Management style can effect morale, productivity and turnover. In the case, top-down management style in the kitchen does not seem to be the right way to manage their employees, because it causes the high annual labour turnover of 75% and low morale. To “Kaizen” the situation, one should know the right time to use top-down management style and implement other strategies to manage employees.
Top-down Management Style Top-down management style is also called “command-and-control” leadership. The results of effectiveness make this kind of management style a common strategy used extensively in the obedience-oriented Military and the industrialized period when most of the employees were low-wage and uneducated. Several advantages can be seen
…show more content…
Top-down distribution may be efficient in the beginning stage, but it would be vital in long term when it is not the suitable management style for employees; therefore, bottom-up exchange of ideas should be helpful to the organization. It is not only a useful tool to know employees’ needs and wants but an emotional comfort to employees, making them feel that they are involved and valued. However, conversation can fail to truly reflect employees’ real opinions when it is not carried on properly. To have an efficient conversation, there are several points supervisors should keep in mind when approaching to …show more content…
Moreover, to improve business performance and quality, some crucial points may only be seen from the front line.
• Take employees’ opinions sincerely: Something like “I’ll check into that and get back to you” which never happens should be avoid. If employees find it useless to have the conversation, they will refuse to give their real opinions, which will make the whole conversation system a hollow channel. Except for implementing conversation system, it is equally important for supervisors to find the management styles best suit their organization and employees. To achieve the goal, they should be able to:
• Know the organization culture: Organization culture can different from one to another; is it dictate or facilitate? Driven or lead? However, what organization culture shows is what the company always does, it does not necessarily mean this culture is always right. A good leader should be able to recognize what is the most suitable ways to manage the
This essay will examine the possible advantages and disadvantages of such a
Corporate culture is heavily dependent on the values and vision of the entrepreneur. It is very much related to the vision and mission statements of a company in how the company wants to be perceived by its stakeholders and how the company wants to achieve its visions. The entrepreneur is the one responsible in how the company conducts itself and therefore is the one responsible in setting the culture of the business. The behavior, actions, and interactions of the members of an organization emerge from the meaning that the reality of that organization has for them. Therefore, a good corporate culture is essential to creating a healthy and thriving workplace, where the workers an inspired to work for the good of the company.
INTRODUCTION: The summation of activities that a business expects to carry out in order to attain longstanding objectives can be defined as organizational strategy. Combined, these activities forms a business’s strategic plan. Strategic plans are developed by various level of management.
When the team’s performance expectations are met, there should be rewards and recognitions so as to encourage them to continue their great performance. Nonetheless, since performance is link to remunerations, team members might feel competitive and hence resort to unethical ways in order to achieve their targets. Alternatively, attending leadership training to improve leadership skills and to upgrade the current skills can be done. With that, the manager will have the knowledge on how to communicate, guide and motivate his team to achieve their goals.
“The study of history has been a study of leaders – what they did and why they did it” (Bass, 2008: 4). New contemporary styles of leadership have emerged that arguably are more successful in the long term (Dawson & Andriopoulos, 2014). This report critically evaluates different styles of leadership to determine if a transformational style will have a more decisive effect on employee motivation and organisational culture culminating in long term prosperity of the business. Fresh perspectives to leadership are required if organisations are to be successful in times of change while at the same time increasing employee morale (Conger, 1999). Studies done by Burns (1978) differentiates between transactional leaders and transformational leaders.
Contents Getting the timing right Case study 2 The Challenge of Management 2 Hills find millions in the backyard 3 Ford motors charges ahead into globalization 4 Turbosoft 5 Fuzz Eye 6 Transit New Zealand v. the Mystic Taniwha 6 Meeting the challenge of Labor shortage 7 Decision making and ChocCo 8 Reach the clouds 9 Strategy or Strategic Planning 9 Coming back to call back 10 Getting the timing right Case study 1. Identify what roles Joe Wong takes on at CCK. How do you think those roles have changed over past 20 years? Why have they done so?
Similarly, if a manager verbally says he is interested in the employee’s opinions but never creates a way for them to express their thoughts, this leads to confusion and frustration. When employees and co-workers are able to communicate effectively needs and listen, mutual trust develops that often leads to innovation in work. Therefore, it is important in every decision to encourage employees and coworkers to share opinions, ideas and thoughts and make them feel more part of team
However such standards can have both negative and positive influences. Reliance must be made according to various types of theories to interject a cohesive organization. Although subordinates may always negatively respond to management, and vic-versa, significant cohesive response needs to be made. Suitable enforcement must be constructed to correctly signify a suitable department. Additionally cohesive managerial leadership is crucial for a well incorporated department.
This deduces that in order for a strong feedback and criticisms to improve the sales, designs and innovations, team management leadership style is very important and useful, especially for a fashion related industry as productivity and quality is extremely significant. As such, employees need to engage with one another to improve the product and consequently yield the finest end product. This style also results in employees being motivated and forming a highly cohesive team which results in efficient and competent
There are many different definitions of workplace culture. Charles Handy an Irish author/philosopher specialising in Organisational Behaviour and Management famously said that, “Culture is the way we do things around here,” but if someone was on the outside looking in how would you explain that to them. Would you have to be working there a long time yourself before you could see “how things work around here”. Because culture in an organisation is what makes it unique, it’s the personality, the attitudes, and the way we interact and relate to each other these are the things that attract the best and Brightest talent to a company. So, if an organisation has a “strong, positive, clearly defined and well communicated culture with strong core values” (Deloitte) that company is onto a winner.
Bass and Avolio (1993) pointed out that leadership style is based on behavior areas from laissez-fair (no leadership) to participative (take inputs from subordinate but ultimate decision making with the leader) through transactional leadership (which depends on reward system and punishments) to transformational leadership (which is based on inspiration and behavioral charisma) and ultimately Autocratic leadership (absolute power on decision making). The researcher selected above approach since it has been developed recently and efficiently demonstrated through research findings. The various components are further elaborated below; 1. Laissez-fair Style Laissez-fair leaders are characterized as an avoidant leader who may uninvolved with their subordinates. As per Mondy and Premeaux (1995), these leaders let group members to make all decisions.
Mass Production 2. Top management’s style of leadership 3. Creating stable and certain
‘Organizations provide its managers with legitimate authority to lead, but there is no assurance that they will be able to lead effectively’ (Lunenburg, 2011). Organizational success usually requires a combination of both management and leadership. In today’s dynamic work environment, leaders are expected to challenge the present state of affairs, and to motivate and convince organization members. Managers are needed to assist in creating and maintaining a positive and well-functioning workplace. ‘Leadership and management are often considered practically overlapping concepts’ (Bohoris and Vorria, 2007, p. 1).
Organization Culture and Leadership Analysis Using Sociology Paradigm Introduction This study has described the organizational culture and leadership of my company. I analysis my company adopt the?functionalism Paradigm, which is one of the major theoretical perspectives in sociology. See below is sociological paradigm. This paradigm developed by Burrell and Morgan classifies sociological theories along the two orthogonal dimensions of regulation vs. change and subjectivity vs. objectivity (Burrell & Morgan, 1979).
Managers have to understand how to engage employees and be able to assist in their development by setting goals and expectations. Using the feedback Julia has received from executives helps her development as well. Being able to use the feedback she has received will assist her in developing employees. Communication is essential in the management role as well. Communicating expectations and holding not only the employee