ipl-logo

Comparing Buckingham And Hastings's 'Huge In The Play Richard III'

1230 Words5 Pages

Ahmed Ammar Albannai 2-10-2016 Honors English period D Ms. Sandy Richard III In the play of Richard III there were two major roles that affected the morale of the story. The two characters were Buckingham and Hastings. Buckingham is loyal to Richard , he is his right hand and he is willing to do anything that Richard asks him to do. Hastings is the one who’s loyal to the royal family and he is loyal to King Edward and the prince. The difference between them is that one of them is loyal in a good way and the other one is loyal in a cruddy way. Hastings is loyal in a pleasing way to the royal family , he was never thinking about betraying them specially at that time where it was really difficult to stay loyal and integrate to anyone. Buckingham was extremely loyal to Richard , and this may be a similarity between them that they were really loyal to someone , but the difference is that Buckingham was loyal in a bad way to Richard where he was ready to lie and cheat on people so he can get Richard on the crown. (shmoop.com) All over the story you can see a lot of situations where Hastings remained loyal to all the people in the royal family. He was even loyal to Richard because he is considered one of the royal family , without him knowing what was Richard planning for. Hastings was also loyal to queen Elizabeth and he didn’t allow anyone to …show more content…

He was just loyal for them because he loved them without any interests , but Buckingham was totally different than Hastings , he was loyal to Richard because he wanted a position and power from him. He believed that Richard will give him the earldom of Hereford and he did anything for him to get it. Buckingham ignored everybody in his life and trusted just Richard because he believed that he will get him to his goal even though he got warnings that Richard is a bad person specially from Queen

Show More
Related

  • John Proctor Courageous In The Crucible

    224 Words  | 1 Pages

    For example, Parris tries to maintain his religious authority over Proctor, but Proctor is disinterested in what Parris has to say. Also, Proctor confesses his affair with Abigail in order to save Elizabeth’s life. He willingly sacrifices his name in order to protect her life. At

    Read More

  • What Was Thomas Cromwell Accomplishments

    656 Words  | 3 Pages

    He served as a chief minister to the king and was given many high-ranking positions, such as the Principal Secretary, Lord Privy Seal and Master of the King’s Jewels, which made him a prominent figure in England. Thomas Cromwell was also able to gain funds for the king by dissolving monasteries One of his major accomplishments is helping the king gain authority over his marriage and giving him the ability to annul his marriage to Queen Catherine of Aragon. He managed to do so by devising a plan to break the nation’s connection with Rome and to destroy the Pope’s power over the nation’s affairs. Thomas Cromwell wanted to show that England was truly an empire, ever since the 12th century, and its leader an empire. He sought to prove his theory by basing his “facts” on a book called the “History of the Kings of Britain”.

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel's The Prince

    433 Words  | 2 Pages

    In The Prince they talked about how a king doesn’t want to be hatred by his people but have them respect him so he can’t be to nice. So a king in this book they should be stingy, cruel, breaking promises, and having a great staff of people. Stingy would be better than being nice to your people shows them that you are the king and they need to respect you and your decision. Cruel is better than being nice also if someone takes sometime from you there has to be something done about it! Morality and ethics are not a big deal to break in The Prince breaking promises so it will benefits the king is okay to do!

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Kant's What Is Enlightenment

    203 Words  | 1 Pages

    In order to solve this problem I divided the two. I distinguished the argumentation put forth in order to justify his claim from his allusions and outright name dropping of his current monarch. This distinction is extremely

    Read More

  • How John Proctor's Character Changes In The Crucible

    822 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Act 2, we see a trait of John Proctor which is not being loyal to his own wife, Elizabeth Proctor. He doesn't like the food that Elizabeth made and we see that their relationship stays faded through a conversation that demonstrates that Elizabeth doesn't trust John anymore. Also, how he

    Read More

  • Theme Of Loyalty In The Crucible

    741 Words  | 3 Pages

    One way that loyalty is shown is by the Salamite girls to Abigail, even though the girls are only loyal to her because she threatened them. “Let either of you breathe a word, or the edge of a word, and I will come to you in the black of some terrible night and I will bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder you” (Miller 19). Abigail threatens the girls and they become loyal out of fear of what would happen to them if truth does come out of them lying. Saying that they had danced naked in the woods in the middle of the night around a fire, and they had sacrificed a animal and then Abigail had drank the blood of the animal. Abigail had wished to have John Proctor’s wife Elizabeth dead

    Read More

  • Claudius Deceiving Character Analysis

    1517 Words  | 7 Pages

    Claudius doesn’t care who he uses or what he has to do to come out on top he will do anything in Spellman, 5 his power to make sure he is secure. The king’s greed and self loathe are his fatal flaws that ultimately lead to his downfall. Instead of doing things honestly and fair Claudius is a character who would rather play dirty and scheme behind peoples backs to find quick and easy solutions to his problems. Overall Claudius deceived his best friend, his nephew, and his wife to try to end up on top and in power but he ended up losing everything he had almost the exact same way that he received through a tragedy caused at the hands of another

