Kids are not born being criminals, there are numerous reasons why kids get drawn into the world of delinquency. Three main reasons are peer pressure, the desire for protection, and the thirst for power and money. Many teenagers feel pressured by peer groups into doing things that they don’t want to do, yet they perform these acts in order to fit in or to stop harassment. In the article, “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences”, the author Gail Garinger states that adolescents are “...less mature, more vulnerable to peer pressure, cannot escape from dangerous environments, and their characters are still in formation” (¶6). A multitude of teens join criminal associations like street gangs in search of protection, most of them have a distanced
If the city provided funds for kids to join school groups and provided money for programs, more kids would be off the streets and doing something productive. It’s really hard to understand our standpoint if they don’t know the city we come from or our hardships that we endure due to low income and violence. In the article“Dehooding the hoodies; Youth work. This article talks about the system is failing to give teenagers the help they need to avoid committing crimes. It is plausible that if the city put more interest in preventing crime, there would be less depressive kids, or kids committing crimes.
It is just a matter of knowing the right people. Many people turn to gun violence, especially teenagers, because of either growing up in poverty or they are unstable emotionally and law enforcement tactics have failed in reducing it. The fastest and easiest way to get money is by joining a gang. Sociologists agree that the main reasons for joining gangs are friendships, income, and protection. Taking a quick glance at the areas where the violence is most severe shows that the three basic human needs of respect, employment and security and are not being fulfilled by the
Our Juvenile Justice System is broken. We live in a society that should be concerned with the way it manages teenagers who are deviant. Today, our juveniles are viewed as individuals to be feared rather than rehabilitated. Rarely are issues with juvenile crime and punishment treated under the rehabilitative philosophical basis parens patriae, instead youths are sentenced in juvenile facilities or even adult prisons for status offenses. They are placed in a community with expert criminals, and as a result, continue the lifelong journey of crime.
Richard Cloward and Lloyd Ohlin (1960) suggested that delinquency and gang formation originate from differential chance structures: the uneven distribution of legitimate and illegitimate way of getting goals. Lower-class adolescents ' limited accessibility legal way of achieving goals leaves them frustrated. Gangs can help to eliminate feelings of powerlessness by supplying youth’s use of illegitimate means that 's, with possibilities to understand and become instructed in crime by seasoned
Youth gangs in North American culture is simply old news being portrayed as something new. Despite the fact that it is realized that adolescent violations are overrepresented in the media today, the subject of youth gang movements is a significant bind to our general public. In the course of the most recent couple of years, there has been an ethical frenzy made by steady presentation to the media which depicts a measure of youth wrongdoings and savagery. In Canada there are expansive urban communities with high extents of youngsters, a considerable lot of which live in poverty, that now have the issue of managing youth gangs and youth wrongdoings. A significant part of the consideration has concentrated on the viciousness and the selling of
Evidence is also strong. If the police department has evidence that point directly to the juvenile or that the juvenile has something to do with it discretion is also thrown out the window. Complaints also are important as they come directly from the public and at times this does not really help the discretion process. Extralegal factors contribute to age, sex, ethnicity and race. Age also determine the outcome of the interaction.
This blatant lack of social control was used as a tool which encouraged youths to establish their own means of social order, they did this by either forming new gangs or joining existing gangs. The research which was done by Frederic Thrasher was substantially influenced most of the theories which emerged after it related to gangs. Albert Cohen, 1955 theorised that the emergence of gangs was directed to a subculture which had been created by the lower socioeconomic youths, and this was a result of their exclusion from mainstream middle-class culture. These youths noticed that they were unable to obtain the status of middle-class and created a gang culture that offered them an alternative source if
The theory that best support gang violence is the conflict delinquent subculture. Conflict delinquent subculture is a subculture in which youth oppose the mainstream through violence, underground economies and/or gang activity because of a lack of opportunities to succeed. Majority gangs are in low class neighborhoods where the kids there don’t have much offered to them. These adolescents are usually not completely loved and cared for within their households so they turn to the streets for “love” in gangs. These juveniles believe that once they gain a gang their going to be protected at all times by any counts, they mistake this for love.
According to the U.S Department of Justice (2001), the reasons that young adults join gangs can be either complex or for personal reasons. In their most recent study, it was found that just like male gang members, females join gangs because of economic problems and because of gang-family involvement and the pressure that comes from that family dynamic (pg. 2). According to Deschenes and Esbebsen (1999, pg. 63), traditionally, it is more common for males to be involved in gang and gang activity versus females.