From the discovery of the continent to the foundation of an independent country, all the way to its indisputable preeminent position in today’s society, the United State keeps growing as a front of world attention. Admired as a place of freedom and hope, millions of immigrant worldwide were shipped to the country every year. And because of this spetial formation of population, the American identity, the meaning of American citizenship, individual belonging, and the nation-state is repeatedly discussed and defined. Starting with the classical questions ”Who am I?”, ”Where do I belong?”, the issue of identity has been a central concern of Western philosophy for a hundred years. For centries, philosophers, sociologists and writter were engaged in defining American identity, trying …show more content…
Bourne’s essay has been influential, that he points out the failure of the “melting-pot” that aims at assimilating all immigrants into America culture, and erase their original identity to adopt a pure American one. He instead lays emphasis on the vigorous power of immigrants to shape and reshape America, suggesting an ideal higher than the “melting-pot” should be asserted, a better defined Americanism should be …show more content…
This is a remarkable transition of cultural focus which has always been on the search for the American identity. It is now needless to admire the nationalism of European countries as America is built up as the first international nation or cosmopolitan federation, which however can be dangerous to generate an early complacency and aversion toward the rest of the world, even a misinterpretation of it as economic imperialism. Bourne thus supplements the idea of international nation with “dual citizenship” which emphasis that the state of being an American citizen will never eclipse
In 1924 US congress passed the Johnson-Reed act. This act reduced the amount of immigrants coming to the US from any other country to a mere 2%. Many thought this act was unjust and consequently, “un-american”. One man, Robert H. Clancy, a Republican congressman from Detroit, stood up for those being oppressed by this act. Mr. Clancy states his points in the 1924 speech “An “Un-American Bill” through the use of diction, a myriad of anecdotes, and a motley of pathos.
“Melting pot” is a common term used to describe the culture of the United States, as the country blends the values and ideologies of an abundance of different groups of people and individuals. As a result, there are a variety of possible positions on what it truly means to be an American. Some may argue that American identity depends on ethnic origin, religious background, or other personal characteristics. Others might claim that being American depends on whether one believes in liberty, equality, individualism, and justice. Nevertheless, Dwight Okita and Sandra Cisneros demonstrate that some perceptions about American identity can induce more harm than others.
However, the fact is that most Americans have the impression that Hispanic immigrants are perceived as a threat for not assimilating into the American mainstream, more so into the Anglo-Protestant values. Why is that? Is it for fear that the Spanish Language may overrun the country? Similarly, Neil Foley, author of, Mexicans In The Making of America, asks the same questions, why fear? In his prologue chapter, Foley makes a point by proving the fact that in the past, Mexican immigrants were not a concern but were, “ let in to provide the labor force for the rapidly expanding economy”(2).
Appealing to the sympathetic emotions of his audience, he nevertheless, mentions the numerous and plentiful patriotic acts of immigrants, of which the native-Europeans would not do due to their laborious nature, “they do the hard work that native-born Americans dislike” (3). Speaking out at this time of prejudice in order to to clarify any misconceptions about immigrants, “ as patriotic as native born in offering the supreme sacrifice”. (4) In his speech Clancy, furthermore elaborates on how he relates to the immigrants affected by the Quota Act of 1921, with his first hand experience. Addressing any relating audience members, he pursues them to think of their own family lineage of which definitely has immigrant blood, if they are actual American’s at this time period, “my own family were all hyphenates” (5).
Between 1790 and 1920, the United States used assimilation to shift Native-American culture into Euro-American culture. Americanization policies stated that when Natives learned Americas customs and values, they could combine their culture with American culture and have a peaceful transition into society’s majority. However, after the Indian Wars, Native American children were sent to boarding schools where they were forced to adopt the English language and other cultural aspects of the new America and leave their own traditions behind. The question of whether assimilation should be encouraged is still debated today.
