all the hatred and judgment in the world, it seems like a transcendentalist society would help people throughout the world. Though the goal of a transcendentalist society might be impossible in today’s world. People for the most part have free will, so one cannot force another to be accepting and do not judge people. Also, the outside world and media are both very judgmental, and would have a great effect on how people feel about others.
There is bound to be clashes in a multicultural society as individual differences may not be embraced or tolerated by everyone. This can subsequently result in serious problems if religious groups start to pursue superiority among the religion. In a multi-cultural society, minor and major religions should ideally be treated equally to prevent any frictions between the groups but it is difficult to find a balance position. Religious harmony is especially important to preserve peace and respect in a multicultural society. A society with individual distinction yet collective harmony is sought
An inclusive and tolerant society refers to a community of people living together in a particular country without excluding anyone out and being open-minded about opinions that one does not necessarily agree with. Do you really think it is possible to have an inclusive and tolerant society based on the world we are living in today? That’s a question to ponder about. Nowadays, it is common to read news articles about fights between two different parties. It is not a rare sight and it is saddening to see people fighting due to the differences they have between themselves.
Secularism under Threat: The Case of Burkini Secularism in Europe is in danger and religious rights are being undermined with it. ! Secularism represents one of the main principles of today’s democracies and it can be defined as the principle which separates the state from religious institutions. However, I would like to point out that the principle has three major implications: firstly, the state ought not to discriminate against anybody practicing their religion, ; secondly, the state ought to remain neutral on religious matters and ; thirdly, the state ought not to give advantage to one religion over the another. As such, secularism remains an ideal to be pursued by democracies.
Today, many civilisations exist due to the assimilation of ideas and solutions from cooperating with other civilisations. For instance, the assimilation of knowledge between the west and the middle east allowed the evolution of many scientific fields during the renaissance and reformation period in Europe. Therefore, harmony within diversity should be nurtured and cherished for the good of mankind. Firstly, diversity breeds innovation. As the saying goes, “two heads are better than one”; eccentric and out of the box ideas are more likely to form during discussions among diverse-minded people compared to like-minded people due to the difference in: cognitive skills which are interpretation, perspective,