relation to parenting (Galbraith & Schvaneveldt, 2005). As women are more supportive behavior as compared to men (Gregory, 1990; Eagly & Karau, 1991), women transformational leaders could be more identified and trusted than male transformational leaders. The characteristics of Masculine leadership is being aggressive and analytical by showing the willingness to make a stand and assertive decisions Besides that, willingness to help others, caring, listening to and understanding others, group interaction and providing emotional support are the characteristics of feminine leadership.
Transformational leadership originated from charismatic leadership. The word charisma comes from the Greek word that means gift of grace. Charismatic authority is derived from faith in the leader’s exemplary character (Conger & Kanungo, 1987). Specifically, House (1977) maintains that the personal characteristics of the charismatic leader include a high degree of self-confidence, strong moral convictions, and a tendency to influence others
…show more content…
Moreover, transformational leaders show to their subordinates how task should be accomplished with determination. Typically, they accept almost everything including risk to achieve certain goal and for innovation. However, this is not always good all the time. The entire organization and its operation will suffer if they always do immoral and unethical behaviors. Furthermore, generating ideas without merit is one disadvantage of transformational leadership. For example, leaders of transformational provided the innovative thinking that helps their team to think complex ideas by conducting workshops. By arousing intellectual curiosity and their creativity, it will help your group to think new ways to solve problems. However, if acknowledging procedure is not established, this strategy will let you generate ideas having a few or no
Leadership has many definitions. Chin, Desormeaux, and Sawyer (2016) define leadership as a relationship between followers and a leader with the intent to promote change through a mutual vision. Therefore, leaders are active influences in the outcome of organizations, through their decision-making, strategies, and influence on followers (Dinh et al., 2014). Additionally, in the nursing context, it has been documented that a leader 's style plays a factor in patient outcomes (Fischer, 2016). Indeed, in an ever-changing, complex health care environment, nursing leadership has become a crucial factor in managing challenges and maintaining patient safety (Fischer, 2016).
Nohria and Khurana (2010) described a charismatic leader as “an individual as perceived by others...lies in what is thought to be his connection with some very central feature of man’s existence…and meaning is rooted in the fact that both [charismatic leadership and meaning] are concerned with the contribution to and reproduction of a
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP Transformational Leadership is defined as leadership style focused on effecting revolutionary change in organizations through a commitment to the organization’s vision. (Sullivan & Decker, 2001) Transformational leaders are usually given higher position and are known for their charismatic sense and ability to develop high visions and regards in the work they do. They often give their best performances due to the low morale or self esteem Example: Steve Job, Bill Gates and Ratan Tata. As the existentialist rightly said, we always have a choice, in doing what we already have done or doing that which we have never done.
According to Dawson (2008:9), there are three important features of charismatic authority. First, charismatic authority displays exceptional abilities (Dawson 2008:9)). Second, these exceptional abilities are thought to be divine or supernatural (Dawson 2008:9). Third, charismatic authority is highly personal and stems from a relationship with followers that is highly emotional (Dawson 2008:10).
However, while according to different authors, “It’s true that no amount of training or practice will turn you into Churchill or Martin Luther King Jr.”, the charismatic training “can make you more charismatic in the eyes of your followers, and that will invariably make you a more effective leader.” (Antonakis, Fenley, & Liechti, 2012) Conclusion If you add up all the basic properties of charisma, the main factors are the following: the ability of the leader to stand out from the crowd, emphasizing its uniqueness, unity of the followers, and finally, to the loyalty of the masses to the leader. Despite the exclusivity of the leader and his difference from the masses, they must have something in common that unites them: it may be a common enemy,
Their philosophy is “whatever-it takes” and delegates the frontline managers to lead “it is your business, your division, your market, your stores, your aisle and your customers (Home Depot 2009).” Finally , transformational leaders by definition seek to transform. Sometime when a organization does not transform it’s, employees become unhappy and leaders will
Bass & Riggio (2005, pp. 4-8) explains that transformational leaders inspire their followers to exceed their own expectations and perceived capabilities and is comprised of the four components of idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualised consideration. DuBrin (2016, p.163) suggest that leaders in a time of crisis need to
Transformational Approach Transformational leadership style work towards high levels of communication from a management to meet goals. Leaders are meant to motivate employees and augment productivity and efficiency through communication and high visibility. This style of leadership really does need the involvement of management to meet goals. Leaders focus on the big picture within an organization and delegate smaller tasks to the team to accomplish goals. Transformational leadership proves to be efficient not only in business, but in all other sectors where it is used.
Those individuals who were believed to have these inherent skills were people of very influential status, wartime heroes and those of great wealth. The people who emerge or are most picked to lead have distinctive drives and character profiles (Nicholson, 2013, p.16). Leadership Thought Development from 1900 – 1970 The thought of leadership evolved from the Great Man Theory to Trait Theory and Behavior Theory. The trait theory focuses on identifying distinctive personality traits and characteristics that are associated to successful leadership.
They are enthusiastic individuals are usually seen as active, expressive and energetic. They are often optimistic and open to change with a quick and alert mind set. Transformational leaders in today’s society are better for the organization because in maintaining a business for the long term, leaders need to focus on the overall growth of originality and
Our text states, “transformational leader is one who influences, inspires, mobilizes, and transforms followers to achieve
Authentic leaders have a positive impact on followers, groups, and organization (Yaacoub, 2016). These leaders can be motivating on one hand and change to another style depending on the condition. Both leadership styles look for ways to partner with people, groups or organization. Servant uses measures to a leaders effectiveness (Reed, Vidaver-Cohet & Colwell, 2011).
One of the biggest drawbacks of this kind of leadership is that if this style of leadership is used inappropriately then it can cause negative consequences, causing a lack of flexibility and work throughout the team. The transformational leadershipstyles depend on high levels of communication from management to meet goals. Leaders motivate employees and enhance productivity and efficiency through communication and high visibility. As “a leadership style focused on effecting revolutionary change in organizations through a commitment to the organization’s vision.”
This paper will examine the three leadership theories, identify how they apply to my practice, and explore how these theories interact with each other. The Trait Leadership Theory is based on the belief that a person is born with special traits contributing to natural leadership abilities. Studies of famous historical leaders have been used to identify various traits for this theory. Although the list of traits differs from study to study, there are five major traits that are consistent throughout most studies.
Charismatic can be learnt. Uncle Lim had the ability to bring the people together. The people willingly did everything for him and followed him where he shared it in his book, “If you build a successful business and organization, always believe that the most valuable asset of a company is its people. It is the people that make up the organization. It is the people that run the organization.