Cultural myths can also obstruct our way of thinking. When I was growing up, I view my family as the “model” of perfect family: my dad, my mom, and my siblings. This is a cultural myth because I believe the “model” family consist of those things. To other cultures, like in Asia, having your extended relatives living with you in the same house is part of their “model” family. It is very hard to overthrow these cultural myths we have when consider the way others raise a family.
Everyone has an opinion and different beliefs on almost every topic, in which one of the most controversial topics is adoption. In adoption, people believe that race matters due to their ethical or cultural beliefs; however race does not matter because every child needs a loving home. Additionally, studies of multiracial families show that kids are more aware of their culture, as well as they are more like the community around them, then their ethnic background. There are many adoption agencies, and others with the beliefs that kids need to be with parents of the same ethnicity because it would provide the child with more cultural awareness, as well as it would prevent children from the danger and backlash they might get from others. In
The Outsiders and Family Relationships One would think that conventional families are the most beneficial to a child’s mental, as well as physical health, but that is not always the case. There are many perfect parents, in every sense of the word, that have children that, well, aren’t good in people in general. Many unconventional families may also produce phenomenally great children. Sure, conventional families have more of an advantage in raising their kids, because they have the resources to do so, but there are exceptions. Think about Bob.
Although we are studying theories, some of them appear to explain human behavior and personality with certain accuracy. John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth theories of attachment can also explain what happens to people when attachment to their parents or caregivers is healthy or potential problems that could occur due to detachments. They suggest that individuals raised with secure attachments to their primary caregivers help them to feel secure; moreover, these children appear to be more socially skilled and less likely to experience major emotional disturbances. However, failure to form healthy attachments, especially mother-child, could serve as a descriptive mechanism for many negative psychological outcomes later in the life of an individual,
It means ensuring proper education for the children in the countries, and it means social support for the families who have the most problems. Consequently, in my opinion, this would help both sides of the problem long term. Conclusion The new immigration reform might be a suitable solution, but not a sustainable one. In addition to this, the American society is filled with different opinions on the matter. Furthermore, the illegal immigration might not be the worst thing to happen to a country, you just have to understand, what impact it would make if it weren’t there.
“And while parents’ support of their children’s gendered behavior is not always and certainly not simply a conscious effort at gender socialization, their behavior is probably more powerful than they think. Even parents who strive for gender equality, and who believe that they do not constrain their children’s behavior along gender lines, have been observed in experimental situations to do just that” (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet, 743). We all have experienced this process while growing into the common “big boys and big girls” (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet, 742). Parents are making the mistake of teaching their kids to act the way they should because of the genital body parts each are born with. It will just raise the issue of gender inequality more when they grow up.
Furthermore, it is possible that in mixed-gender families, the higher chances of comparisons between the two parents’ behaviours would reinforce specific ideas about gender roles than it would in families where parents are of the same gender (Endendijk et al., 2013). For example, it is often assumed in mixed-gender households that males are breadwinners of the family while females are caretakers, whereas in same-gender households, parents tend to be more open-minded about gender roles and do not necessarily subscribe to existing stereotypes (Sutfin, Fulcher, Bowles, & Patterson, 2008). Division of roles in terms of gender
But still, although scholars advocate the importance of female education for them the education of women was rather a sacrifice to ensure that sons would be raised right. With this, more young and unmarried women become teachers for girls’ schools which resulted in a higher literacy among females during the seventeenth century. Especially men decried the development of female education arguing that women would start to neglect their duties as a housewives, which was not necessarily true but many women understood that there was more than just the domestic life they led until
Determinants of childlessness may be found also in early life course experiences in the family, such as parental socio-economic status and birth order. Higher parental socioeconomic status has been found to be related to less coercive parenting styles with moderate to high levels of parental warmth, greater independence training, and a greater emphasis on achievement: all predictors of childlessness . These parenting styles are likely to foster greater independence and autonomy in children and the early development of an achievement identity versus a mothering identity, also found to predict childlessness. Explanation of religion in voluntary childlessness is infrequent as religious norms generally encourage high levels of fertility and traditional values, which can run counter to the values of a family with no children . Another study on childlessness stated that birth order, size of family of orientation, mother’s employment, or perceived parental happiness were not related to childlessness .
May suggest a status transmission theory. The parents’ schooling does play a significant role, however, only a small portion of its impact is meditated through the adult of the child’s schooling. Voting parents appear to be much more of a significant meditator. However, having a mother that votes is more likely consequential for the younger ladies. Rather than having a father that votes is consistent with the emphasizes that social teaching theory puts on.