Introduction
Under the structure of the United Nations, there are subsidiary organs established under the principal organ. United Nations Peacekeeping Operations is one such organ, established by the Security Council, the principal organ. This is one of the ways in which the Security Council fulfils its functions under the United Nations Charter which provides that international peace and security shall be maintained.
Since the setting up of the UN, the establishment, deployment, and execution of peacekeeping operations which are controlled by the UN has an impressive success record. Nonetheless, several worrying shadows have surfaced. UN forces increasingly have to use force in order to keep peace. There is widespread criticism of their
…show more content…
There exist very few provisions of law that clarify what sort of protection or liability peacekeepers may face under International Humanitarian Law. The essence of IHL lies in the difference between the terms civilian and combatants . Ordinarily, military personnel involved in a peace operation enjoy the same level of protection as provided to civilians of that country when they are in the area of armed conflict without actually being a party to the conflict. However, the legal situation is less clear once UN Peacekeeping soldiers become involved in hostilities. When they take a direct part in hostilities, they lose their status as civilians and can become the object of attack. But what is not clear is at precisely what moment they undergo the transformation from civilian to combatant. It would be hard to state that any use of force used would result the peacekeepers to be termed as combatants. For example, traditional peacekeeping operations were allowed to use force in self defence and that did not necessarily result in them being termed as combatants. This ambiguity creates a debate regarding the application of International Humanitarian Law to …show more content…
Moreover, the position of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) which is that humanitarian law principles, as a body of law binds all States and armed forces by their presence in situations of armed conflicts. , also cannot be ignored. Thus, the special, protected status accorded to peacekeepers by equating them with ‘civilians’ should not in turn diminish their obligations to comply with the IHL norms as specified in the Bulletin.
Suggestions:
As it is concluded above that International Humanitarian Law is applicable to Peacekeepers and the fact that the United Nations has at previous occations accepted the applicability of at least the principles and spirit of Humanitarian law ,the following can be suggested:
That a formal document by the United Nations consolidating the applicability of International Humanitarian Law to its peacekeepers and other forces can be a great method of ensuring the application and respect of the law by all parties of the
Bosnia was a multi-ethnic country and because of this conflicts in the country arose, it involved the Serbians, Croatians and Bosniaks. (Granatstein, 2006) The UN saw how dangerous this war would become and sent a group of peacemakers to resolve the war. Canada was one of the countries chosen to help in peacekeeping and they not only resolved the crisis but they also helped the civilians in Bosnia by building roads, schools and buildings.(Granatstein, 2006) Canadian peacemakers also helped create ‘safe zone’ areas where people were guaranteed safety and the wounded were also treated in these areas.
Peacekeepers are soldiers from different countries that are sent out by the UN to supervise opposing groups after a truce or ceasefire has been worked out. They act as a buffer between two sides and prevent shootings between the sides until an agreement is worked out by politicians. Peacekeepers must be neutral and if they favour one side over the other, they will not be trusted. Furthermore, Peacekeepers work to protect civilians, guard humanitarian agents, and oversee elections in politically turbulent regions.
Unless someone/something is a dire threat to the country, peacekeeping was not obligation but an optional concern for Canada to take on. This was one of the reasons why Canada didn 't take the United Nations as seriously as it should have. Canada was always ready to contribute its all to the UN in the past but due to the lack of involvement Canada lowered on the rank.
However, since the War Crimes Act of 1996 this law has enforced breaches of the Geneva Conventions to be processed according to policy. Risk are inherent among soldiers in the military, therefore understanding what soldiers represent should empower them to uphold the standards, live the Army Values
The United Nations is a global organization that was created to prevent future wars, however, due to the peacekeeping missions, it has made it worse. Canada joining peacekeeping missions means
The United Nations included an executive committee, named the security council, who would directly control UN peacekeeping
Citizens gain an understanding and appreciation for the sacrifices people in the military make. However, despite this… without the recognition of human rights, peace still can’t be achieved, whether its individual, cultural, or gender based rights. Even though forced labour is considered a violation of human rights, the practice of compulsory military service isn’t. The United Nations Commission on Human Rights only moved towards recognizing the right of individuals to object to military service in 1987.
