Ulysses S. Grant: Triumph over Adversity, 1822-1865. By Brooks D. Simpson. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2000. Print.
Brooks D. Simpson is a professor of history and humanities at Arizona State University and the
author of several books on the period of the Civil War and Reconstruction. Simpson was mostly
inspired by his father which made him sure that he could do what he wanted to do. By that, his
father took time out to organize a trip that combined visits to colleges with travels to Civil War
battlefields. Brooks Simpson viewed Ulysses S. Grant as if he was flawless; that never seemed to
do anything wrong and a person who cared for wealth. Matter of fact, Ulysses was of course not
perfect, so he did make mistakes but learned from
…show more content…
He loved his parents, but he never really liked how is father was always
bragging and his mother was reserved. Lesson learned for the future, he would
never leave his children starved for affection. When Grant was leaving for West Point, his
neighbor Mrs. Bailey, was crying and kissed him goodbye. He was both startled and grateful.
"Why Mrs. Bailey,' he responded. 'They didn't cry at our house," (11).
As a child, horses became something of a passion and in his way they seemed to understand
him. "Horses were more honest than people, or so Ulysses seemed to believe, for he gave
himself to them as he never did to his friends. He trusted them, and they responded to him," (5).
Simpson mentions Ulysses's miserable adventure at West point, being a lieutenant in the
Mexican War, sudden resignation from the army in the year 1852, and his part in the Civil War.
2
Also, the author shows that even though Ulysses was so determined by failure, lack of
confidence and depression managed to overcome it and became an icon. Ulysses
…show more content…
Rejoined the service in late 1861, when he was offered a position as a
captain in the adjutant general office to group Illinois volunteers. This gave Grant credit the rank
of colonel. Simpson was captivated in making a story of how Ulysses gradually rose in
becoming a commander of the Union armies. Detailing the intriguing and backstabbing that went
on between the civilians and the professional officers to win promotion and block possible
rivalry. Ulysses S. Grant's military career showed bravery, intellect, determination and Simpson
wrote it with sympathy but with historical facts and endurance. Grant actually had no political
ambitions. "He hated to see his name 'associated with politics either as an aspirant for office or as
a partizan," (257). But, planned a campaign that made Robert E. Lee surrender. In one of
Simpson's chapters, making his doubts understandable that any general could achieve that
victory. Grant's military strategy was very simple, it was to find the enemy attack them
immediately them hard and move on. Simpson gives Grant credit for his easy tactics,
coordination, cooperation, steadiness under pressure, and dedication of overcoming
In the book of His Excellency: George Washington by Joseph J. Ellis, the author introduces Washington, the Father of the United States, in a fresh portrait focused on the characters of Washington. This book is an impressive biography of Washington's remarkable dedication to the United States history. According to the author, George Washington is an omnipresent figure as he was growing up, described as the man in the moon who was aloof and silent. This book focuses on Washington's wartime service which became some of his major contributions to the United States, rather than merely telling the true story of Washington, its main thesis is focusing on analyzing his contributions and how his governorship had affected the American history. Washington's life is divided into three areas in this book.
SGT Daniel Bissell, a Revolutionary Spy and a Notable Non-Commissioned Officer SGT Daniel Bissell embodied what we envision as a Legacy Leader. His impact on the Corps of Non-Commissioned Officers may not be so well known today, but the actions for which he received the highest award of the Revolutionary War, evinced not only the spirit of the of the Warrior Ethos and the Army Values, but also the competencies and attributes of an Army leader. Daniel Bissell was born in Windsor, Connecticut on December 20, 1754. The eldest son of a rich and prominent family, he enlisted in the Continental Army of the United States of America with the 5th Connecticut Regiment in the spring of 1777, receiving his promotion to Sergeant in 1781.
I gathered that areas of focus within the analysis are centered greatly on the upbringing of both generals. While General Lee showed a more traditional, knightly, and privileged stance on how he was raised, General Grant portrayed a working man who has known harsh work as well as life overall. General Lee sought to preserve that which he already had, consequently paying no mind to the rest of the country. Conversely, General Grant wished for an ever-widening horizon as well as growth and prosperity for the nation. Unifying qualities, however, are less expected than one might initially consider.
General Ulysses S. Grant had a great impact on the United States both in his time as a war general and in his time as president. His role in the Civil War was instrumental to the Union victory and the strategies he employed saved many union troops and ended the war quickly. He had many wins, but also many losses and setbacks that were devastating. He learned and adapted through those setbacks and won the war and the American public. The United States would have had a much harder time winning the war and with recovery efforts afterward were it not for General Grant.
