Tort Vs Contract Case Study

Question 3 Tort is an omission or wrongful act that can obtained the harm or injury to the other party, reputation, property or the like and courts force the obligation with the amounts of civil wrong. (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/tort) The court will typically instruct the defendant to provide the relief or compensate the monetary compensation to the plaintiff when find that a tort has been submitted. The compensation for the plaintiff is generally to offset the damages. Tort are divided into three categorized which is Negligence Torts, Strict Liability Torts and International Torts. (http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-tort-and-vs-contract/) However, contract is a legally binding agreement with specific terms between two or more parties which is enforceable by law. The parties in the contract will intend to create the legal obligations and responsibilities to other parties with their promise to do or to refrain from doing something which will return with

In tort, the interaction is never in view of consent. Tort are generally include an interruption by one party into the profit, safety, protection of the victim or the health. Indeed, it can treat as defence that will keep them from recovering damages if the victim agrees to the tortious conduct. In the contract, the parties must go into an agreement wittingly and without being pressured. Each of the party must agree to the result of an agreement as expressed in the document to make the contract become valid. So, if one party without assent to enter into the contract, this imply that other party cannot coerce them go into the agreement. In this manner, damages in the contract demand often have to do with the misunderstanding or mistake between the parties in the contract, since they are normally aware of what they managing in the contract.