Firstly, Tybalt is a hot-headed character who is quick to react with violence. In the play, he is the one who starts the fight with Romeo and his friends, which ultimately leads to the banishment of Romeo. If Tybalt had not started the fight, Romeo would not have been banished, and he would not have felt the need to take drastic measures to be with Juliet. Secondly, Tybalt's actions lead to a chain of events that ultimately result in the deaths of both Romeo and Juliet. After Tybalt kills Mercutio, Romeo becomes enraged and kills Tybalt in revenge. This leads to Romeo's banishment, which in turn leads to Juliet's plan to fake her own death. If Tybalt had not killed Mercutio, none of these events would have taken place, and Romeo and Juliet
Tybalt was the factor in Romeo and Juliet's death as he always had aggressive behavior toward the Montagues no matter what. Tybalt hated the Montagues and had no respect or remorse for them, such as he said, “What, drawn, and talk of peace? I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee” (1, 1, 56-57). This shows the animosity he had towards them. This then leads to the house party the Capulets host and Tybalt saw the Montagues gate-crashing the party.
Tybalt has been reckless through this whole event and due to this, it gets him killed in the end, but if he didn’t gotten himself involved at all maybe had more control over his horrible anger issues Romeo wouldn’t have been banished from Verona in the first place. Tybalt’s involvement made multiple paths to disaster and Friar Lawrence’s plan wouldn’t have been ruined in the first place. Even at the party, he tried to start something. Romeo even tried to be civil with his new cousin-in-law but Tybalt was to blind to see
Romeo and Juliet Tybalt's various traits and actions are responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet In the drama “Romeo and Juliet,“ by William Shakespeare. Tybalt is to blame for the lovers deaths due to his anger against Montagues and the death of Mercutio. If it were not for the malicious acts of Tybalt, Romeo and Juliet would not have not died. One reason why Tybalt is guilty for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet is because he sends the letter to challenge Romeo to a duel and during the fight kills Mercutio and accident.
Tybalt is the one to blame for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet deaths. Tybalt was the one responsible for their deaths. When he always find romeo he wants to fight him but romeo doesn't want to. Tybalt was the one who always wanted to fight with Romeo because Romeo went to the Capulet party to find his love, rosaline. Tybalt then says to his servant “This, boy, By his voice, is a montague.
The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt is responsible for his own death because he starts the fight, he’d still be killed by the prince for starting another fight and killing Mercutio, and his angry personality makes him continue to get into fights. The first reason that Tybalt’s death is his own fault is the fact that he starts this fight just like the many others that he had
Instead of Romeo killing Tybalt out of anger he could have just threatened him in a way. Romeo putting tybalt down played a large factor on how it has led to the deaths at the end of the
Tybalt was a troublemaker and also a good sword fighter and picked a lot of fights. He fought Mercutio and killed him by accident. Tybalt was slain by Romeo because Tybalt killed his best friend. Tybalt was also mad because Romeo came to his party and thought that it was a
Tybalt (35%) - I believe that Tybalt was mostly to blame because he insisted to fight Romeo which caused all the deaths (including his) and almost everything to happen. If Tybalt never searched for Romeo, wanting to fight him, then Mercutio wouldn’t have died because Mercutio wouldn’t have a reason to fight Tybalt. This means that Tybalt wouldn’t have died because Romeo wouldn’t have wanted to seek revenge for Mercutio. Capulet and Lady Capulet wouldn’t be thinking that Juliet is mourning about Tybalt’s death and Capulet wouldn’t have moved the wedding to Thursday (Wednesday later on) because Tybalt wouldn’t have died. Additionally, Juliet wouldn’t be mourning in the first place because Romeo wouldn’t have gotten banished.
In Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, Tybalt, the House of Montague and Juliet are to blame for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. During the process of the play, Tybalt shows overwhelming hostility, this leads to the death of him alongside Mercutio, concluding with Romeo’s banishment from Verona. The House of Capulet, specifically Lord Capulet and Lady Capulet, had forced Juliet into a marriage she openly opposed. Ultimately, Juliet without without think hastily forced the Friar to aid Romeo and Juliet in their love a. The affairs of these events, caused by the thoughtless decisions made by Romeo and Juliet, leads to their untimely demise.
Juliet’s cousin, Tybalt, is one person who is responsible for the death of Romeo and Juliet. Therefore, Tybalt should be given death for his actions in Romeo and Juliet First, Tybalt was the aggressor for the entire story. He started fights and killed multiple people throughout the story. For example, the very first scene of the story is Tybalt starting a fight, setting up all the the events of the play. When facing off with Benvolio, he yells, “What, drawn, and talk of peace?
Lastly, Tybalt is the most to blame for the events that occur in Romeo and Juliet because of the the first events he caused leading to the suicides of Romeo and Juliet. The confirmation that Tybalt is the cause of the terrible events in Romeo and Juliet is shown in the play “Romeo and Juliet” when Romeo says, “Is it even so? then I defy you, stars! Thou know ' st my lodging: get me ink and paper, and hire post-horses; I will hence tonight.”
In the duel between Tybalt and Romeo in Act III, scene i of William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt is the most at fault for the tragic outcome because his impulsiveness and haste interfere with Romeo’s positive intents to unify the Montague and Capulet families. First, Tybalt’s hunger for prestige prompts him to initiate the duel between himself and Romeo, Tybalt calling Romeo “a villain” (III.i.62) prior to the duel. Romeo retaliates through subtly mentioning his amorous connection with Juliet; Tybalt argues that a Montague-Capulet union “shall not excuse the injuries/That thou [Romeo] hast done me [Tybalt]” (III.i.67-68). Here, Tybalt interferes with Romeo’s positive intent to “excuse the injuries” that Tybalt believes are Romeo’s fault. Tybalt’s only practical method of resolving the feud is to slay Romeo in a duel, which forces Romeo into desperation and puts Tybalt at fault.
Since Tybalt killed Mercutio, Romeo became furious and killed Tybalt, which resulted in his banishment from Verona and the Capulets’ hatred for Romeo. Tybalt’s actions are what caused Romeo to be banished which caused Friar Laurence to make up his elaborate plan. This makes the reader call into question, “What would have happened if Tybalt had just let go that Romeo attended the party?” If Tybalt had simply just let go of the fact that Romeo attended the ball, then Tybalt wouldn’t have killed Mercutio. Mercutio’s death was the only reason that Romeo killed Tybalt, so if Mercutio hadn’t died, then Romeo wouldn’t have killed Tybalt.
In this story it is found that Tybalt was the cause of Romeo being banished. Tybalt’s intense anger issues caused him to hold an unnecessary grudge towards Romeo. Although Romeo did nothing wrong Tybalt felt that he shouldn’t have attended a Capulet party. If Romeo had not have attended the party Tybalt would not have killed Mercutio. The terrible chain reaction he caused would have never happened.
Verona’s Fighter Tybalt is a fighter at heart whose rash decisions led to his death. In The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt is Juliet’s cousin who can be shown as fiery and irritable throughout the play. Although Tybalt doesn’t change as a character he plays a pivotal role in Romeo and Juliet. His importance is shown throughout the play because he is highly involved in the Capulet and Montague family feud.