Suppose that a man is sitting in a McDonalds and his 8-year-old daughter needs to use the restroom. Assuming that she can handle herself he lets her go, as she is walking to the restroom a 40 something year old potbellied man in a pink dress also starts walking towards the female restroom. Now if he gets up to stop this man he could be fined and in certain instances be arrested. Because of Title IX (9), if someone ‘identifies’ as a certain gender they can use the restroom that they identify as. This has risen major concerns around the country. The laws protecting Trans-rights and Title IX should be disbarred. This should be mostly because it is leading kids to believe that if they think differently, they should get some-sort of special treatment, …show more content…
It brings up the complication that if someone is not Trans and feels uncomfortable in their own restroom their discomfort is to be ignored. The biggest problem with this is that “If any of this makes a child uncomfortable, the administration's response is "too bad." According to the letter, a transgender student's discomfort must always be accommodated, but if another student feels similar discomfort, those concerns must always be ignored because the administration has pre-emptively deemed all "others' discomfort" unjustified. When a young female says she feels uncomfortable or even unsafe sharing bathrooms and locker rooms with males, she isn't being discriminatory, and her complaints shouldn't be dismissed as veiled bigotry by the same Education Department that has preached to schools the importance of creating environments where students feel secure.”(Pruitt) With Title IX, if a child feels uncomfortable about the other sex being in their restroom just because they identify as the opposite sex, their discomfort will be remarked as bigotry and will have to put up with it otherwise their school will lose funding. The comfort of some students is leading to the discomfort of a larger number of students and the government is saying “Get over it or you lose
In class, we have talked in to very good depth about the Title IX. The investigator found that the school’s efforts in implement Title IX were arranged, slow, and obstruct by a lack of engagement and support by senior leadership. Baylor University complies with Title IX, which doesn’t allow discrimination, sexual violence, or sexual harassment. Art Biles failed to follow this by not doing something about his player raping another female athlete. Briles is trying to find another coaching job at the moment
In the case, Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan, the respondent Joe Hogan, who attempted to enroll to the MUW’s School of Nursing, was denied admission (“Mississippi University for,” n.d.). The website, informs that the reason why he was denied enrollment for credit in the School of Nursing, is was created the controversy of whether the decision of the university was a violation to the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reached to a conclusion after analyzing deeply if the reason that the state had to deny enrollment to Hogan had a reasonable justification. The court’s decision could impact and create changes in the educational system in the Mississippi University
A statement by Congressman Jarred Polis of 2nd District of Colorado, “Equality before the law is an American value articulated in our Constitution.” However, LGBT people today are still being treated unfairly because they tend to be different. Congressman Polis is said to be strongly committed to ending this discrimination, which is why he came up with the term “Student Non-Discrimination Act.” It is to avoid all kinds of discrimination for the people who are part of LGBT community. It’s been proven that discrimination is a cause for the students to skip school and to harm
Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education 2005 Kirsten Dooley Liberty High School AP Government 2A Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education was a U.S. Supreme Court case surrounding sex discrimination and people who face retaliation for trying to uphold Title IX of the Education Amendments. Roderick Jackson was a high school girls’ basketball coach at Ensley High school that was fired after complaining that his team was denied equal treatment as far as funding and access to equipment. Jackson sued for retaliation, and the case would be heard in the Supreme Court in 2005. This case was important in deciding that those who are retaliated against for arguing sex discrimination, even though they may not have faced it themselves,
Last summer, I was afforded the opportunity to take a three-day class on Title IX in Intercollegiate Athletics hosted by a former employee of the Office of Civil Rights, Ms. Valerie Bonnette. The class opened my eyes to the basic fundamentals of Title IX, key issues on college campuses and what I could do to make an immediate impact on the campus of Hampton University. The class broke down the understanding of the three prong test and with the recent additions of Women’s Soccer and Men’s Lacrosse. In addition to understanding Title IX’s effects on scholarships, budget, facilities and most importantly female student-athletes.
