Obsessions with True Crime: Do they have an negative impact on society? Could obsessions with the true crime genre have a negative impact on our society? True crime is one of the most rapidly growing genres in today’s society that includes an array of works ranging from novels to television series. Authors and directors thoroughly examine real-life crimes and the actions of real criminals through their own perspective in order to engage an audience. The intense stories of crime and criminals immediately draw in an audience of all ages, genders, and races. These novels, podcasts, documentaries, and television series are presented in a way that makes the audience feel as if they are not only engaging in something entertaining but also something …show more content…
James Renner’s book, True Crime Addict: How I Lost Myself in the Mysterious Disappearance of Maura Murray, proves that obsession with true crime has a large effect on a person’s life. Renner actually does lose himself in the case of Maura Murray. He admits that he was slowly becoming a bad father, and he even begins drinking alcohol excessively. Renner is obsessed with this case and also has a lot going on in his home-life. While dealing with everything in his life, he writes, “Around this time I started smoking weed again”(Renner 144). Because he was so stressed out with the case and his personal experiences, he turned to marijuana and alcohol for relief from his stress. A.J. Marsden, an assistant professor of human services and psychology at Beacon College says, “Consuming this genre in excess can potentially increase your feelings of paranoia and inhibit you from taking risks, even minor ones”(Marsden). For example, some people may pass up opportunities to spend time with friends or family because they do not want to risk being in a threatening situation, like walking in a dark parking lot alone at night. This is extremely unhealthy because shutting people out can cause mental health issues. Marsden even admits that her true crime obsession caused a shift in her mood “from generally upbeat to melancholy”(Marsden). She also admits that she had a difficult time …show more content…
Research shows that most people in the US get most of their impressions and knowledge about the criminal justice system through viewing television drama. “A 2009 study out of Perdue University found that watching cop shows…had an impact on what viewers thought about the criminal justice system”(Gold). Viewers tend to estimate way more deaths because of murder in the real world than non viewers estimate. The more people watch crime shows the more they believe that there is a higher crime rate in their society. A current study found that “those who watched crime dramas and viewed nonfictional crime shows had greater fear of crime and supported the death penalty more”(FYI Living). The study also found that those who had more fear of crime had less faith in the justice system. Viewers of crime dramas also misjudge the amount of law enforcement officers and attorneys in the total work force. When the shows “CSI” and “Law and Order” first became popular, the “CSI effect” was observed. Bernard Knight, formerly one of Britain’s chief pathologists, said that “because of television crime dramas, jurors today expect more categorical proof than forensic science is capable of delivering”(Knight). There have been several different studies to prove that the “CSI effect” is indeed real. The most obvious symptom of this effect is that jurors believe that they have enough knowledge of science they have
Dude Freeman, a 17 year old kid in the juvenile centre, talks about the drug dealing experience he encountered as being a ‘family-owned’ thing and described the ways in which people in the hood interacted. He said him and his brothers had a motto- “OFF”, meaning ‘only fuck with family. ’(Bergmann 2008, 108). This motto shaped Dude’s interactions, really emphasising the importance of sticking with family as at the end of the day, they’re the only ones you can trust to have you back and look out for you. This was something Dude later learnt after getting snitched in to the police by a group of so-called friends for something he wasn’t fully responsible for (Bergmann 2008, 9).
Marci presents a number of issues that are a direct result of drug and alcohol abuse. However, the two key issues that seem to have a detrimental affect on Marci’s life are her alcohol use and her marijuana use. In order of importance, Marci’s alcohol use would be the most prominent priority. Second to Marci’s alcohol use, would be her marijuana use. Marci also smokes cigarettes, which may play a key role in her vulnerability to alcohol and marijuana.
Additionally, familial dynamics also played a role in shaping public perception of this case. The documentary illustrates how deeply rooted social hierarchies and power structures within small towns can impact how people view crimes committed by those in positions of privilege. The victims' families felt that they were not receiving justice because of these power structures, which favored those with connections and money. However, it is important to note that not all families react similarly when faced with tragedy or crime. Some may become more united while others may crumble under pressure.