It had a lot of terms to try to maintain world peace. Cold war tensions between the USSR and the USA prevented a permanent UN force from being created. As an alternative, the UN decided to send temporary military forces into the world regional hotspots to keep the peace. Military officials were sent to the Pakistan-India region of Kashmir. The same action was taken the following month along the Arab-Israeli borders in Palestine.
Rules: With regard to international armed conflicts, the four Geneva Conventions (GC I to IV) and Additional Protocol I and II contain various provisions specifically dealing with both of Prisoners of War, Civilians protection to prevent any kind of violations that may happen toward them. The Forth Geneva convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War has set rules governing the issue of civilians who found themselves under enemy’s possession. Article 5 of the 4th GC has identified who are protected persons with putting conditions to be considered as protected with the privileges of having the statue of protected persons at article 27 of the same convention. Third Geneva Convention in particular has recognized group of rights with regarded to POWs such as the right to be humanely treated at article 13, correspondence at article 71, the right to gain a sufficient food in quantity and quality at article 26 and the right to not be subjected to torture and question at article 17 where every prisoner of war “when questioned on the subject, is bound to give only his surname, first names and rank, date of birth, and army, regimental, personal or serial number, or failing this, equivalent information” Moreover, the use of weapons and means that have indiscriminate effects such as poisonous gas and bombs which also would aggravate the suffering recognized as prohibited to use due to the amount of damage it causes upon civilians as well as the environment
There are many reasons why Canada is similar to many first world countries, however, does Canada have a distinct identity? Canada is an unique country for it is filled with many diverse ethnicities. Canada plays a distinct role of peacekeepers by helping and protecting many countries in times of need. Finally, Canada gets its identity from individuals living around the world for they give Canada its characteristics. This essay will show that Canada does have a distinct identity and is shown through multicultural people living in Canada, Canada 's role as peacekeepers, and the characteristics the world gives Canada.
In the UNSC’s article 51, individual and collective self-defense can be authorized by the UNSC under the framework of collective security. However, genocide is never justifiable in the eyes of the UN. Perhaps the most distinguishing feature between war and genocide is the disproportionally ability of those involved to fight back. Within war there is a certain level of understanding that those engaging in the conflict will have an ability to engage in battle. However, historically in genocides the effected groups have had little to no ability to proportionately fight against their attackers.
The US military plays a major role in the defense system of the world. Their role can be in the form of military aid, deployment of the military and deployment of the Coast Guards and the protection of people’s lives and freedom. The US is well known for providing military aid to many different countries. The aim of military aid is usually to help allies or poor countries to fight terrorism, counter-insurgencies or to help fight drug wars.
Established in 1945 after the World War II, United Nations Security Council is the most powerful organ among the six organs in United Nations with the authorized power to issue legally binding resolutions. This council consists of 15 members, 5 Permanent Members – the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia and China – and 10 Non-Permanent Members voted by the UNGA for 2 years term. According to the charter, the responsibility of UNSC is to maintain international peace and security. It determines the threat to peace and act of aggressor; moreover, it investigates any disputes between the UN Member states. The United Nations Security Council also has the military force to prevent or stop the aggressor.
Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter states that, "all member states shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, nor in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations” . It is therefore a unilateral agreement signed by member states against the use of force when dealing each other. World events however since the signing and ratification of the UN Charter have indicated that states who are signatories to the charter continue to use force against each other for various reasons. Some 25 years after the writing and ratification of the charter one cannot doubt that states have used force and sought to justify it through individual or collective self-defence claims, as well as humanitarian claims in furtherance of national agendas and to increase territory. This no doubt may have been what frustrated Franck into the stance that Article 2(4) was in its grave.
On the legal grounds, the act of humanitarian intervention is still debatable, On the one hand, there was a responsibility to limit the use of force to self-defense according to the UN Charter. On the other hand, there was strong international pressure to abide by commitments to human rights and the right to life. This has constitute tensions in an international law system, Humanitarian intervention as the justifiable act to intervene while it is contrary to the principle of sovereignty and nonintervention in the UN system and international law. An evolving international norms related to human rights and the use of force.