"This case presents the difficult issue of balancing the protection of students ' rights and that of personal privacy ... while ensuring that no student is unnecessarily marginalized while attending school," the judge wrote. The court order said that "Defendants are enjoined from enforcing the Guidelines against Plaintiffs and their respective schools, school boards, and other public, educationally-based institutions. Further, while this injunction remains in place, Defendants are enjoined from initiating, continuing, or concluding any investigation based on Defendant ' interpretation that the definition of sex includes gender identity in Title IX 's prohibition against discrimination on the basis of
The policies of Title IX is a problem that has been an issue pushed under the rug for years and it needs to be revised. Men’s teams shouldn’t have to be cut, all it takes is changes within the universities and a public voice. Spreading the word about Title IX and the negative effects will open the eyes of politicians, courts, and the universities. If everyone started a trend on social media and put pressure on the colleges, they could make a plan to reverse the negative effects. Challenging and changing the impurities of Title IX won’t make genders’ in athletics unequal, but balanced and ultimately just.
Based on the numerous examples exhibited each and every day on the field and off the field in America, it is clear Title IX has fallen short of its purpose. The Act states, in part, “No person shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any academic, extracurricular, research, occupational training, or other education program or activity operated by a recipient which receives Federal financial assistance…” (Parameswaran). Therefore, the goals of the bill were to create an atmosphere of equality for men and women.
Finally, one of the issues with the cases made against Title IX is that these sentiments are one-sided. A hefty portion of the articles that condemn the impact of Title IX on men 's athletic fields originated from the one, particularly male whose life was directly affected by the removal of his desire sports in the list of college sports. This was illustrated by Michael Lancaster in the article of “Title IX Laws and Intercollegiate Athletics.” In this composition, he writes about the elimination of track and field at Nicholls State University that later caused his scholarship to be cut (Lancaster). The issue with this article is that Lancaster himself was one of the athletes who were being victimized in the name of Title IX.
Title IX has had a greater impact than just on the playing field, and other areas. Have you ever heard of the impact Title IX has had on the field? But have you ever heard of the impact it 's had on science, college campuses or even with sexual harassment? The first thing we 'll have to figure out would be the needs for Title IX.
Title IX is a great law that help women get the same rights in education as men. Title IX has been active for over forty years and has been helping women achieve equality. Title IX is a law that stops sex discrimination and helps break down the barriers that women once had difficulty getting passed. This essay will be showing how Title IX is fair to men and women. This essay will show how Title IX is fair and show the claims on Title IX.
Moreover, IX is applied for all female and male students in GCU. Also, It protects us against sexual harassment both physically and online. Title IX offers me a safe environment to continue my higher education.
On June 23rd 1972, Title IX was enacted to get rid of barriers in federal education environments regarding gender. It begins, “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” Title IX corrected the original imbalances among the school place that barred many from participation, and available opportunities due to sex including athletics. Since then the representation of sexual orientation has grown and progressed to express a many and diverse range of gender, orientation, and preference (1). Yet Title IX falls short of full adaption of the currently changing
Some might argue for having transgender bathrooms in schools (to be), but there are some reasons why having transgender bathrooms should not be. Whether we begin with or end with religion it influences our take on this situation. Or maybe my argument about bullying and increased risk of being bullied in a bathroom might tug at you more. And for some of you it. might be all about the money, but here I will make 3 points supporting why transgender bathrooms should not be.
In “Boys Here, Girls There: Sure, If Equality’s the Goal”, Karen Stabiner writes an essay about same sex schools. In the first paragraph Stabiner opens the essay by saying, “Many parents may be wondering what the fuss was this past week, when the Bush administration endorsed single-sex public schools and classes.” (325) Stabiner is simply saying that many parents were probably surprised that the bush administration was for same sex schools. Stabiner then gives us her view on the topic by saying, “What I’ve learned is this: Single sex education matters, and it matters most to the students who historically have been denied access to it.” (326) Stabiner gives several examples and statistics in her essay to try and support her stand for same sex