Introduction
Leadership as defined by Northhouse (2007;3), is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal. In organizations, the success of the organization is determined by the ability of individuals to realize and have the same direction in following this common goal usually due to influence. Because of such, a number of leadership theories have been propounded over the years which have sought explore different dimensions of leadership in trying to come up with a panacea for problems which arise in organizations due to leadership. Amongst these theories and concepts are The traits theory of leadership, transformational leadership, transactional leadership, Mc Gregor’s theory X and Y. This paper
…show more content…
Transactional leaders is one in which leader-follower relationships are exchange based, that is both followers and leaders perceive each other as a means to their ends, that is they perceive each other as potential instruments to each other’s goals and needs in the accomplishment of asks and goals (Bass, 1990). Another theory which follows an almost similar perspective to that of the Transactional leadership style is the Transformational Leadership theory, this theory seeks to explain the extraordinary influence and effects leaders may have on their followers. Unlike transactional leadership which is mostly based on materialistic rewards from the leader for the accomplishment of tasks by the followers. For transformational leadership to exist, there should be first personal identification of the goals of the leader which motivates followers to exert high levels of commitment and …show more content…
According to Pastor and Mayo (2006), Charisma is a relationship bond between the leader and the followers. Charismatic leaders can instill a sense of dynamism, power and confidence to team members by articulating an organization’s long term goals and exhibiting confidence in their followers.
The third concept is intellectual stimulation, this refers to the behavior by leaders of questioning assumptions made by their followers. This is done so as to help them rephrase their problems and to enable them to approach old problems differently. Intellectual creativity helps create a sense of creativity among followers in overcoming obstacles which they face in their organization’s activities.
The last concept on transformational leadership is personal and individual attention. Individual attention refers to the attribute of the leader of showing concern for their followers through personal interaction with them. Once a leader shows concern and communicates with followers at personal level then the leader is perceived as approachable and friendly. This creates a bond between the leader and the followers which can play a crucial role in ensuring the fulfilment of the organization’s
The Transformational Leadership theory states that this process is by which a person interacts with others and can create a solid relationship that results in a high percentage of trust, that will later result in an increase of motivation, both intrinsic and extrinsic, in both leaders and follower. Rules and regulations are flexible, guided by group norms. These attributes provide a sense of belonging for the followers as they can easily identify with the leader and its purpose. There are certain skills a leader must acquire to lead and delegate properly. Respect is one thing that must be displayed, just because one is a leader it does not mean they have all the power and authority over any individual.
Transactional Leadership is based on the principles of the social exchange theory, in which an individual would expect to give and receive benefits or rewards when engaging in a social interaction (Sullivan, 2012). The interaction will cease if one or both person decides that the exchange of benefits and rewards are no longer worthwhile. Transactional Leadership theory also focus on the task that need to be carried out and makes sure they are done the right way as compared to Transformational Leadership theory which focus on staff empowerment (Marquis and Huston, 2015). A nurse manger in a department or ward is a good example of Transactional Leadership theory.
One commonality among the majority of history’s most effective leaders is that they possess charisma. Charisma is defined as a compelling attractiveness that gives an individual influence over others. A person with charisma is one with a dynamic personality. He elicits obedience through his powers of persuasion. A charismatic leader uses no force to extract compliance from others and has no legitimate power.
Leadership is a process of interactions between leader and other staff, where a leader is as a guidance that inspires other staff with vision (Marquis & Houston, 2012). A well known type of leadership theory are transformational leadership which were said has a positive
Moreover, charismatic leaders refer to values and moral justifications while giving hope to their followers and referring to faith. The charisma of a leader is directly related to his image in the minds of his followers. He had to be reliable and the followers should have faith in him. To sum up, charismatic leaders need to understand their followers and should create common goals where they link themselves to them with self consistency and self
Leadership Analysis Introduction One of the popular definitions of a leader is, "The only definition of a leader is someone who has followers." ( ) A more comprehensive definition that highlights striking features of a leader is, "A simple definition of leadership is that leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal.” ( ) A closer scrutiny of the characteristics of an influential leader would many ways assist one, in recognizing those attributes in an attempt to assimilate the best in others.
