There is a great concern to today’s inequity regarding Aboriginal people’s health, education, culture and language. Stereotypes and racism are preventing the Aboriginal people from seeking the benefits they deserve. As Treaty People in Canada, reconciliation must be a top priority to support the healing process of Canada’s history. The treaty relationship has a significant impact on all Saskatchewan and Canadian citizen’s personal beliefs, societal and political positions, and the process of reconciliation.
The Canadian government has created branches of the government to improve Aboriginal lives. Although these sectors of the government have supposedly good intentions “this government is more preoccupied on spending millions of dollars to
…show more content…
The Treaties were a way to take away the rights of the Aboriginal. The Aboriginal were granted small amounts of land, which is also known as reserves. Specifically, in 1608 when Canada began colonization, the Aboriginal people saw that “treaties were intended to be mutually beneficial, created out of equal shared goals” (A Solemn Undertaking: The Five Treaties of Saskatchewan). Having these two different perspectives contradict each other on the treaty relationship created inequality. Currently, Canadian land is covered by only 2% of reservation land, while the rest of the treaty land is shared with the remainder of Canada. As a matter of fact, Aboriginal people continue to be undermined by their lack of action to respond to the Aboriginal people’s complaints. Due to the amount of differences between Aboriginal people and non-Aboriginal people in many aspects, the Aboriginal are being treated differently. Thus, creates a treaty relationship that is unable to maintain its connection to the Aboriginal people and non-Aboriginal people in Canada. Bob Joesph explains how stereotypes “diminishes self-esteem and cultural pride, and for non-First Nations it dehumanizes and enhances negative perceptions of First Nations people and their culture”(The enduring Nature of First Nation Stereotypes Joseph). Regardless, there must be a way for Canada as a country to come together and redefine what the treaty …show more content…
It impacts all Saskatchewan and Canadian citizen’s personal beliefs, societal and political positions, and the process of reconciliation. All of these factors show how someone's perspective can determine someone's future. Gaining an understanding of the Aboriginal people's lives could help those people reach the reconciliation they deserve. The inequity Aboriginal people face through the government can be changed but only by those willing to raise their voice and become heard. It is Canada's turn to change the negative perspective of all the non-Aboriginal
The indigenous population in the geographical location of western Canada had their land officially taken over in 1869. (Daschuk 79) From then on, even with multiple treaties signed, the aboriginal people in this area and on the plains were ravaged with disease, fighting, famine and theft of land from the Canadian government. In this paper, I will first present a summary of James Daschuk’s two chapters outlining the issues stated above, and then an internal critique of the chapters, and, finally, an external critique of the chapters, comparing and contrasting it to Sidney Harring’s ““There Seemed to Be No Recognized Law”: Canadian Law and the Prairie First Nations’. The purpose of this paper is to provide insight and analysis on the aboriginal issues raised by Daschuk.
Justin Trudeau and the Liberal party is determined to creating more opportunity for the indigenous people, and allowing their voices to be heard more throughout Ottawa. Working towards this, the Liberal party will abolish all changes that deter the indigenous people from exercising their voting rights and to ensure that the indigenous people can freely practice their rights. In addition, the Liberal party will guarantee that the Kelowna Accord agreements will be embraced, along with the spirit of reconciliation which drove the agreements. Cognizant of the fact that there is a massive increase in population and inflammation in the First Nation community, the Liberal party will immediately increase the two percent cap on funding the First Nations, creating a community with a sufficient funding. Furthermore, owing to the underfunding of First Nation education system, many First Nation students are being held back in comparison with their provincial peers.
For decades, Canada has treated the Aboriginal peoples of Canada unfairly and that must change. The Environmental Party of Canada will strive to shine a light on these issues and bring awareness
The Aboriginals thought of the treaties as a mean to trade, not to own things. Another major issue and challenge with the numbered treaties were the fact that that there were many verbal promises made to the First Nations that didn't actually happen. These promises are called outside promises and were promises that weren’t actually written on the treaties. Namely, in treaties 1 and 2 First Nations said that the government would aid them in farming
Essay Outline The human race that inhabited the lands earlier than anyone else, Aboriginals in Canada had conquered many obstacles which got them to what they are today. In the past, Canadian Aboriginals have dealt with many gruesome issues that primarily involved the Canadians opposing them or treating them like ‘‘wards.’’ The Indian Act is a written law which controls the Indian’s lives and it is often amended several times to make Indian lives either peaceful or cruel but especially, cruel. Aboriginals found the Indian Act a massive problem in their lives due to it completely controlling them and how they lived on their reserve.