In essence, the initial reaction a viewer may have towards White’s methamphetamine operation may be one of a forgiving nature that may be hesitant to label White a felon when they consider his pure motivations; furthermore, the viewer would be caught in a critical existential question of what extent they would go to in order to provide for the wellbeing of their own family if they were in a similar situation, and they may indeed be caught in the gravity of the situation when considering the good of their own family, as is White, or the evil done to society through the processing of illegal substances. In the midst of this existential crisis, many viewers of the BB show support of Walter White in his criminal activity because at the heart of his transformation is the symbolic representation of the average underappreciated man who’s merely trying to provide for family at any means necessary, which many people can relate to on some deeper existential
Dexter accurately depicts these kinds of cases and shows a way that the justice system can handle evidence. This will lead to the arrest of criminals. The series also
The current myth that I chose to analyze for this module is the television show “Sneaky Pete.” Sneaky Pete is a show in which a man by the name of Marius Josipovic is in jail with another man named Pete Murphy. We find out that Marius is in jail because of his past record for being a con man and stealing from a number of people and institutions. While in jail these men become good friends and Marius gets to learn about Pete’s life leading up to him being imprisoned. Marius finds out that Pete is in jail for attempting to rob a gun range, and that his family does not know about this.
Sonny is a 24-year-old single Latino male living with his adoptive parents. Recently he has been referred by his outpatient psychotherapist for hospital admission. Within the past 2 years, Sonny has been struggling with symptoms such as concentration difficulties, anxiety, and obsessional thinking. Sonny began experiencing paranoid and delusional thoughts a year prior to his admission after Sonny began to smoke marijuana. More recently, Sonny developed concerns that the police and FBI were “out to get him.”
This essay will tackle the topic of substance use disorder as a psychology topic. The film that will be reviewed for the topic is 28 Days. This is a film written by Susannah Grant and written by Betty Thomas. The film stars Sandra Bullock as a columnist for a New York newspaper (Thomas). In the film, Bullock acts as Gwen Cummings, an alcoholic forced to attend rehab for 28 days.
This may cause the jury to be indecisive between what the actual case and what the media portrays it to be. The amount of media released for cases creates a negative impact within the courts and makes it difficult for a fair trial. When juries are uncertain about a case or a suspect, they result to social media platforms and news coverage that will provide them with more information and depth into the case. ‘’But if the case unfolds in the media, by the time a case gets to court, the supposedly impartial jury (or even the judge) may have already heard information and allegations (not admissible by court standards) that have caused them to seriously prejudice the parties’’. (Nedim, 2014).
Basic scientists are individuals who prefer to study occurrences in order to gather a better understanding to satisfy their curiosity. This process doesn’t resolve in answering the question but rather gaining the knowledge (Greene & Heilbrun, 2014). The basic scientists’ role in law enforcement is to conduct “research on the relationship between social attitudes and behavior can clarify why people obey or disobey the law” (Greene & Heilbrun, 2014). This predation is transferred to the courtroom through testimony and
James’ single mother tries to place him in a public school, but the school’s administrators find him too much of a risk because of his long rap sheet. Very soon, James is using drugs daily, staying out late and
These factors could make anyone thinking about or currently producing meth re-check their priorities. The possibility of long prison sentencing and the violence that comes along with the trade may make people think twice before entering the world of methamphetamine. Although the pilot does not give a direct example of an individual consuming meth, later episodes portray multiple individuals accurately absorbing the drug through oral, intranasal, intravenous and smoking methods. These episodes could stick in the viewers subconscious and may be later recovered if the individual encounters an opportunity to try methamphetamine. These images could also induce a
He used to set fires to many different things and other things as well while he was drinking. After he sobered up he would feel really bad for the things he did. It wasn’t for many years later while a judge was reviewing his criminal records, that she saw a pattern forming and requested that he went for some testing. It was because of that testing that the judge was able to inform him that his impulsiveness was caused because of him having FASD, and that lead him along the path that he was taking. It was because of that judge that he was able to make the necessary changes to his life.
Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher Name Academic Institution Author Note Class Professor Date TABLE OFCONTENTS1 CASE/OFFENDER 3 OFFENSE/CRIME 4 MOTIVATIONS/BACKGROUND 4 THEORY 5 VICTIMS 6 COSTS 7 ADJUDICATION/DISPOSITION (PROSECUTION/SENTENCING) 7 CONCLUSION 8 REFERENCES 10 Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher
The research contains inaccurate information, making the results false. They both believed that the only way to effectively determine the legitimacy of the correlation between the number of police officers and crime rates was to perform a time-series analysis (Kovandzic, Sloan, 2002). They questioned and analyzed the methods used by Marvell and Moody (1996) for examining police and crime relationship. In their study, increased police levels significantly lowered crime on the assumption that hiring more police officers reduce crime. Based on deterrence theory, hiring more officers is justifiable and deters prospective offenders from engaging in illegal activity.