These ideals, according to the author, shape the foundation for the borders of belonging. The author defines personhood as, “legal recognition and protection of self-ownership, that is, of a right to one’s person, one’s body, and one’s labor” (Welke, 3). Essentially, the author works to convey the essence of individuality under the law, including the accessibility that certain groups have to legal recognition and self-protection. Therefore, the author, through introducing her analysis of personhood, reveals how personhood and citizenship are interdependent. Welke then introduces her understanding of citizenship as she
Despite the fact that the majority of the United States was already made up of immigrants from Europe and many other countries, Americans still viewed these new immigrants from southern and eastern Europe as “other.” These new Europeans were “foreign devils” who were unworthy of even being given the opportunity to assimilate and develop a life in America, so legislature like that of the Immigration Acts of 1918 and 1924 were put in place in attempt to gate-keep. Clancy opened his speech by saying, “Since the foundations of the American commonwealth were laid in colonial times over 300 years ago, vigorous complaint and more or less bitter persecution have been aimed at newcomers to our shores.” The statement still carries truth nearly a hundred years later and many Americans still wish to keep our gates closed and prevent other foreigners from seeking equal
Young Immigrants Struggles in “Water by the Spoonful”: How Contemporary United States Recognize Multiracial Americans The United States is often compared as a ‘Melting Pot’ due to its diverse race. It was aimed to create an ‘Americanized’ society where different cultures, languages, and religions blend and compose a unique national identity (Hakan 4). However, recent studies reveal that the increasing cultural diversity in the United States is threatening the long-existing belief of American national identity (Schildkraut 611). In other words, immigrants switch their identity while focusing on “concepts like ‘kinship’ or ‘native land’” instead of abandoning their cultures to become fully assimilated into American society (Čiubrinskas 62).
For generations, many Americans have seen their country as a haven for immigrants, a “melting pot,” of different cultures. These different cultures and traditions brought from countries across the world shaped the modern American identity, some would argue. While it is true many cultures from Europe, Africa, Latin America, etc. have contributed to molding the modern American society, immigration history is marred by resistance. Patterns in immigration throughout American history have created a culture de jour that is at the center for the most ardent opposition. From the Irish, to the Asians, and now Hispanics, it is easy to interchange the culture or race, while keeping the hysteria in any given decade from America’s past.
As a result of their emigration, America was now viewed as “multiethnic and multiracial” and “defined in terms of culture and creed” (Huntington 1). On the contrary, when people traveled across the border from Mexico, their culture was not so widely accepted. Mexican traditions and values were seen as a “serious challenge to America’s traditional identity” (Huntington 2). The “original settlers” of America were incredibly open to people travelling from Europe, but when people came from Latin America, they were
Immigration is deeply rooted in the American culture, yet it is still an issue that has the country divided. Marcelo and Carola Suarez-Orozco, in their essay, “How Immigrants Became ‘Other’” explore the topic of immigration. They argue that Americans view many immigrants as criminals entering America with the hopes of stealing jobs and taking over, but that this viewpoint is not true. They claim that immigrants give up a lot to even have a chance to come into America and will take whatever they can get when they come. The Suarez-Orozco’s support their argument using authority figures to gain credibility as well as exemplification through immigrant stories.
“The Immigrant contribution” and “The Quilt of a Country” are two essays that share a similar focus, however, they cover two drastically different sides of the topic. Both of them share the main idea that America is a country made up almost entirely of immigrants. Kennedy’s essay, “The immigrant Contribution”, focuses on how immigrants have affected our country, whereas Quindlen’s essay discusses how people of many different cultures coexist and work together. The essays both concentrate on immigration in America and how immigration has shaped and molded our culture. The two authors describe the many different aspects of immigration in immensely different ways.
Later, the cultural critic Stuart Hall has opined about the changing nature of identity. He says that there is no fixed identity that can be attributed to an individual for his life period; it evolves through several changes in each phase of life. So it can be understood that formation of identity involves several steps: construction, reconstruction and deconstruction. The politics behind this formation may depend on the nature of identity that an individual tries to hold. Indeed, the cultural critic Kobena Mercer reminds us: “One thing at least is clear - identity only becomes an issue when it is in crisis, when something
The two main texts to consider here are : Zygmunt Bauman’s “Identity in the globalizing world” and Stuart Hall’s “The question of cultural identity”. Both the authors deal with the identity discourse that has taken place with the advent of modernity or what can be thought of as how identity evolved in the modern times. Zygmunt Bauman’s article revolves around the thought that “we have moved from a
Mohsin Hamid has grounded his resistance narrative in the identity narrative and through the prism of identity offers a deep insight into the American society and its ideals. The novel exposes the ugly side of the American society with its fundamentalist institutions and dislodges the narratives of fundamentalism as a Muslim monopoly and inverts the myths and discourses on identity to produce a counter narrative. Key words: Identity, Fundamentalism, Culture, Stereotyping, Resistance. Identity as it has unfolded in diaspora writings has changed our perception about this seminal issue that has for times immemorial been a central focus of academic circles across the world.