followers can achieve maximum performance through the process of shared vision, clarify mission and organizational goals and objectives, encouragement, and positive motivation (Butler, 1999); transformational leadership embraces the idea of maximizing the followers’ full potential to optimize their performance (Bass & Avolio, 1990); transformational has a positive impact on both organizational and followers’ performance (Diaz-Saenz, 2011); autonomous, encouragement, and motivation enhances work performance in more complex and arduous tasks (McCleskey, 2014); it is more predictive of individual or organizational performance (Bass, 1985). There are suggestions in offering the advantageous reasons of the transformational approach such as the style …show more content…
Nevertheless, both styles are not limiting to certain deficiencies as well as advantageous. According to Northouse, the followings are the strengths or advantages of the transformational style: (a) widely researched – the style had been studied and analyzed for over three decades; there are a plethora of evidence this approach does work in certain circumstances, (b) intuitive appeal- it is an instinctive admiration without resorting to in-depth persuasion, (c) process between leaders and followers – continuum of interactions between the leader and the individual, (d) broader view of leadership – paradigm-shift with converging in the “out-of-the-box” thinking, and (e) emphasis on employees’ needs, values, and norms- individualized attention and accentuate on personal development and growth (Northouse,
The transformational leadership approach has a focal point in making sure the follower achieves the prime interest of the vision of the leader. Whereas servant leadership, the principle element is that of the interest of the follower and their well-being. Servant leadership is not based on getting results, however, the main focus is serving others. Whereas transformational leadership is results driven and strive for organizational results. Harvey (as cited in Stone, Russell, & Patterson) contends that the servant leader’s primary objective is the workers and their growth, then the customer base and finally the organizational bottom line (p.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP Transformational Leadership is defined as leadership style focused on effecting revolutionary change in organizations through a commitment to the organization’s vision. (Sullivan & Decker, 2001) Transformational leaders are usually given higher position and are known for their charismatic sense and ability to develop high visions and regards in the work they do. They often give their best performances due to the low morale or self esteem Example: Steve Job, Bill Gates and Ratan Tata. As the existentialist rightly said, we always have a choice, in doing what we already have done or doing that which we have never done.
Transformational leadership theory: Using levels of analysis. Personnel Psychology, 47(4), 787. Retrieved from
Another is, it is a catalyst to human resource development, i.e., skill sets, confidence, and experience. Also, the leadership style encourages diversity of leadership styles. Everyone in the team has his own leadership style, and understanding and utilization of the of the diverse style is very critical in any given forum. People who worked under my style of leadership tends to feel they can made difficult decision, and end of getting it right, they are so motivated, and feel the sense of urgency and fulfilment. “The approach can be most suitable when working as a team is essential, and when quality is more important than speed to market, or productivity.”
Their philosophy is “whatever-it takes” and delegates the frontline managers to lead “it is your business, your division, your market, your stores, your aisle and your customers (Home Depot 2009).” Finally , transformational leaders by definition seek to transform. Sometime when a organization does not transform it’s, employees become unhappy and leaders will
The organizational factors include: flexibility, responsibility, standards, rewards, clarity, and commitment. The research shows that the coercive and pacesetting styles have a negative correlations on organizational climate while the other four styles have a positive impact. Thus, except for unusual circumstances where coercive and pacesetting styles might be appropriate, leaders should normally use a combination of the authoritative, affiliative, democratic and coaching styles to achieve success. The best leaders will sense from their emotional intelligence when to use each of these styles. If you are an aspiring leader or a leader who wants to get to the next level of leadership excellence, Goleman’s article is a great primer on how to effectively use different leadership
Bass & Riggio (2005, pp. 4-8) explains that transformational leaders inspire their followers to exceed their own expectations and perceived capabilities and is comprised of the four components of idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualised consideration. DuBrin (2016, p.163) suggest that leaders in a time of crisis need to
Transformational Approach Transformational leadership style work towards high levels of communication from a management to meet goals. Leaders are meant to motivate employees and augment productivity and efficiency through communication and high visibility. This style of leadership really does need the involvement of management to meet goals. Leaders focus on the big picture within an organization and delegate smaller tasks to the team to accomplish goals. Transformational leadership proves to be efficient not only in business, but in all other sectors where it is used.
