When he was doubted for his loyalty towards Gadgebaba, he argued for his secular attitude in the context of caste identity.
‘I have been never proud of my caste identity. I have never insulted anybody due to my birth in the particular caste. I have thrown away the concepts of touchability and untouchability. I have never decided to take food from particular persons. On the contrary, I have tried my best to crush down such mutiny. I have accepted abuses of many people for my efforts in this regard. ' (Dandekar 343)
Anand Yadav reflects the Non-Brahman attitude towards caste identity. His Maratha caste is located in between the hierarchy. It was below the Brahman and above the untouchable castes. His family was not in close affinity to Brahmans.
…show more content…
It gives control of the females to the males in the society. The rules of religion, caste and gender are set accordingly. The rules subdue women. They are detached from their social identity, economic freedom and political power. The women are not allowed to behave in the society without having the identity of the male members of their family. They are either recognised as a daughter, sister, wife or mother of some male member. The upper caste women are not allowed to work to get money so that they cannot have economic flexibility. They have fully depended on the males in their family for their economic position. They are intentionally prescribed domestic duties which have no economic status. The women cannot use their political power due the overpowering personalities of the male members in the society. The marriage system uprooted them from their natal house. They have to settle down at the in-laws. To some extent, the process detached their political power of existence. In the lack of it, they cannot defend themselves at their husband 's house. At the same time, they are forced to stay there by the male members from their natal house. They have to give birth to the male child. Their failure for the same remains a threat to their married state. If a husband is not calibre to earn for the household, the women have to work on the farm as unskilled
He saw it as positive action to take in the direction of correcting the social subordination of women (Bohan,
Instead of questioning the value of such a rite, he adheres to the custom mindlessly. He has become inured to it and no longer questions its utility. Furthermore, failure to discern the reasons behind traditions result in bigotry.
Societies were to keep women at home caring for the house chores and raising children. Women were denied the right to do any activity that require manual labor, decision making regardless of the social status. Women were excluded from juries and any legal training to the point they were out of the centered at court house. Women could not vote since “married or not, women were assumed to be dependent creatures by nature.” (Dumenil 120)
They are recognized that women has their own identity, and they are different with men. However, they challenged the society to change its structure to create a new society where women will have their rights in many sections like education, marriage, and
The women of the upper class, also known as elites, were pictured as the ones to carry the honor of the family, bear the children, and be presenters of purity. Many of these characteristics will carry over to the national period after independence. Mothers, daughters, and wives were seen as domestic stability within the households. However, it is a different story for women of poorer social status.
To sum up, more government authority was beneficial towards women but detrimental towards
As what Sir James Bentayao once said in our lecture, “The past is a good place to visit but not a good place to stay.” The past of how women are treated should not be the same as of now. Also, being free does not mean that we are totally free. What I am talking about in this paper is not to let women be totally free. What I mean is to let women choose what they really want without hurting or affecting other people.
Racial identity plays a role in the physical and psychological features of humans. Physically, humans in different parts of the globe endure different conditions and environments. Humans adapt to their environments and obtain different physical traits, henceforth, these physical traits have become adjacent to race. Psychologically, ancestral prejudices and influences throughout history have lingered through the generations and have impacted modern racial identities and tensions. Ethnic conflicts of the past such as the Social Darwinist theory of a "superior race" are morally refuted in current times, but that assumption had a brunt impact in which the world is still repairing today.
Laws gave men the power over women. They were expected to obey their male relatives and had few rights. Any disobedience is considered an offense to their religion. Women were not allowed to take any career. Their only job is to bear children and run the household.
They have no identity whatsoever. They are unable to choose their own paths. LIterally their whole life is predetermined, and then they are conditioned to have opinions similar to others in their caste. It is a lot easier to be appreciative of our world after
They controlled what the woman was able to do, how the woman was seen. Any rights that a woman had was mostly due to inheritance. The main method of women gaining any sort of power was through their sons, especially when the husband died. The husband had to put into writing what specifically the woman would own or it would
Some might argue that India’s Caste system is closely related to However, Caste and social hierarchy were more different because Caste happens over different lifetimes, and social hierarchy can happen over one. In the caste system people could move their position in their current life, however they could have moved up or down depending on how they acted in their last life. In the Social hierarchy, men could move up or down depending on whom they married, however women could not move throughout the chain. “Women were generally seen as inferior to men, dominated by their bodies rather than their minds.” (McKay pg
While identity focuses on uniqueness such as how an individual is different from and similar to others, diversity focuses on the range of the difference and uniqueness such as race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, age, physical abilities, religious beliefs, political beliefs, among others. Diversity should be seen as source of strength. However, it can also be a source of violence, oftentimes by those who fear or dislike difference. In the best light diversity is foundation for peacebuilding – since it enables us to draw strength and be respectful of difference. Identity and diversity are linked.
Injustice violence and inequality becomes the law. Women are not treated equally. Men treat women like trash or just like a doll or a servant. Men think that women are useful only to bear children, cook and clean. Men are treated as more important than women.
The social stigma that women are housekeepers and should be confined to the four walls of the house is perhaps a viable cause of gender disparity. They should not raise their voice regarding their fortune for the sake of the prestige of the family. In patriarchal society a lot of weightage is given to men.” The root cause of gender inequality in Indian society lies in its patriarchy system.