In the book of Numbers, Moses and the Isrealites travel through the desert. Recently following their escape from Egypt. They find themselves faced with sin and temptation in the form of the Midianite people. “Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves”. Numbers 31:17-18
Historical Background Numbers was written by Moses sometime between 1200 and 100 bce. It records the time the Isrealites spent in the wilderness following Exodus. The striking command to kill the young men and women who have had intercourse happens in the last section of the book, In the Plains of Moab, occurs just before the Isrealites enter
…show more content…
An interesting concept to look at in comparison is the “Trolley Dilemma” which prompts whether the sacrifice of one life is worth it to save the many. The concept starts with a trolley on a track that splits into two different paths. Standing on the path to the right are 5 people who will be killed if the Trolley stays on its original path. To the left is a person standing alone. The driver of the Trolley must decide to either stay on the same path or alter course and decide whether to kill the five people or just one. The “deontological” argument states that both choices are wrong and would prefer that the individual lives. On the other hand the “utilitarianism” argument of the dilemma states that sacrificing one life to save five is the moral choice. However, the driver of the trolley would have to actively change course knowing that the one person would die. Most obviously prevalent in the Bible with the death of Jesus for the forgiveness of all humanity. This path most similarly aligns with Moses following God’s command to kill the Midian women. Making sacrifices to solidify the arrival of the Isrealites in …show more content…
The quote made me angry to read. I took it as targeting women who are not virgins. I think that the passage more so points towards humanity’s lack of perspective in comparison to God. Even though the Isrealites were very much a lost people in the wilderness, they still kept their trust in God to lead them to the promised land. As He has infinite knowledge and ultimately knows what is going to push people towards heaven. There is a difference between understanding something and actually believing it. While I already believed in God before this paper, I feel as though I have a deeper understanding of Him because of what I have learned through His first
This statement is really upsetting knowing that the Branch of Davidians would even kill the innocent children. The violence that occurred went to an
If he harvests the healthy person’s organs and incidentally kills him, five lives can be saved. According to Foot, this is not the same setup as the Trolley Driver. In this example, the surgeon does not have to choose between killing one and killing five, but rather between letting five die and killing one to save five. With Foot’s logic, the duty not to harm the healthy person trumps the duty to aid the five patients, because negative duties are obligatory while positive duties are permissible and commendable. This example prefaces the Train Dilemma
“After 11 months in the region of Mount Sinai, the Israelites set out for the "promised land" (Numbers 10:11-12).” Just as the Joad’s have prepared very hard for their journey all the way to California the Israelites have done the same. “She said, ‘Tom, I hope things is all right in California.’ He turned and looked at her. ‘What makes you think they ain’t?’
Under slave-labor conditions, severely malnourished and decimated by the frequent selections, the Jews take solace in caring for each other, in religion, and in Zionism, a movement favoring the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, considered the holy land. The prisoners are forced to watch the hanging of fellow prisoners in the camp courtyard. They even hang small child. Because of the horrific conditions in the camps, many of the prisoners begin to slide into cruelty, concerned only with personal survival. Sons begin to abandon and abuse their fathers.
Moses eventually freed these people and guided them along a path to the promise land. The Exodus event with Moses is very
The Lord leads Israel in conquering the land and judging its wicked inhabitants, and then he distributes the land among the twelve tribes. The book ends with Joshua’s pleas for Israel to remain faithful as God’s people. Judges opens with Israel’s disobedience. They refuse to wage war with unbelief and to purge idolatry from the land. The books of Samuel, named after him, tell of a time of great change within the Israelite nation.
In the Bible, the hatred between Samaritan and Jews had a long history. Around 400 B.C., one Passover, the Samaritans polluted the temple by scattering parts of dead bodies all over the temple grounds in Jerusalem. Some time later, Jews attacked and destroyed the Samaritan temple on Mt. Gerizim. The hatred, the antagonism was bitter and sometimes deadly. In Jesus’ time, Samaritan woman was considered being in a state of religious uncleanness.
Since humans had established their dominance over all species on Earth, humans had to separate their own race. The male gender have chosen to be more dominant than the female gender and all other eleven-known genders, and the class system of patriarchy is ran by the power of men. Ishmael goes all the way back to the beginning of the Agricultural Revolution and explains how the Semite women were made to provide society with babies, while the men were made to maintain the farm and do other forms of muscular work, such as building and hunting. The men needed to have help on their farms to progress more in society and the more men the better. According to the Semites story, Ishmael concludes that “Having too many men didn’t threaten the stability of their population, but having too many women definitely did” (109).
Therefore, Thomson finds it puzzling that it is permissible to kill a person by turning the trolley, but not permissible to kill a person by removing his organs since both of these scenarios have the same “net saving of four lives”(Thomson, pg.2). In this essay, I will articulate how Thomson attempts to solve this puzzle by arguing that her view of redirecting existing harm and avoiding infringement of
Some men try to use the Bible to justify their horrible actions against others. Miss Maudie is explaining this to Scout, though Scout only kind of
Again, I feel as though this reflects on the Sumerian view that humans are limited and the world is, at any time, capable of falling back into chaos. The Sumerian gods were careless and reckless regarding the humans, whereas the Israeli God specifically chose a family that he had deemed worthy to create a new
The Myth of the Twelve Tribes of Israel In the article "The Myth of the Twelve Tribes of Israel," Andrew Tobolowsky argues that the idea of the twelve tribes of Israel as a distinct and cohesive unit is a myth. Tobolowsky contends that the biblical notion of the twelve tribes is a construct of post-exilic Israelite writers who were attempting to create a unified national identity. While Tobolowsky's argument is certainly compelling, it is not without its critics. In this paper, we will examine Tobolowsky's claims and evaluate their merits.
The Book of Numbers – in Hebrew, Bəmidbar, meaning “in the wilderness [of Sinai]” – describes the the Israelites’ long journey in the desert to take possession of God’s promised land. The Jewish Study Bible divides Numbers into three major units based on “geographical criteria” and “ideological motifs”. The first unit spans from Numbers 1.1 to 10.10 and details the Israelites’ encampment at Mount Sinai and their preparation for the long journey. The second unit picks up this narrative and describes the generation‐long march in the desert from Sinai to Moab. The final unit, starting with Numbers 22.2, narrates the encampment on the plains of Moab before entering the promised land of Canaan.
Utilitarianisms would answer the question in the affirmative and change the track so only one person has to suffer. However, we have to question if the Utilitarianism is applicable to such ethical questions (Smart & Williams, 1973). This essay will outline several strength and weaknesses of the Utilitarianism devised by Jeremy Bentham. Firstly, the Utilitarianism will be outlined, secondly some strength and weaknesses are explained by employing examples, and thirdly several solution approaches for dilemmas Bentham’s Utilitarianism is facing will be sketched.
Life or Death Who chooses death over life? Sometimes we have to make this decision over a loved one when there is no hope for their recovery. It would be incredibly hard to make this life or death decision on another human being and twice as hard when it is someone we love. The author discusses the argument of this controversial topic of sustaining life at any cost or dying peacefully as an ethical issue. An ethicist, a person who specializes in or writes on ethics, can provide valuable discernment with respect to right and wrong motives or actions.