Transactional Leadership Theory Vs Transformational Theory
Transactional and Transformational Leadership
Both concepts of the theory are built upon the reciprocity relationship between leader and follower. In contrast to the transactional leader who practices depending reinforcement of followers, the transformational leader inspires, intellectually stimulates, and individually considerate their team (Bass, 1999). At the core of transformational approach it is emphasize the both on leader ability to motivate and empower follower as well as in the moral dimension of leadership – it is about winning the mind and the heart (Bolden et al., 2011, p.31). The commitment building of this type of leadership is not only from the precise goal setting and evaluation but also through caring and inspiring the team.
…show more content…
It is explained, also from the earlier research in this tradition (initially termed ‘vertical dyad linkage” theory), that the concept result in relative two forms of a relationship of high and low (Bolden, 2011, p.30). The LMX theory considers the extent of relationship might exist between leaders with each of the followers which contrast with situational leadership that treated followers as homogenous. The quality of mutual exchange relationship in this approach are varied from one subordinate to the other (Yukl, O’Donnell & Taber, 2009). First, the high-exchange is described as high level of trust, liking and respect as well as high expectation of each other exchange. Second, the low-exchange expectation only poses in formal requirement of the job and no extra benefits provided by the leader. However, exchange relationship gradually can be developed based on the reinforced behavior of the leader and subordinates.
Some study findings exposes that transformational leadership has positive association with the dimensions of LMX as well as innovativeness. In contrast, transactional leadership has negative association with innovativeness (Lee, 2008). The stronger positive relationship between LMX and creative work involvement was placed when employees experienced better job autonomy (Volmer, Spurk & Niessen, 2012). In the other hand, the creativity induce insufficient when employees experience many constraints in their jobs. This finding supported by a study about creativity process within
Summary Of The LMX Theory
750 Words | 3 PagesGraen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995, January 1). Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain
Pros And Cons Of Transformational Leadership
762 Words | 4 PagesTRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP Transformational Leadership is defined as leadership style focused on effecting revolutionary change in organizations through a commitment to the organization’s vision. (Sullivan & Decker, 2001) Transformational leaders are usually given higher position and are known for their charismatic sense and ability to develop high visions and regards in the work they do. They often give their best performances due to the low morale or self esteem Example: Steve Job, Bill Gates and Ratan Tata. As the existentialist rightly said, we always have a choice, in doing what we already have done or doing that which we have never done.
The Great Man Theory: The Transformational Leadership Theory
1186 Words | 5 PagesThe study of leadership is not something new, leadership theories have been the source of numerous studies. Many have tried to define what allows authentic leaders to stand apart from the followers, the wants following what the leader said. There as many theories on leadership as there are philosophers, researchers and professors that have studied and ultimately published their leadership theory. Theories are commonly categorized by which aspect is believed to define the leader the most. According with the article from Leadership-Central.com the most widespread one's are: Great Man Theory - “The Great Man theory assumes that the traits of leadership are intrinsic.
Comparing Mcgregor's Theory X And Theory Y
998 Words | 4 PagesTransactional leadership typically maintains status quo and does not elicit change. Transformational leadership, in contrast, attempts to change the status quo by developing a vision for the future that appeals to the values and sense of purpose of followers. Transformational leaders teach followers to become leaders, pursuing humanistic and moral end values related to making a difference in the world. Some elements of power and influence approaches, such as expert and referent power (French & Raven, 1959), social influence (Cialdini, 1995), and transformational leadership (Burns, 1978), begin to transcend perspectives on leadership based solely on leaders as roles in a hierarchy.
Transactional Leadership Theory In Nursing
2920 Words | 12 PagesTransactional Leadership is based on the principles of the social exchange theory, in which an individual would expect to give and receive benefits or rewards when engaging in a social interaction (Sullivan, 2012). The interaction will cease if one or both person decides that the exchange of benefits and rewards are no longer worthwhile. Transactional Leadership theory also focus on the task that need to be carried out and makes sure they are done the right way as compared to Transformational Leadership theory which focus on staff empowerment (Marquis and Huston, 2015). A nurse manger in a department or ward is a good example of Transactional Leadership theory.
Leader-Member Exchange Theory Analysis
3276 Words | 14 PagesIn the Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) theory of leadership, the quality of the exchange relationship between a leader and a particular member of a work unit, team or organization is the basic unit of analysis (dyad). In this article, we try to answer the question whether research on the various aspects of the exchange processes between leaders and their subordinates is consistent with the theoretical underpinnings of LMX theory. Our focus is on the similarities and differences between the theoretical assumptions of LMX theory and the way the core concepts are elaborated in empirical studies. Although LMX theory has resulted in a number of useful accomplishments, both theoretical and practical, it still faces a number of challenges. The main challenges
Lou Gerstner's Transformational Leadership Style
921 Words | 4 PagesTransformational Approach Transformational leadership style work towards high levels of communication from a management to meet goals. Leaders are meant to motivate employees and augment productivity and efficiency through communication and high visibility. This style of leadership really does need the involvement of management to meet goals. Leaders focus on the big picture within an organization and delegate smaller tasks to the team to accomplish goals. Transformational leadership proves to be efficient not only in business, but in all other sectors where it is used.