The leader’s ability to inspire, motivate, and foster commitment to a shared purpose is crucial (Bass, Waldman et al., 1987). Transformational leaders seek new ways of working, seek opportunities in the face of risk, prefer effective answers to efficient answers, and are less likely to support the status quo. Transformational leaders do not merely react to environmental circumstances; they attempt to shape and create them (Avolio and Bass, 1988). Transformational leaders may use transactional strategies when appropriate, but they also tend to utilize symbolism and imagery to solicit increased effort. The leader accomplishes this by raising the level of intellectual awareness about the importance of valued outcomes, by raising or expanding individual needs, and by inducing a belief in transcending self-interest for the sake of the team or organization (Bass,
They are courageous and also encourage the people around to one vision, inspire and leave permanent marks. According to Avolio (1999, p.43), transformational leaders handle issues in a moralistic way and they represent the “ideal” in their attitudes and behavior. From Bass’s and Avolio’s perspective (1994, p.2) transformational leaders make people aware of the vision of the company and be the representatives of the mission. With their help, employees discover their own potential, feel able to to their best and find out new perspectives. In the end organizations benefit and reach the aimed
1. Transformational leadership helps leaders to encourage their followers to perform above and beyond their duties and converting vision into reality by achieving high levels of performance. Transformational leader’s changes and transforms people and have ability to set high goals for the followers an (scott.williams). Charismatic leadership is characterized by the use of personal abilities and talents that have a deep effect on followers. The charismatic leaders rely heavily on referent power, and their unique and powerful gifts generate great influence with followers.
Therefore, I would encourage my 100 employees to transform their tasks according to their perspective and privilege them to manage their work in creative manner. As a leader, I would also emphasize on team decision-making practices and involving my 100 employees into decision-making process to enable their commitment and sense of empowerment. I will also put timely efforts to coaching, counseling and guiding my team for effective team-building and self-esteem development. These perspectives and action-plan will help to increase communication, involvement and engagement of the employees leads to empowerment and accountability. The transformational leadership basically focuses on empowering employees and leveraging them for creative methods of completing their tasks.
According to Blake and Mouton (1964), this is the best leadership style to be adopted. Team leaders pay high and equal attention towards the production needs and people relations. This method relies heavily on making employees feel themselves to be constructive parts of the company (Blake and
Transactional and Transformational Leadership Both concepts of the theory are built upon the reciprocity relationship between leader and follower. In contrast to the transactional leader who practices depending reinforcement of followers, the transformational leader inspires, intellectually stimulates, and individually considerate their team (Bass, 1999). At the core of transformational approach it is emphasize the both on leader ability to motivate and empower follower as well as in the moral dimension of leadership – it is about winning the mind and the heart (Bolden et al., 2011, p.31). The commitment building of this type of leadership is not only from the precise goal setting and evaluation but also through caring and inspiring the team.
In my view, the two leadership theories discussed are in consonance with my perspective that a leader is to serve the interest of his subordinate’s as they are the largest members of any organization. I also believe that subordinate being the least members of organizations should be appreciated and considered at all times as this is vital for sustaining the workforce and developing employee commitment to employers. Also both Servant and Transformational leadership styles, hinge their ideology on honesty, humility, vision, and authority as these key elements are active qualities continuously engage by me in my organization. I strongly believe that for any organization to keep evolving in the ever dynamic business world, employee motivation and acknowledgment is important as these are displayed by both leadership theories. I have discovered from recent times that the reason why employees resign from their work place is not that they hate their managers, but because they were not adequately motivated and acknowledged for accomplishments in that organization as their manages take credit for jobs done and enforces subordinates to serve their interest which should be the reverse.