Do you think the new USDA standards are a tad over the top? How can we have nutritious food and it taste good too? New standards are smothering schools with nutrition guidelines on products sold and served inside the cold walls of schools all over the nation. Therefore, schools are limited in options in regards to serving a variety of foods at lunch; snacks sold now have to be less than 200 calories, and students are leaving the cafeteria hungry due to the lack of tasty foods getting served. After changing the nutrition guidelines, students are obviously not amused by these new standards.
Since the changes have taken place, schools have to serve meals each day that meet the new USDA lunch standards, allowing a minimum and maximum amount of calories to be presented as an option to a student. These standards also require whole grains, low fat dairy products, and fruits and vegetables. Foods now have to be baked instead of fried and low fat condiments can be served with vegetables.
Snacks can be served /sold at schools as long as they remain under the 200 calorie limit. Students wanting to fundraise by making snacks and selling them to students throughout the day have a hard time getting the principles to allow the fundraiser to take place for the fear of breaking the nutrition
…show more content…
Therefore schools are limited in options in regards to serving a variety of foods at lunch; snacks sold now have to be less than 200 calories, and students are leaving the cafeteria hungry due to the lack of tasty foods getting served. This essay proves these new guidelines are not a major step in the right direction towards improving school lunches; however they bring a whole new threshold of possibilities to the nutrition aspect of the overall picture of a healthy and delicious school
The dramatic change in school nutrition standards sparked a need for a food model that matched and was easy for children to
Thus, students eligible for the NSLP will not longer have access to free or reduced meals and also, children have expressed their dislike of the new lunch options served through the revised guidelines (Turner & Chaloupka, 2014). In 2012, students at a high school in Kansas made a parody video called “We are Hungry” complaining about lack of energy due to the low calorie meals served at their school for lunch (Yee, 2012). The students argued the HHFKA targets overweight children, which leaves average children feeling fatigued and leaving them hungry (Yee,
Experts say the time has come to shift school lunch away from packaged foods to locally grown natural ingredients. The Child Nutrition Act is set to expire at the end of this month. Created in 1966, the act must be reauthorized every five years. It provides $12 billion to pay for breakfast and lunch for some 30 million schoolchildren.
A recent study found that children who regularly ateschool lunches were 29 percent more likely to beobese than their peers who brought lunch fromhome. Health science has advanced greatly since theinception of the National School Lunch Program in1946. When a 2008 Institute of Medicine committeecomprising 14 child-nutrition experts examined dataon the content of school lunches in the UnitedStates, its findings were stark. The updated standards aligned school meals withthe 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans byincreasing quantities of fruits, vegetables, andwhole grains; establishing calorie ranges; andlimiting trans fats and sodium. Children consume almost half of their total caloriesat school, and the National School Lunch Programprovides
School Lunch menus need to be changed. Many schools plan on changing their lunch menus. When changing school lunches many students will lose some of their favorite foods. When the schools do finally decide to change the lunches, it needs to be a change for students, they need to be healthier and it needs to be something different for students.
Though new school lunch organizations provide a healthier, more proficient learning environment, they also promote realms of controversy over student meals. However, these conflicts are futile in comparison to constant concerns over global health issues, including obesity, anorexia, and even
In the article, “Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough?” by Rice William, the author question whether our school lunches are healthy enough. He discusses the Hunger-Free Kids Act, a campaign originated from first lady, Michelle Obama, in 2010 to help fight childhood obesity, which affects 1 in 3 Americans . It can escalate into diabetes and heart disease, which can make a childs life worse and cost the nation millions.
Determining the healthiness of food being served to students during school lunches is a very important subject. Although eating healthy is important it should not be the only factor contributing to whether or not taking away students favorite school lunches is beneficial. I don't believe that it is a good idea to take away students favorite school lunches and replacing them with all healthy foods is a good idea because of these three reasons. One, the cost of the healthier food, two, the student environment and mood of the school, and three, the fairness to the students whose only meal is the lunch they receive at school.
The principal is trying to change school lunch menu's to healthier meals. I strongly believe that this is a good idea to change the lunches because of the following reasons: healthier meals makes kids grow big and strong, it gives you more energy to move around, and it taste delicious. Schools all around should consider changing their lunches for the better of their student. This is for the better of the student to have healthy food. I will go into greater detail in the following paragraphs.
Should School Lunches Change For a long time now people have been arguing over whether or not to change up the restrictions to the lunches served in schools across America. Many different arguments have come up in recent years. School officials should not change up the school lunches because some people need more food than others, they should not be able to tell them what they can and can't eat, and finally because it will take lots of time and money to make the switch. The first reason schools should not put a limit on school lunches because some students need more food than others.
In some schools some principals superintendents have made a decision to opt out of the Healthy choice foods and make there own semi-healthy foods that kids like. To reduce waste and bring back students who have opted to pack a lunch or go off campus for fast food, his districts cafeterias have installed stir-fry stations with abundant vegetables so students can have meals made to order. and he’s added spice bars so kids can even the bland. In schools some principals and administrators are starting to take action.
It is not difficult to find rotten fruits lurking among a tray of apples and oranges. Due to their appearance, healthy options such as fruit are often discarded. It is the duty of the National School Lunch Program to provide food for students, yet the quality and taste of school lunches requires drastic
“Today approximately 16% of America 's youth are classified as obese,” in that case, changing one meal a day could prevent as much as 6% of America’s youth from becoming obese. The main issue in the cause to start making school lunch the healthy option of a students day is the undeniable fact; people love debilitating foods. Even when you are an infant in the womb, the one, only thing you crave is sugar. The best
School lunches should be nutritional and the meals at home should also be nutritional and balanced. I would say the FDA is trying to create some balance with the snacks. They are making sure that the foods we eat are actually what is promoted. This problem is affecting everyone not just children. Everyone should contribute to making nutrition an important factor in life and we should work together to decrease the amount of
Cafeteria food in schools is made to be healthy for students, but is it really healthy for students if they think it is foul and do not want to eat it? Should schools change the healthy foods to foods that students would actually want to eat? School food’s job is to be healthy and tasty to get the students through their day, but sadly school lunches tend to miss the mark on both accounts. Public schools rely on money from the government to supply food to their students, but due to several cutbacks the thing served in the cafeteria is hardly food at all. We all know the stereotypical school food mystery meat Monday or a slab of grey mush and sadly that is not too far from what it is in reality.