Types Of Federalism

1018 Words5 Pages
The biggest challenge for our framers was to find a solution to a problem that historically has had an abundant amount of issues. Federalism is the solution that divides the power between the states and the national government. The United States has seen several forms of federalism throughout its history, such as dual federalism, cooperative federalism, coercive federalism, and new federalism. The traditional federalism has a clear separation of duties for the state and national government. Many refer this type of federalism as a layer cake federalism. Both sides will operate within their own bubble and will not interact on a daily basis. For a good portion of our nation’s history, the state government was in charge of education, criminal…show more content…
This is referred as the marble cake federalism because this has the national government and state government mixing and overlapping their responsibilities. The major event that launched this idea of cooperative federalism is the stock market crash in 1929. The United States saw the effects of the Great Depression last well throughout the 1930’s and saw Franklin D. Roosevelt set in motion the New Deal. It consisted of programs that would help state and local government that were trying to stand tall in the wake of the great depression. What this did, was to have the national government work with the state’s government by providing money for government programs that were made to stimulate the failing economy and produce jobs all over the country. This was key as the unemployment rates in the United States was up to 25 percent. After that, the government began working with the states and the lines of separation began to get…show more content…
The federal government can do more things without raising one 's taxes, or without increasing the size of the federal bureaucracy, which is something that most voters at least say they don 't want. The national government ensures combined effort with its policies by imposing coercive federalism by threatening to remove grants from programs. What really bothers state officials, and local officials about this, is that the federal government sets the rules, but it doesn 't provide much of the money. A social issue that is talked about in “A Question of Sovereignty” points out how racism was a common thing in schools back then, and how the federal government decided to withhold funds to those schools who segregated people of colored. This was an appropriate used of their power because in my opinion everyone should be given the same type of opportunities no matter what. If it had been left up to the southern states nothing would have changed African American students would still go to segregated
Open Document