Tom Campbell's Idea Of Poverty As A Violation Of Human Rights

This demoralization can be seen within Jean-Joseph Goux’s Utility: Equivocation and Demoralization, in which he states that “These premises have the advantage of being clear. They set out from the beginning with an unambiguous affirmation of the axiological indifference of the notion of utility, and with a radical demoralization that goes far as to take a stance completely contrary to that of ordinary language” (Goux 12). Stating that utility and turning a blind eye to those struggling because the overall happiness is greater leads to demoralization and can have strong effects on a society that employs such an ideal; just as some of the characters in The March of Fools were demoralized to the hardships around them. However, Park Chung Hee would disagree that utility is the problem as in his work Our Nation’s Path, he says that “The fault does not always lie with the institution itself; it lies rather with the individuals who comprise and operate

By referring to what can we interpret it as inhumane? Is it inhumane when their intension is just to strive for survival and even a good intension? Concluding all questions, a knowledge questions of this essay will “How can inhumanity and depravity be recognised and categorised?”. Despite the fact that “inhumanity” and “depravity” can hardly be quantified and explained in exact terms, numbers or theories, but it can be recognised by common sense which I argue it is bounded by our environment, our upbringing and our culture. The act of inhumane can also be categorised by the laws we which can varies in different places with different background.

But,

First, he describes the "homeless, dust-streaked Haitian" in a pitying, but not condescending tone. His language also makes the reader feel sympathy for the victims; he uses words like "wretched" and "poor" to show how terrible this situation is. Furthermore, it makes the reader question why these people deserved their fate and why it was justified that they earned such a punishment. This sentence is important to the main point because it describes how life can be unfair. He also brings to mind some of the non-natural tragedies that have subverted this small nation: "...

Punishing individuals for wrongdoing is an ethical issue that is still current in modern day society. It can be argued that we need punishment for various different reasons. Without punishment, crimes would not be illegal and it would be hard to differ between what is right and what is morally wrong. Punishment highlights the need to focus on the consequences of our actions and show us what could happen if we go against the law. Punishment has the ability to make criminals better individuals through deterrence and rehabilitation.

Retributivism is the idea that one should be punished as one deserved, which is defined by one’s past actions. The principal of desert according to James Rachel is “The key idea is that people deserve to be treated in the same way that they voluntarily choose to treat others.” Philosophers such as Immanuel Kant also believe that punishment should be weighted by one’s past action.

The proponents of the theory see this move being necessary when human rights are violated and consider this move to be more essential than those of sovereignty, since their actions are strictly motivated by the human need (Stewart & Knaus, 2011). However, the theory has been criticized by its opponents, terming it as a false move that has not been sanctioned, and that is undertaken by a nation under the pretence of rendering humanitarian help but is only aimed at achieving ambiguous goals Chomsky,

715) Hearn further discusses that linking poverty and neglect would have political and social implications that make it difficult to address and that acknowledging that poverty and neglect are “intertwined” would create the need for “an intervention that would require a great deal of cost and a shift in ideology of many of those in positions to change policy and the way the system works with poor families.” (Hearn, 2011, pg. 716) Instead of focusing on the link between poverty and neglect often the cause of neglect is associated with other underlying issues, such as substance abuse or mental abuse. (Hearn, 2011, pg. 716) Hearn is not saying that these “issues are not fundamentally related to child neglect” (2011, pg. 716) but instead is concerned that they “may draw attention away from underlying factors (such as poverty) that also need to be addressed.”

Everyone should morally be treated fairly and with justice. “Today, given the worldwide dimension which the social question has assumed, this love of preference for the poor, and the decisions which it inspires in us, cannot but embrace the immense multitudes of the hungry, the needy, the homeless, those without medical care and, above all, those without hope of a better future”. - Pope Paul II What Catholic Social Teaching and Papal Statements are applicable to this issue and why?

Rawls’ conception of need and equality based justice is not satisfied by his principles of justice – his argument is consequentially invalid. While Jerry Cohen recognises that there are strengths within his argument, he objects to a Rawlsian conception of justice based on its failure to extend beyond the basic structure, its incorporation of incentives that undermine justice, and its failure to adequately describe the prerequisites for legitimate inequality without risk of abuse motivated by self-interest of the better

Class Stereotypes Stereotypes are seen as overgeneralized ideas, images, or beliefs of a person based on a group of people. Stereotypes can either be taken or said in a negative or positive way but mostly seen in a negative way. Stereotypes are formed on a life experience, idea or a belief a person may have towards one person based on the person’s gender, race, religion or social class. The most common stereotypes are of the social classes which are the: upper, middle and lower class.