The author fails to acknowledge the fact that the accord failed because of the difficulty to pass constitutional amendments. Specifically, throughout history constitutional amendments are very difficult to legitimize. For this reason, having a vague Charter that is interpreted by courts is the most feasible option. In summary, the Charter has not solved the many problems suffered by the aboriginal community to the extent that many have hoped for. However, it has progressed a long way, and more importantly, it has initiated a movement full of potential.
Consistently we see the media reporting on the vicious cycles that the Aboriginal people have been forced into, but make it seem as though they are there by choice. The media creates a biased picture for the majority of Canadians; a picture that is painted in harsh black and white strokes with no input from the grey area. In democracy, we need to have everyone represented equally, not some at the top of the pyramid and others consistently as the lowly bottom tier. The movie Our
These claims are backed by evidence that Indigenous peoples lived and inhabited these lands for thousands of years before European contact. treaty rights, land claims, and governance are key to maintaining good relations between the government and the indigenous peoples of Canada. Treaty right agreements were made to promote harmony between colonists and indigenous peoples and to ensure the sharing of
I believe that the Canadian government is guilty of genocide against the aboriginal people of Canada because of the residential schools, the creation of the Indian act and the enfranchisement of first nations people. The first reason I think the Canadian government is guilty of genocide is the residential schools. The schools were government sponsored religious schools established to assimilate aboriginal children into the dominant Canadian culture. Their policy was to remove children from the influence of their families, cultures and traditions.
Canada is often regarded as multicultural country with a high human development, great education, high life expectancy and extraordinary healthcare, proving it is an over all exceptional place to live. Although this might be the case, a fraction of Canadians who are “Indians” believe their native culture is being compromised and quality of life does not reflect that of the over all population. In the Globe and Mail article , To be Indian in Canada Today… by Richard Wagamese’s the author argues the pros and cons to granting Métis and non-status Indians status under the Constitution Act. As well as, when it comes to nationalism how are Indians regarded and what role do the first nations play in the construction of Canadian culture (Wagamese,
According to Anzovino and Boutilier (2014), “the legislative definition of Aboriginal peoples includes all persons of “Indian” blood who were known to belong to a specific band, living on specific land, with their descendants [and] all persons intermarried with any such “Indians” who resided among them” as well as all children and persons adopted in infancy (p. 90). These persons are immensely proud of their good character, race, beliefs, values and morals. However, they are receiving abuse and a lack of promised assistance from the government. How can Canada act so neglectful and inattentive to those that live north of the suburban area? Are we not all equal and deserve the same rights, especially basic living conditions in order to survive?
Institutional and historical analysis often portray the motives of governments, especially in the cases of Quebec separatism and Aboriginal mistreatment. History describes attempts at compromise to rectify the problems by altering political institutions to provide more autonomy to the provinces, witness in various accords and the methods described previously. However, in regards to Aboriginals a historical relationship of exploitation and eradication sheds on the systemic issues that Aboriginals cope with and the institutions that caused them. As scholars of Canadian politics, it is important to consider historical and institutional analyses when looking at any issue, as it reveals the underlying motives of actors in regards to the cleavages that comprise a state.
Canada is known for its amazing healthcare and it is considered one of the best in the world. In Canada, healthcare is ‘universal’ to its citizens under the Heath Care Act. However, not everyone has equal access to healthcare, Aboriginals being some of them. Aboriginals have trouble getting the access they need because of socio-economic status, geography, lack of infrastructure and staff, language or cultural barriers an more. Aboriginals on reserve face many barriers when it comes to access to healthcare, they include cost, language, distance, climate, education and more.
Critical Summary #3: First Nations Perspectives In Chapter eight of Byron Williston’s Environmental Ethics for Canadians First Nation’s perspectives are explored. The case study titled “Language, Land and the Residential Schools” begins by speaking of a public apology from former Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. He apologizes for the treatment of “Indians” in “Indian Residential Schools”. He highlights the initial agenda of these schools as he says that the “school system [was] to remove and isolate [Aboriginal] children from the influence of their homes, families, traditions and cultures, and to assimilate them[…]” (Williston 244).
As per Elder Crowshoe, “reconciliation for Aboriginal people means not only reconciling with people but also with the natural world. Additionally, reconciliation remains incomplete if humans continue to destroy the natural world”. According to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, “reconciliation is about creating and upholding a respectful connection between Native Canadians and non-Native Canadians. To make that happen, it is necessary to be aware of what was done to the aboriginal community, apologize for that and alter the ways to behave with them in the present and future”.