Film Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

1446 Words6 Pages
12 angry men movie analysis: 12 Angry Men is a 1957 American drama film with elements of film noir, adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose written and co-produced by Rose himself. Analysis: 1. The 12 jurors all have particular backgrounds, perspective and beliefs about honesty and the boy’s role in the murder. Commonly, the jurors, who are every white male of around middle age, are not illustrative of the more extensive group, and numerous are threatening towards the young man. Rose infers that the respondent originates from a minority ethnic gathering, maybe dark or Hispanic and in view of his broken financial foundation, numerous trusts that he is capable of murder. 2. The critical role of the 8th juror: Rose portrays the eighth juror as a representative for justice who foregrounds the idea of sensible uncertainty. The way that he can't "send a kid off to die, without discussing it first," flags his…show more content…
For instance, the third legal hearer has an irritated association with his "spoiled" child whom he has not seen for a long time. Thus, he trusts that "we would be in an ideal situation on the off chance that we "took these intense children and slapped them down before they raise hell. Spare us a considerable measure of time and cash." Accordingly, his extreme way to deal with peace seems to come from his own particular troublesome association with his child. Rose notes in the stage bearings that "he has said more than he proposed. He is humiliated." His disgrace surfaces in a forceful and undermining way with alternate members of the jury. Thus different attendants likewise have individual responsibilities and encounters that incline them to respond to the confirmation in fluctuated
Open Document