Guilty of Love After a few years of marriage, a woman's ardor seems to shift from her spouse to her children, resulting in an all consuming maternal desire that overshadows any romance in a once loving marriage. This is the stigma that Ayelet Waldman’s argument is founded against in “Truly, Madly, Guiltily.” Waldman goes as far as to say, ‘There is absolute unanimity on this topic, and instant reassurance. Except, that is, from me.” Truly, Madly, Guiltily has a wide display of rhetorical tools used by Waldman, from the relaxed format laced with satire, to the loads of empirical evidence from her experiences, to the authority of her own motherhood. She is not only shifting the stigma that moms must have kids as the centerpiece of their lives, …show more content…
She did not start out with critiquing their choices, in fact, she starts out much more timid, asking, “Why am I the only one incapable of placing her children at the center of her passionate universe?” Ayelet never says these mothers are in the wrong for loving their children, in fact she makes it clear that she loves her own. The tone of this article is much lighter at the beginning, she talks about the parental past time known as “God forbid” as a way of connecting with other mothers in a humorous and relatable way. I would argue it is this paragraph where the tone changes, and she takes a bold stand, “Because if I were to lose one of my children, God forbid, even if I lost all my children, God forbid, I would still have him, my husband.” Waldman tops the paragraph with this solid statement of who is the centre of her life. For a minute she uses the lack of satire in her writing to set a very serious tone, to show her audience that she really means what she says, before she picks it up again talking about her husband and his love for klingon politics. The author knows when to be serious and oppositional, as well as when to appease her readers who do not see eye to eye with her. She also knows when to get into the shoes of her audience and when to teach from her own
Activity theory, as interpreted by Ph.D. candidates, Wardle and Kain, is a process that attempts to see all aspects of activity such as social interactions and use of writing and language to achieve goals. This theory is award winning. Activity theory states that for a system to be effective, the rules, community, subject, division of labor, and motives must be reasonable. These components are shown through the chosen tool of communication most often. When one area of the system is corrupted, the tool will no longer function correctly in order to communicate or achieve its goals.
In expositions, writers usually tend to focus on certain techniques to not only enhance their writing, but also make their audience believe in whatever they are writing. These age old techniques have been used for so long for one common goal, to create clear messages from their writing that the audience are able to connect with. When their is a feeling of understanding of what the writer is attempting to portray, it makes it far easier to obtain a deeper knowledge. In Hope Edelman’s essay, The Myth of Co-Parenting: How it Was Supposed to Be. How it was, she doesn’t fall short on exemplifying these certain techniques through the act of making her audience feel sympathetic.
Recently, the alarming rates of obesity in our contemporary society has been due to the lack of active behaviours starting from a young age in which the younger generation spends a large amount of their childhood watching television. Both concerned and disappointed, Zan Smith’s pragmatic article titled “Beach Lessons”, published on the Child Monthly magazine, exposes the concerns of the increasing amount of time children spends viewing television and playing video games and should, therefore, be minimized. Accompanying her informative piece are two photographs that are contrasted and accentuates the importance of a child’s youth. Furthermore, Smith targets parents of young children in an attempt to encourage parents to take their kids outside
The main points that she is trying to make is that, to produce a great writing
This allows the audience to know that she can relate to the situation. Most everyone texts and it can be easy to allow such language to bleed over into any type of formal writing. She, however, believes that people have enough common sense and control and that most people don't allow themselves to use such language in their final drafts of their formal writings. Despite establishing her credibility and strong use of logos, she does, however, lack in pathos. She fails at truly connecting with the reader on a more personal and emotional level.