    Read More

  • John Proctor's Flaws In The Crucible

    973 Words  | 4 Pages

    but he is actually honorable because when he was confronted about it by Elizabeth, his wife, then he told the truth to her about how he felt about Abigale and what he had done. He not only told his wife, but told the court judges about his affair so he can try to clear his wife’s name even though it mean a legal punishment and forfeiting his good name in the town. For example, when he was in the court talking to the judges and confessing his affair, John Proctor stated, “...for i thought of her softly. God help me I lusted, and there is a promise in such a

    Read More

  • John Proctor Conflict In The Crucible

    302 Words  | 2 Pages

    If he did confess, he would ruin his and his family’s reputation. John Proctor was very conflicted. He came to his wife looking insight. Elizabeth was untrusting of John because of his affair with Abigail. She said, “John, you are not open with me.

    Read More

  • A Comparison Of Richard III And Looking For Richard

    642 Words  | 3 Pages

    Language is transformed to effectively explore both resonances and dissonances that ultimately shape new meaning overtime. Texts reflect the concerns of their time, allowing Literature to mirror the values of the times. In Richard III, Shakespeare uses King Richard to align the mediaeval values established through the great chain of being during the Elizabethan era. In comparison, Al Pacino’s docudrama “Looking for Richard" effectively explores a more newer approach to King Richard ultimately suiting a more contemporary audience during postmodernism. Thus, it is through the Elizabethan era and the war of the roses, that Shakespeare was able to align and become reframed in Looking for Richard.

    Read More

  • Comparing Machiavelli's The Prince And The Discourses

    1492 Words  | 6 Pages

    In the book he looks at the historical aspects of what has happened and uses them to establish his main points. After going through what we were assigned to read, I gathered that the two most important aspects that a prince should have is knowledge and flexibility in the area of morality. Knowledge allows him to be smarter than his populace, knowing when not to be good, and the ability to combat certain cases. Being morally flexible allows him to be able to handle the ends justifying the means. It also should be noted that he believed that power is the only thing that matters and how to hold that power.

    Read More

  • Richard III Is Evil Essay

    1571 Words  | 7 Pages

    He instigates against any potential threat, and seems to be very persuasive. He minimizes his persona by hiding behind his deformity, pretends to cause no harm. Richard lies to the Mayor of London with the help of Buckingham and pretends to be a holy man who spends most of his days in prayer not worth of becoming a king. This was all a planned in order to gain his kingship. He misleads the regime and uses religion to achieve his goals as noted by Heilbrun article: “The pretense of his holiness as a mask for lust, ambition and power, is also provocative portrayed in Richard III” (Heilbrun

    Read More

  • Is Richard III Innocent Or Guilty

    1024 Words  | 5 Pages

    Historically, it is claimed that Richard III killed the two princes and held them hostage in the Tower of London to guarantee his succession to the throne. Richard III is painted as being greedy and ambitious, willing to do anything - including murder his two nephews - in the pursuit of power. Richard III’s image is synonymous with evil and ill will due to Shakepeare’s portrayal of the king in his famous play titled “Richard the III''. The dramatized acting in the play led the public to believe that the story was true - Richard was a murderous

    Read More

  • Hamlet Role Play Analysis

    1313 Words  | 6 Pages

    Over the course of Hamlet, many of the main characters engage in role play as a mechanism to achieve their own interests. Prince Hamlet is one of these characters, and his act proves to be one of the most important aspects of the play. Throughout the play, role-play (especially Hamlet’s) significantly affects the plot, and ultimately strains the relationships between several characters. Hamlet is among one of the most important characters to engage in role play. In act one, scene 5, shortly after being told that Claudius killed his father, Hamlet tells Horatio and Marcellus that he plans to feign madness, and he says, “As I, perchance, hereafter shall think meet to put an antic disposition

    Read More

  • King Hamlet In Michelle Ray's Falling For Hamlet

    1243 Words  | 5 Pages

    Michelle Ray’s Falling for Hamlet is truly a masterpiece which brings the readers to the variety of emotion as we read it. Michelle retains the name of the characters form Shakespeare’s hamlet, but few of them doesn’t have the same characterization: Fortinbras from being a prince of Norway who’s seeking revenge for his father, becomes the head of DDI. Horatio, remained his faithful best friend and schoolmate but he is not a guard in Michelle’s book, and it is his parents who work for the royal family, not him.

    Read More

More about Comparing Buckingham And Hastings's 'Huge In The Play Richard III'

Open Document