While these two series talk about the life of lawyers and how they convey their ideas, deal with complicated cases, and the philosophy of right and wrong, 12 Angry Men presents the case from the jury point of view. It presents how normal people would look at such a case, how would they deal with a complicated murder, and most importantly how would they handle such a
In criminal court, the government files a case against someone for committing a crime. The person accused of committing the crime is called the defendant. The government must prove that the defendant is guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt,” which is a very high standard. If the defendant is found guilty, then he or she may go to jail or prison. (Code, 1993) Branches There are five main components of the criminal justice system: prosecution, defense attorneys, law enforcement, courts, and corrections.
Prosecutors have the very important job of representing the people in a court of law on both state and federal levels. Prosecutors are under obligation to execute the law on both federal and state levels. However, the discretion that they are afforded under United States law gives them nearly absolute and unreviewable powers to choose whether or not to bring forth criminal charges, and also what charges to bring for cases when the evidence is enough to those justify charges. Plea bargaining is another area in which falls under a prosecutor’s vast discretionary powers, they can choose to bring full charges against the defendant or they can choose to show leniency by reducing the charges or dismissing the charges altogether. The incredible amount of discretion that prosecutors have in the criminal justice system places them
The courts are charged with the responsibility of punishing offenders while the corrections implement the court rulings. Out of the three the courts are the most harmful to the criminal justice systems. Once the police have done their investigations and arrested all offenders involved it will be up to the court to decide whether the person is guilty or not. This is where the problem comes in. Many people have been judged wrongly in the courts.
The trials were also completely open, making it impossible for anyone to accuse the Allies of displaying improper and illegal behavior during the trials. The fact that three of the accused were acquitted furthermore shows the fairness of the trials (Bard 88-96). The Americans, as stated before, wanted to ensure the trial was fair and that they weren’t just acts of vengeance. To do this, they had to find hard evidence that specifically proved the Nazis on trial were
How reliable are eyewitness account? “I believe I saw him!” says the eyewitness. Nowadays, eyewitness account plays a very important part in court, as well as in the investigation of a criminal case. It is often referred to as a reliable source of evidence by the judge and jury. An eyewitness account is a description of the event, for example a criminal activity based on the memory of a bystander.
Evidence based on scientific explanations is a good evidence that can be used in the criminal justice system. In addition, these evidences based on forensic science can be very useful and critical where these evidences can free innocently convicted accused. Criminal cases such as Duke lacrosse, David Millggard, Clayton Johnson, and Talao are examples of case that forensic science helped to prove their innocence. However, there is potential possibility that these evidences of forensic science can lead to wrongful convictions when the criminal justice system subjectively look into the scientific evidences. Michel Shirley in 1987 was arrested in 1987 for the murder and rape of Linda Cooke.
The lawyers contribute to the criminal justice system by bargaining in court, questioning witnesses, and provide evidence that could help the case. This prosecution committee is very discreet, but can still give information on the case to the victim and/or person who is going against the state or federal government. Defense attorneys play their part in the criminal justice system by defending the accused in the court. They can be appointed to the case by the court if the accused cannot afford a lawyer, or they can be hired directly. They are used to the defendant 's
INTRODUCTION In common sense the Law of Torts is that branch of law which aims at regulating the manner in which people behave in civil society. The law of tort covers a wide range of situations, including such diverse claims as those of a passenger injured in a road accident, a patient injured by a negligent doctor, a pop star libeled by a newspaper, a citizen wrongfully arrested by the police, and a landowner whose land has been trespassed on. As a result, it is difficult to pin down a definition of a tort; but, in broad terms, a tort occurs where there is breach of a general duty fixed by civil law. When a tort is committed, the law allows the victim to claim money, known as damages, to compensate for the commission of the tort. This is
Law Enforcement is a specific group of people trained to enforce legislative and penal laws, which are meant for keeping order, and providing safety for citizens and property. According to an article on law enforcement careers, a law enforcement officer provides safety to the citizens by enforcing the rules of legislation. In order to provide safety, a law enforcement officer regularly arrests people who break the law, and brings them into a system where they undergo a fair trial to determine whether the accused person is guilty or not. Ordinarily, those are the main duties, but law enforcement covers even more than protection. They handle with critical jobs, which do anything from patrolling borders to investigating crime scenes.
Where there are numerous accounts of a prosecutor’s duty in the Criminal Justice system. From the cooperation from law enforcement to the recommendation of sentences to courts upon conviction, and most importantly, representing the government in every aspect. However, there are times when power takes over a prosecutor conducting misconducts that are going against the criminal law that a prosecutor has lawfully Oath to protect the civil rights of those criminal defendants. Hence, it has been seen in many accounts of court cases that prosecutor’s misconduct upon
Today our reality is loaded with wrongdoing. The general population perpetrating these violations must have an outcome for their unlawful activities. The framework set up to continuing everything reasonable and safe is known as the criminal equity framework. This was placed set up to guarantee there is reasonableness and equity served to individuals who split the laws set up by the legislature. Criminal equity is a standout amongst the most critical majors one can think about because of the need to keep the boulevards sheltered and clean.
Steven Sandstorm and Gary Eye, of Kansas City, Missouri were sentenced multiple life sentences because of the “racially- motivated murder of William L. McCay.” The cases of Gary Eye and Steven Sandstorm are one of the many examples of what some of the charges could lead up to. Charges for hate crimes includes fines, probation, associated penalties, or incarceration. If the crime is violent the suspect could end up having multiple charges,