Leader Member Exchange Theory (LMX)
433 Words | 2 PagesI think the Leader Member Exchange Theory (LMX) is different from the other theories we have discussed in EL700 such as trait approach, skill approach and style approach. These are all focusing on characteristic and behaviors of the person with the positional power. LMX is not the leadership that is predicted by the leader or by the subordinate. The LMX is focusing on interactions between leaders and followers and that effective leadership comes from a vertical relationship between the leader and the subordinate. These interactions can be high quality or low quality.
Transformational Leadership Style Essay
1049 Words | 5 PagesSTREGNTHS AND WEAKNESS OF TRANSFORMATIONAL AND TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP Many leadership styles are considered by many authors. Some people think that they must stick to one particular style but it will lead to the less efficient results. Styles must be considered as per the requirement of the given condition. Here strengths and weakness of the transformational and translocation leadership is given as below: TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Contingency Theory Essay
992 Words | 4 PagesContingency theories put forth the idea that the success of a leader hinges on the specific situation at hand. A situation can be proven effective based on the leader or the leadership style attached. The factors that would determine this would include the task, the personality of the leader and the composition of the group that is meant to be led. Its basic assumption is that leadership-success or failure – is situational. There are a number of sub-theories that fall under the general contingency umbrella.
Transactional Leadership: A Case Study
488 Words | 2 PagesK., & Espevik, R. (2014). Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 87, 138-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joop.12041 Dartey-Baah, K. (2015). Resilient leadership: A transformational-transactional leadership mix.
Leadership Behavior And Motivation
951 Words | 4 PagesThis assignment intends to establish the role of transformational leadership style in motivating individuals in an organization to be committed to their
Transformational Leadership Style Analysis
723 Words | 3 PagesIn addition, this can proved by a study of leadership in Oxford House, finding that transformational and transactional styles of leadership were both positively correlated to each other, demonstrating that both are effective when used together (Komer, Jason, Harvey, & Olson, 2015). Traits, attributes, and behaviors of transactional leadership are based on the leader’s ability to motivate followers, while providing an appealing vision, stimulating challenges, and being an inspiring role model (Dóci, Stouten, & Hofmans, 2015). These also include behaviors such as being proactive, innovating, risk-taking, challenging others, and shaping meaning and creating purpose (Dóci et al., 2015). It was also found that transformational leaders transfer their enthusiasm and high power to their followers through active modelling, increasing the power as a component of work engagement in others (Hayati, Charkhabi, & Naami,
Reducing Resistance To Change Summary
1189 Words | 5 PagesPositive results were noticed when the leader-member exchange theory was used. The theory suggests that employees are more motivated by transactional leadership style as opposed to other styles. An unexpected interaction effect was discovered. The study should by reviewed by change agents. Jensen, M. M. (2003).
Transformational Leadership Research
876 Words | 4 PagesBernard Bass’s conceptualizations of leadership and the measures developed to quantify leadership were based on the premise that leadership could either be transactional or transformational. However, for the purposes of this study, only transformational leadership was investigated, and it was suggested that transformational leadership would likely be the most predictive characteristic of an optimal leader. (Avolio, Bass et al. 1999) noted that transformational leaders embodied characteristics of being charismatic and influential in their ability to make employees do more than what was expected of them at
More about Transactional Leadership Theory Vs Transformational Theory
Summary Of The LMX Theory
750 Words | 3 PagesPros And Cons Of Transformational Leadership
762 Words | 4 PagesThe Great Man Theory: The Transformational Leadership Theory
1186 Words | 5 PagesComparing Mcgregor's Theory X And Theory Y
998 Words | 4 PagesTransactional Leadership Theory In Nursing
2920 Words | 12 PagesLeader-Member Exchange Theory Analysis
3276 Words | 14 PagesLou Gerstner's Transformational Leadership Style
921 Words | 4 PagesLeader Member Exchange Theory (LMX)
433 Words | 2 PagesTransformational Leadership Style Essay
1049 Words | 5 PagesContingency Theory Essay
992 Words | 4 PagesTransactional Leadership: A Case Study
488 Words | 2 PagesLeadership Behavior And Motivation
951 Words | 4 PagesTransformational Leadership Style Analysis
723 Words | 3 PagesReducing Resistance To Change Summary
1189 Words | 5 PagesTransformational Leadership Research
876 Words | 4 Pages