Types of Terrorism Terrorism as a form of violence has a wide variety of targets and modes of activity, with this in mind, it can be said that different types of terrorism will inevitably arise. The international community has not therefore been able to have a one general consensus on the types of terrorism present all over the world. This paper generally focuses on the different types of terrorism based on the terrorist’s ideology and objectives. This paper also brings us to a broader global stage by categorizing the position of terrorist groups in relation to the world system. These typologies however, are not exclusive with each other, thus you will notice that some terrorist group encompass different types of terrorism. Also, it may be …show more content…
Lia subdivided terrorism into four main types corresponding to the ideological motivation of the perpetrators. The first type is the socio- revolutionary group; the common ideological basis of this group is being against the government. Next is the separatist group, being members of this group is typical to the minorities within a nation state that desire to be autonomous. They are usually ethnic minorities seeking autonomy or independence from the state commonly due to discrimination from the majority group. Third type of terrorism is the single issue group, from the name itself, the purpose of this group is to advance a specific issue. The political end they want to achieve is only based on one issue, commonly; these issues are social in nature. The last type of terrorism based on ideology Lia presented is the religious terrorism group. This type can be motivated by religious ideologies and grievances. Religious terrorists are more likely to use ‘all in’ tactics such as suicide bombings, which is made possible by religious teachings used to justify or encourage this kind of self- …show more content…
Lizardo and Bergesen consider the position of the terrorist groups in relation to the world system. This typology takes into consideration the larger international embedding of terrorist activities within the structural core, semiperiphery, and periphery division of the world system. For further understanding, it is best to define what the core, periphery and semiperiphery areas mean according to the world system theory developed by sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein. The core countries usually exploit or dominate the peripheral countries for raw materials and labor, the peripheral countries depend on core countries for capital, while semiperipheral countries share characteristics of both core and peripheral countries. Type 1 terrorism or what Lizardo and Bergesen termed as ‘terror in the core’ is perpetrated by core actors against core government organizations (Bergesen et al. 2003, 163). These core- based terrorist organizations have ideological grievances against a particular core government (Bergesen et al. 2003, 166). This means that the perpetrators of this type of terrorism stand against the present state organizations in the core which they usually see as too corrupt and does not respond to the people’s needs and grievances as citizens. Their principal goal is to gather support from the public that will result to a take-over of state power (Bergesen et al. 2003, 167). ‘Struggling
Domestic terrorism refers any forcefulness act exerted on the civilian population or the infrastructure of a particular nation. Mostly domestic terrorism is done by the citizens of the nation with the intention of coercing, intimidating the national policy. A lone wolf terrorist is a situation where a citizen performs a forceful act supporting or basing on ideology and beliefs of certain movements or groups. One person alone without any command or assistances does a lone terrorist from the group.
In the article “The Ticking Bomb”, by Wade Davis, the author uses historical events to further evident his argument of the increase global tension and poverty due to the affluence western countries. The author starts the article with the 9/11 attack and, throughout the article, he examines the cause and effect of the attack. The author concludes that the United States is an omnipotent country, as they “dominate the geopolitical scene” (4). After the 9/11 attack, Americans declare a “war on terror” (G.W. Bush), which, as the author suggests, “[is an isolated phenomenon; however, the al-Qaeda organization, the organization that cause the attack, manifest into conflicts that are getting deeper and broader]” (5). The author then introduces the
Many terrorist groups are inspired by religious or prophetic scriptures. Al-Qaeda and IS are the two groups that are related to justify their extreme actions against non believers. The IS wants to establish a Caliphate which means an Islamic-ruled state. How different terrorist groups act is informed by what they are trying to achieve. The IS, al-Qaeda and the Army of God ( a Christian anti-abortion group based in the U.S. sometimes adopt a reactionary perspective aimed at stopping or resisting social, economic, and political charges.
Today, our world has to face many crises which can not be solved in a short time such as food, water, economy, and terror. However, the terror tissue is the most challenged thing for all the governments to solve. Since September 11, 2001, not only was the US attacked by the terrorists but the other countries from over the world like Britain, Spain, Indonesia… also became the target as well, and thousands innocent people lost their lives during those surprising attacks of terrorists. Even though after September 11, 2001, US has attacked and destroyed a lot terrorists’ bases in over the world, the terrorists still survive and keep aiming to US and its allies. From the book “War on Terror” of Patrick Coaty, we will be able understand deeply how and
The FBI defines 'terrorism' as, the unlawful; use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. It has been argued that there are indeed two types of terrorist, practical and apocalyptic. Practical terrorist tend to be educated in an attempt to make a better world and have tangible goals with a practical way of achieving them. Apocalyptic terrorist primary goals aim towards the cataclysmic destruction to people, property, and the environment with the hope of fomenting the end of time and ushering in religious promises of a new world. These type of terrorists tend to be recruited from the ranks of the fearful
Two theories that probably relate the best are the interactionist and the conflict theorist. The interactionist is primarily concerned with fundamental or everyday forms of interaction, including symbols and other types of nonverbal communication. One of the main assumptions of the interactionists, which directly relates to this article, is that we act according to our own interpretation of reality. The people and domestic terrorist groups described in this article all act the way they do because their interpretation of reality is to wipe out e.g. the government, or other groups of people. They are manipulating symbols and are creating their social worlds through interaction with other group members.