Leadership has been defined in a variety of ways, there are multiple authors and theorists who have tried to define and understand leadership, all leading to varying theories and conclusions, but one thing that is universally understood is the importance of effective leadership and how someone with good leadership skills can impact so many people around them. (Kakabadse and Kakabadse, 1999; Yukl, 2002; Northouse,2013) The main components that have been identified to play a role in leadership are relations between leader and subordinates, interaction form between leader and followers, the influence that the leader has, the way in which the leader behaves and finally a leader’s traits. (Yukl, 2002) These elements that make up a leader, are then used as building blocks to identify the way in which each specific leader deals with its followers.
Transactional Leadership Frequently referred to as a managerial approach to leadership, the transactional leadership style is centered on improving efficiencies within an organization or team (McShane & Von Glinow, 2015). Leaders practicing the transactional approach focus on the details of the step by step processes and workflows using a reward and punishment system to encourage workgroup production (Dartey-Baah, 2015). As errors and inconsistent results are part of the expected norm, transactional leaders succumb to the belief that employees require ongoing monitoring and supervision to ensure compliance with the expected work practices. When used with an experienced high performing staff, the constant supervision and punitive nature of the transactional leadership style can be counterproductive, causing a decrease in production and satisfaction among some groups. In contrast, when used with newly formed production units, the transactional style has been known to improve employee engagement and response (Breevaart et al., 2014).
“The study of history has been a study of leaders – what they did and why they did it” (Bass, 2008: 4). New contemporary styles of leadership have emerged that arguably are more successful in the long term (Dawson & Andriopoulos, 2014). This report critically evaluates different styles of leadership to determine if a transformational style will have a more decisive effect on employee motivation and organisational culture culminating in long term prosperity of the business. Fresh perspectives to leadership are required if organisations are to be successful in times of change while at the same time increasing employee morale (Conger, 1999). Studies done by Burns (1978) differentiates between transactional leaders and transformational leaders.
In this regard, leaders and managers can appear at any level of an organisation and are not exclusive of each other (Germano, 2010). Leadership theories identify leaders based upon traits as well as how their influence and power is used to achieve organizational goals and objectives (Germano, 2010). As such, trait based characteristics include leaders such as autocratic, democratic, bureaucratic and charismatic. On the other hand, leadership that is viewed from the perspective of the exchange of power and its utilisation to secure outcomes, are situational, transactional and transformational leaders (Germano, 2010). It is of paramount importance to consider the different types of theories of management and leadership and their potential impact on organizational strategy being that management and leadership plays a vital role in the success of businesses.
Intellectual stimulation is when a leader encourages creativity among his team. Individualized consideration is when support and encouragement are given to individuals rather than to an entire team. Inspirational motivation is when a leader is able to clearly communicate his vision to his followers.
This paper will examine the three leadership theories, identify how they apply to my practice, and explore how these theories interact with each other. The Trait Leadership Theory is based on the belief that a person is born with special traits contributing to natural leadership abilities. Studies of famous historical leaders have been used to identify various traits for this theory. Although the list of traits differs from study to study, there are five major traits that are consistent throughout most studies.
This paper is going to encompass different leadership theories and their relevance to my own personal personality and method of leadership. There will be information on the advantages and disadvantages of the leadership theories and information on each including examples. The purpose of this paper is to view various kinds of leadership theories and apply them to a real-life scenario. Leadership Theories There are quite a few different leadership theories available for people to take information from and use in business settings and even personal settings.
These leaders are often described as having charisma. Charismatic leaders communicate a need for change and a persuasive future vision, and influence followers by arousing intense emotions. Their followers trust and respect them and have great admiration for them, perceiving the leader to be exceptionally talented, often revering them. (Conger, Kanungo, & Menon, 2000; Diaz-Saenz, 2014; Grant,
Transactional Leadership Style The idea of transactional leadership theory was created in 1978 by J.M. Burns and based on Waber’s (1974) theory of leadership along with Kohlberg’s stage of moral growth (Sciotto, 2014). Transactional leadership style describes more on a “give and take” relationship as referring to the exchange relationship between leader and follower, in order to fit their own self-interests as a consequence of meeting particular objectives (Bass, 1985, 1990; Burns, 1978; Lai, 2011). This style of leadership will motivate their followers by focusing on changing and promises rewards when their followers able to carry out the specified tasks (Abdullah et al., 2014; Pedraja-Rejas, Delgado-Almonte, Rodriguez-Ponce, & Rodriguez-Ponce,