2. “There are only two ways in which humankind can produce knowledge: through passive observation or through active experiment.” To what extent do you agree with this statement? In order to answer the question in the title, let us explain the terms that seem to play an important role in developing an answer. What is knowledge and how can humans produce it? What do we understand by passive observation and active experiment? Knowledge includes everything that we have learnt through our personal experiences, skills that we have acquired during our life, access to information structured in different areas of knowledge. Knowledge is a combination between personal and shared knowledge. The adventure of gaining knowledge never ends, that is why …show more content…
By active experiment, I understand an action made to demonstrate a certain premise in experimental conditions, analyzing the results. The aim of this essay is to find an answer to the main knowledge question that is raised: ”To what extent can there exist any other ways in which humankind can produce knowledge, excepting passive observation or active experiment?”. Natural sciences is the area of knowledge that is always developing through observation and experiments. Passive observation, I might say, it is the foundation of every science. How could have Newton develop the Universal Law of Gravitation without observing how the apple was attracted by the force of gravity, and fell on his head. Extrapolating his thoughts, he realized that everything in the universe draws every other object – a gravitational pull – which is in proportion to its mass. Thus, observation was, at least until the years of the Industrial Revolution (sec. XVIII-XIX) a stronger way of producing knowledge than through active experiment. Nowadays, scientists generate knowledge through active experiment. So, the balance seems to tilt to the knowledge produced by the active
By establishing that gravity, introduced by Galileo, played a role in the orbital understandings of Kepler, Newton also presented the law of universal gravitation in application to these three universal laws of motion in his 1687 publication. Newton’s development of his law of gravity corroborated Kepler’s theory of elliptical orbits and propelled a new method in the research of physics. Newton himself wrote the sentiment that, “To the same natural effects, we must, as far as possible, assign the same causes.” The findings of Newton prompted physics research to focus on patterns in the natural world that are universally
Even though Newton had to face many struggles in his early life between growing up without a father, his mother leaving to live with her new husband, and his mother then dying he was still able to accomplish and bring many new things to the world. Many of Newton 's creative ideas and inventions he brought to the world are still used today. For example, in 1666, Newton came up with the Theories of Gravity. A few years after developing The Universal Law of Gravitation, he created the three Laws of Motion. The first Law of Motion states that every object
Knowledge is the condition of knowing something. When given it does not decrease, but will only increase. It is collective thoughts and experiences people go through. Books are the greatest source of knowledge and help develop the human mind. Knowledge also helps people not commit the same mistakes again and again.
In about one hundred years thanks to the invention of the printing press, humanity grew in knowledge so that the entire world as we know today, was practically achieved by then. In document 10, The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton by Derek T. Whiteside, …” He read and made notes on Galileo’s Dialoges… and Descartes’ Principles of Philosophy….As we turn the pages of his notebooks we can see his mind leap from summaries of his readings to his own principles and results... He began to think of gravity as a force extending as far as the moon...in those two years, a mathematician was born.
Scientific research is methodical. Created from a desire to make the unknown known, the “scientific method” was created in the 15th century based on common sense. As Barry analysis the scientific process, he says that the unknown must be made into a tool, even against one’s own ideas and beliefs. However, that concept is tenuous, so Barry uses logical situations to present the idea.
It is information that's adapted to a purpose to create emotion and meaning to the world. Knowledge should not be expected to be perfect. Knowledge is created by imaginative and critical thought. Knowledge for the future helps us think outside the box to be able to communicate logically with one another.
Hundreds of years later, Galileo’s finding was put to the test in the moon landing of 1969. Neil Armstrong, after landing on the moon, retrieved a feather and a hammer for the spacecraft he had arrived in. Armstrong dropped these objects and declared “Galileo was right” as the objects hit the surface of the moon at the same time. Galileo’s experiment proved that gravity affects all things the same, despite its
In the world, every day is different from the previous one. Something new might be learned or observed. This pattern of continuous learnings is particularly evident in the science and medical fields. While this is still true of our world today, there was a notable peak of scientific learning in the 1800s.
The more we know, the more we have to be doubtful about. The movie “The Big Short” opens with a quote supposedly from Mark Twain: “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.” It tells that the more knowledge you have causes you to overthink. Knowledge, according to Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary, is the fact or condition of knowing something with familiarity gained through experience or association.
Before talking about some different ways of knowing and areas of knowledge, it is important to distinguish what is active experiment and passive observation, explain how does humankind produce knowledge, and indicate in what other ways can humankind produce knowledge. Active experiment is the process by which an individual analyses and studies focusing on a specific topic and drawing up to a certain conclusion depending on what he or she has discovered. Passive observation is not as productive as active experiment because it is only the act of observing something happening without actually analysing and studying it deeply. More simply, active experimentation is experiencing something physically, while passive observation is learning from what other people have discovered. Humankind produces knowledge from the information gathered from active experimentation and passive observation.
Do we truly know the truth? If we do know this truth, is this truth what gathers and presents to us as what we would call knowledge? I say that indeed we do not know the truth and that rather we should be skeptic of what and how the truth determines knowledge. In this paper I will defend skepticism by providing supporting evidence from “The Problem of Criterion” to state that we should be skeptic of what knowledge is. I will first speak of “The Problem of Criterion” and how Roderick Chisholm clarifies each of the three sides of knowledge.
Whilst the knower’s perspective is always essential in the pursuit of knowledge, it’s essence is greater in some areas of knowledge than others. Perspective shapes both what we pursue in knowledge and it affects how we interpret pursued knowledge. Whilst the latter has greater influence over subjective areas such as the arts and history, the former affects even the pursuit of knowledge in more objective areas such as the natural sciences and maths. What’s more, for knowledge to be knowledge, there must be a knower. Each individual knower gains knowledge through the ways of knowing reason and emotion (amongst others); these ways of knowing shape and are shaped by our perspective.
In this world we live in, it revolves around knowledge and wisdom. As humans, we always crave for something more—more about things we know, knowledge about things we don’t know about. Therefore, we dig deeper to know more about ourselves, don’t we? Knowledge, as defined, is the fact or condition of knowing something with familiarity gained through experience or association. Every day that we face bears new experiences which we encounter for us to learn.
Even if it might provide us incorrect data or if there was a problem in the process of application, this can later be opted out and people will know what is not right and hence could search for alternative methods. Moreover, the field of Natural sciences has been based on paradigm shifts. Our knowledge of what was previously regarded as the absolute truth has been turned out to be false several times and has been replaced by relatively “more perfect” knowledge. Therefore, even if the results obtained through application could lead to results that is not in accordance with people’s expectation, this, in the long term, can possibly lead to progression of knowledge that is much closer to the absolute truth and hence the extrinsic value of knowledge will increase through