Also, it prevents specific information from getting out to particular people that should not be getting it. Censorship works to limit and restrict certain things from certain people, which could be harmful to them or just inappropriate and they should not be looking, reading or writing that kind of stuff. Like for example, the WWI soldier letters were not allowed to send anything they wanted in their letters, since others could get a hold of them and use the information in them against them, like getting their location to attack. “Forbidden information included references to locations, numbers of troops, criticism of superiors and even the weather which might indicate the state of the trenches.” (Letter — P. 6 Line 3). Their letters were checked by upper-class men, who censored any detail that they thought could be harmful to themselves, and their army to make sure that
Either way, there must be adequate training to prevent certain actions from occurring by the police. The police are supposed to protect and serve, however, when the police use certain measures, then, the public are the ones who need to be protected from the same police that are put in place to do the job. When it comes to the police, there should be trust between the police and the people. When it comes to play that the people cannot trust the police with equality, then, it becomes a problem. Race should never play a role in why a person is stopped, frisked, arrested, or suspected.
Freedom of speech allows Americans say what they would like to say without getting in trouble. There are a few exceptions such as no slander, threats, national security and some pornography. This means you can’t go around hurting people’s reputations and life with lies. You also are not allowed to give threats and share government secrets. Say if you had been in the Federal Bureau of Investigation and then you left your job, you still cannot tell the secrets of the government for the reason of national security.
Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech. Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with
He also states that even though journalists can express their viewpoints freely, they should prevent offensiveness and rudeness and they should never make any decision that would affect their truthfulness. Freedom of expression is essential in the media because it is a strong indication that there is democracy but it should not pass the extent of rudeness. According to Haridakis (1999), there is a difference between freely expression your opinion and unethical commentator behavior such as delivering information with knowledge, escorted by opinion without explanation and soothsaying without heed of consequences (p. 230). Journalists’ role in the media is to educate the public with facts and leave them to make a decision based on these facts without ruining the reputation of the subjects included. There should be a better understand of the appropriate balance between the right to freedom of expression and the need to protect reputations (Boyle, 2000).
“Although the government can't stop you from joining with a group of others to make your views known, you must do it in a peaceful manner” (The Right To Gather Has Some Restrictions). Every individual has the right to express their feelings and views, however, it shouldn’t irritate others in general peace or encroach on any other person’s right in the
Lastly, people must rid themselves of any bad and unhealthy ideals. They must not feel pressured by the media, friends, family or external sources to change themselves and pursue activities that they feel uncomfortable about and are not right. They must not succumb to people’s expectations and unhealthy ideals, but instead set high (but reachable) standards for themselves to keep improving and being better. They must realize that they don’t have to be perfect and suit what everyone think of them, but instead feel comfortable in their own skin and set healthy standards to keep improving instead of being
People however may not say hateful things to someone at any time even if it is a rally. In the press people should only allowed to state facts in a news standpoint. They should not be allowed to express their opinion when people are looking for an unbiased standpoint. When watching the news people would like to know that all the news they are getting is
If I tell you a secret would you keep it to yourself or would you tell someone else? Confidentiality is the act of keeping information you are told secret. This means that the doctors are told information in private, so they need to keep the information confidential. The opposition has two sides: they say that there shouldn't be confidentiality and others say that they shouldn't be able to tell anyone in any situation. It is the legal duty of medical professionals to keep the information they are told confidential, however it is ethical in some situations where the information can be shared if necessary.
Sometimes professional writers will be asked not to approach or ask questions on suspects if they feel that any answers they may give could possibly (irritate/make worse) an (act of asking questions and trying to find the truth about something). An easy way to tell if the story ignores and disrespects someone's privacy too much would be to imagine yourself in their position, would you want people knowing information about your life to the extent it is showed/represented? Most true TV programmes try to remain away from someone's personal life if they feel it may just be for the public to read about but doesn't affect them directly, however, sometimes professional writers will go to any extent and ignore and disrespect someone's personal privacy in anyway possible to get the best possible story. For example, the News Of The World were part of a phone hacking (shameful and disgraceful act or situation) where they gained illegal access to a missing girl's voicemail, listening to her messages and collecting information they would later turn into a report. They continuously came up with new stories for their newspapers and reporters and no one knew or could understand where they were getting such exact information from.
In this article Swinny the author is not one to judge through anything but does also believe this will benefit many officers. The reason Smiddy believes that is because not all officers will be getting judged and knowing not all officers are the same and are very equal with one another.
The book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury shows censorship throughout the book to keep citizens in the dark about matters they should know about. The government does not want their citizens to know the reality around them. The reason given for censorship is to ensure the happiness of their citizens. Anything involving poems, stories or any piece of literature is prohibited. The idea is that people won’t be able to get ideas of revolting, personal opinions that are debatable and prevent knowledge spreading about what’s going on in there reality.
The U.S. criminal justice system should not be allowed to used jailhouse snitches or informants, because this is at a disadvantage to defendants. This practice should not be eligible to be used for all types of crimes. To see justice done in any country, one must make sure that everyone gets a fair and impartial trial out of the system. If we disagree with prosecutors using snitches, then defense attorneys will be held up to the standards as well. If the defendant is innocent, defense attorneys need not to be worry to pay for testimony from jail inmates.
Never disclose your own personal information on public sites, as well as that of any other FDF member without their permission. It is also crucial to not disclose any FDF organization information, such as; events, collaborations, meeting/conference discussions and any other communications that were the privy of FDF members unless that information was approved for disclosure to a specific person or the general public. Also respect the privacy of anyone that FDF may have or be in collaboration with and their intellectual
I agree in the medical field or within law enforcement a persons confidentiality should not be protected, especially when the person is a harm to themselves and the community that they live in. For example, sexual predators or someone intending on doing harm to another isn’t afforded the same protect confidentiality as a person expressing a personal concern. Confidentiality can be violated when serious threat of harm is suspected, the clinician has the moral responsibility to protect the community from any person suggesting that they may do harm to himself or herself or another person. Dr. Ruth Bagshaw decision to notify law enforcement of her patients intent to possibly commit physical harm to young girl is a clear indication of why confidentiality