The importance of this war and need to reestablish the Union caused Grant to take new strategies when waging war. In this war Grant used tactics such as year long warfare, high tempo warfare and siege warfare to destroy the confederates. By doing this he not only secured many major Union victories, but also changed how wars would be fought for years to come. And furthermore, through these new strategies of war we can can see how Grant not only affected the outcome of the war and war itself, but also the people within the war both confederate and federal. Prior to this war, wars had only been waged seasonally so that men could operate their farms or not have to deal with the intense winters.
James M. McPherson is an American Civil War historian and also a Pulitzer Prize winner for Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. This book is packed with details but mostly about the political movements that initiated and supplemented the war efforts on behalf of the Union and Confederacy. McPherson's prose is easy to understand and he is not ever at a loss for words. This book is very long and is geared towards to the nation of readers who relish data and text about the Civil War. Along with the political overtones, he does not neglect the military details and reflects on the social aspects of the people who lived through this time.
Who Killed the Constitution is an informative book that explains how different legislature has destroyed the Constitution. The authors, Thomas E. Woods, Jr., and Kevin R.C. Gutzman, explain how every single piece of legislation that has become a law infracts the rights directly given to the people by the Constitution. Thomas E. Woods, Jr., has his own political analysis show, and he has written twelve books that criticize and ridicule the United States government (Woods, par. 2). Kevin R.C. Gutzman is a professor of history at Western Connecticut State University, and he has written four books collectively (Gutzman, par.
The Missouri guerrilla aggression shape the minds of Ulysses Grant and William Sherman, who were station in Missouri. The continuation of guerrilla attack concreted the idea in Grant and Sherman’s minds that the local population was not to be trusted and that they should pay a price. One such price was jail time to all involve and their families, women and children included. Though their time in Missouri was short, both would take their experience with them in other places during the Civil War.
In 1836 Senator Ewing secured William T. Sherman an appointment to the United States Military Academy at West Point. There he excelled academically, but had little respect for the demerit system. He never got himself into deep trouble, but he had numerous minor offenses on his record. Sherman’s military career was anything but spectacular. Unlike any of this colleagues he had never ever seen any kind of military battle while all his colleagues were out fighting he spent his time stationed in California as an executive officer.
Introduction: William Tecumseh Sherman, although not a career military commander before the war, would become one of "the most widely renowned of the Union’s military leaders next to U. S. Grant.” Sherman, one of eleven children, was born into a distinguished family. His father had served on the Supreme Court of Ohio until his sudden death in 1829, leaving Sherman and his family to stay with several friends and relatives. During this period, Sherman found himself living with Senator Thomas Ewing, who obtained an appointment for Sherman to the United States Military Academy, and he graduated sixth in the class of 1840.
As Ulysses realized his men were going through danger
The leadership and legacy of Ulysses S Grant Ulysses was born on April 27, 1822 and died on July 23, 1885. He was born in Point Pleasant, Ohio. Ulysses helped America win the Civil War and stop slavery. An interesting fact about Ulysses S. Grant was that his real name was Hiram Ulysses Grant. This war contributor was important to America because without him leading us in war it is possible that we would have lost the war which could cause us to still have slaves today.
“The Adventures of Ulysses” Conveys the Hero 's Journey A Hero 's Journey is a format or a template that most heroic stories include. It has key stages such as The Status Quo, The Call To Adventure, The Departure, Trials, Crisis, The Return and much more. It also has archetypes, the important ones include, Hero, Herald, Threshold Guardians and Shadow. The story of “The Adventures of Ulysses”, written by Bernard Evslin chronicles the journey of Ulysses trying to return to his home, Ithaca, after the Trojan War. He unknowingly angered the God of the Sea, Poseidon, who then, consequently, started plaguing Ulysses and his crew, trying to keep them from ever reaching home.
Is someone a hero they let other men die for them? Is someone a hero if they are only trying to save themselves? This does not make up a hero. In the Adventures of Ulysses starts with a crew full of men but as the story goes on more and more men die, at the end leaving Ulysses as the only survivor. If Ulysses were a real hero he would not let other people die for him.
he and his son have different personal traits that will lead his son to be a greater ruler than Ulysses. Ulysses is not tender and nice leading his kingdom to success but the people living in the company to a dislike against