The world today is facing a crisis and there seems to be no resolution in sight. The war on terrorism has been going on for many, many years and it appears as if the leaders of the world are baffled as to stop it or if nothing else, control it. Many scholars have a difficult time attempting to define a good definition for the word terrorism. Many believe it is a difficult word to define because there are so many interruptions to the word. It will depend on what part of the country one is in, but for the universal approach to the definition many believe terrorism is “the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce esp for political purposes” (Dyson, 2012, p. 19).
The term terrorism is inextricably intertwined with the notion of foreign actors unleashing widespread disaster on American soil. This notion is not unfounded and carries a very real and very dangerous threat to the US. While the US must of course be constantly vigilant with regard to the threat of an attack emanating from a foreign land, the US must also consider an equally dangerous threat that lurks in our own backyard: the domestic terrorist. Make no mistake, the use of the word domestic should by no means diminish, and should in no way normalize the malevolency these groups perpetuate. One is tempted to limit one’s thinking regarding domestic terrorism to the latest news story and how that may affect the US in the here and now.
Department of homeland security and Domestic Terrorism One of the major reasons why defining domestic terrorism has proved difficult is because different agencies approach terrorism with their different interpretations (White, 2013). The difference between the various definitions of domestic terrorism lies within the various descriptions given about terrorists’ motivations. White (2013) classified domestic terrorism as either those that are politically motivated or others that attempt greater specificity. It is however difficult to establish and define the motivations of terrorists. It is therefore necessary do in-depth analysis on terrorists’ motivation because their purpose reflects the methods and targets the terrorists are most likely to select.
After a terrorist attack of any kind there are always consequences that must be faced. Sometimes the point of the terrorist attacks is because the organization wished to send a message or to influence policy in their favor. However, after the 9/11 attacks administrators realized that the United States was not prepared for a tragedy of this kind and had little to no measures to prevent one, this lead them to create new programs and policies. Terrorist organization’s goal often comes down to one of the following: regime change, territorial change, policy change, social control and status quo maintenance. The main purpose of a terror attack may well be to influence public policy.
Ch. 9 8. Identify, define and discuss the four basic philosophical reasons for sentencing The four basic philosophical reasons for sentencing are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation. Retribution philosophy is defined as a philosophical that those who commit criminal acts should be punished based on the severity of the crime and that no other factors are to be considered during sentencing.
Introduction Religious terrorism - is the most dangerous form of terrorism based on religious fanaticism. This phenomenon threatens not only the Middle East but also States that are far beyond the areas traditionally associated with the religion of the Prophet. (Mozaffari 2005, pp.34-36). One of the key actors in the Middle East was Osama bin Laden. With vast resources, bin Laden financed the Taliban.
Sauter and Carafano (2012) states, “Ideologies of terrorist groups vary greatly, but their tactics and weapons are often similar” (p. 323). A terrorist organization is hierarchical and consist of a leader, operatives “illegals”, active supporters “legals”, and passive supporter “sympathizers” (Sauter and Carafano, 2012). Some terrorist may operate alone and carry out their own attacks (lone wolves). The tactical phases in a terrorist operation requires the following: First, the gathering of intelligence and coordination of reconnaissance exercises.
Religious movements have motivated many followers to commit violent acts of terrorism throughout the last few decades. The most memorable incident that effected America was on September 11th, 2001, when a jihadist terrorist group attacked the twin tower. As of 2013, there has been another terrorist group that seeks to disband non-Islam believers in the middle east, also known as ISIS. In relation to the class discussion, religion has and will play a major part in states development. The terrorist group ISIS seeks to convert the “other”, into following the jihadist way of life Many Jihadist rebel groups are forcefully taking extreme measures to spread the Islamic religion throughout middle eastern countries.
Methodology : The writer has applied theoretical and statistical tools so that it can be clearly understood why goverments and terrorists take certain actions which are against their interests. Conclusion : 1. One of the main mottos of terrorists is to force the state to concede to their demands (with the help of terrorist activities).