Gonzalez Mrs. Henson ENG 102-820 14 April 2016 A Rhetorical Analysis of Happy Roko Belic the filmmaker of the documentary “Happy” that incorporates multiple people from people worldwide in order to promote the claim to the audience which is that anybody can achieve happiness. By including vaious stories of people with tragic or painfulaituatons and showing how they were able to overcome their struggles , it shows the audience that there are no barriers that prevent the audience from their pursuit to happiness. The documentary aims to target the American audience who is struggint o obtain happiness who believe tha they are unable to achieve happiness because of prior experiences. In presenting people origionating from radically different locations
In Jeffrey Kluger, Alex Aciman, and Katy Steinmetz’s article, “The Happiness of Pursuit,” several rhetorical strategies make their argument persuasive for their intended audience. The first technique they employ is clear structure in organizing their piece. In the beginning Kluger, Aciman, and Steinmetz use a hook detailing a historical funnel that paints a picture of how many things in America have risen out of difficulty. Specifically they state, “We created outrageous things just because we could--the Hoover Dam, the Golden Gate Bridge, the Empire State Building, which started to rise the year after the stock market crashed, because what better way to respond to a global economic crisis than to build the world 's tallest skyscraper?” (Kluger,
Love is a complex phenomenon between two people, it is an unbreakable bond that lasts a lifetime. Frankie’s parents have a bond that is described as, “the perfection of human love” by Sister Marie-Cécile when Mrs. Burnaby was standing over the late Mr. Burnaby in the “immortal attitude of love” (73). This bond is as strong as two people could have, always standing behind one another and making sure they have the best life possible. However, Hetty Dorval does not love anyone, even her own mother who endures a large amount of suffering as her maid in order to keep her satisfied. Even when Mrs. Broom admits to Hetty that she is her biological mother, Hetty has no sudden realization of love; Hetty continues what she has done to countless people before and simply walks out of her mother’s life with no emotion.
She wrote the article keeping parents in mind, by telling stories and shedding light on the true points that every parent experiences. Parents were her target audience who she wrote to show them all the benefits of this new type of parenting while letting them know that she understands the overprotective urge. She presents her own opinions without pushing anyone to believe them, but she makes sure they are stated clearly. The article was well thought out and composed to bring awareness that it’s acceptable for young kids to be allowed freedom to
Maria W. Stewart Analysis In this excerpt of a lecture given by Maria W. Stewart in the year 1832, she has a strong point: Although the African Americans in the northern colonies were free, they were not treated equal as the white people were. Stewart uses a variety of rhetorical strategies to bring her point in the situation, such as argument, compare and contrast, and appeal to ethos. Along with the persistent and serious tone, it is clear that she sees the unfair treatment of African Americans a major problem.
She continues to connect with the reader on a personal level showing them that there is a moral choice hoping the reader will walk away with that in their head. She states “A country song I once heard said it all for me. “You’ve got to stand for something or you’ll fall for anything”” (Ericsson 129). By highlighting this country song lyric, she justifies and helps persuade the reader that there is a dark side to lying. Ericsson quotes George Bernard Shaw by saying “The liar’s punishment (…) is that he cannot believe anyone else” (Ericsson 128).
Past leaders such as Andrew Jackson, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Marc Antony are evidence that society does not reward morality and good character in leadership. Society is drawn to leaders that have good rhetoric, propaganda, and charismatic personalities, and society supports them despite their immorality. Society is concerned about stability more than the morality of their leaders and will support immoral leaders in times of crisis to provide stability. In history there have been multiple leaders that have used rhetoric, propaganda and charismatic personalities to gain power, despite their morals.
The ability to divide our attention during cognitively demanding tasks and the allure of technology creates a delicate balancing act that can at times have grave consequences. On September 22, 2006 in Utah, Reggie Shaw placed the fates of James Furfaro and Keith O’Dell, as well as his own upon this deadly scale. Tragically, the lives of James and Keith were lost, and Reggie Shaw’s future would be forever altered by the events and decisions of that day (Richtel 16). In this modern age of technological marvels our attention is vied for in a constant conflict. Frequently in our lives or particularly in our jobs we are called upon to execute mentally demanding and at times dangerous tasks.
In the 1970’s women were expected to stay at home and take care of the household. They were usually not expected to further their education, but instead take care of the children or tend to their husbands’ needs. In 1972 Judy Brady decided to let the readers of Ms. Magazine know how she felt about her “duties”. In her short essay, “Why I Want a Wife,” Brady uses pathos to connect and appeal to the reader’s emotions while explaining why she wants a wife.
The only woman in the world who will still cradle you in her arms even if you've stabbed her loving heart is your mother. The short story “Teenage Wasteland” by Anne Tyler is about guilt and reveals mother’s feelings towards her children. A loving mother will feel guilty for anything that happens to her children, and even for that how they feel. Mothers is the person who cares the most about her child. The story “Teenage Wasteland” tells about a common situation many families experience: a misunderstood child creates problems to his parents, not by fault, but because he feels unwanted.