Uncertainty Reduction Theory 2 Uncertainty reduction theory raised my interest when I learned how it impacts people differently. Some people are able to live with uncertainty, while others simply cannot go a day without trying to reduce their uncertainty of someone or something. In 1975, uncertainty reduction theory was created by Charles Berger and Richard Calabrese (147). Their goal was to explain how communication is used to reduce uncertainty when meeting with a stranger for the very first time. Berger and Calabrese (147) believe that when strangers first meet their hope is to increase predictability in an expectation to get something out of the experience. This theory is useful in day-to-day situations, especially in a classroom …show more content…
In the situation of the class getting into pairs with practically strangers, I think that it could have explained more on what the non-verbal cues meant and how the individuals may perceive them. Limitations to this theory, I believe, include not knowing how to measure how a persons anxiety is to be evaluated. I think this is one of the main reasons there was not too many sources on Uncertainty Reduction Theory 6 the specific topic I had picked out. In being critical with this theory I do believe that it could have dived in deeper with how people with anxiety tend to react when first meeting others. It did not have too much information on how others actions can effect individuals who have a hard time reducing uncertainty. I think that critics think that more people can reduce uncertainty quickly and they do not look in depth at the effects trying to reduce uncertainty can have on a specific person. I believe in gathering some people with an anxiety disorder and having them talk to others without one would be a possible way to watch for clues on how they interact and possibly reduce uncertainty or do not. Going back to the situation mentioned in the begging, one person with an anxiety disorder talks to someone who does not have anxiety, pair someone without anxiety with another person without anxiety, and then pair people up who both have an anxiety disorder and see how they answer the questions that were given. I think that this would be an ideal way to measure how each pair acts and if their uncertainty reduces, stays the same or even
This will also become useful when coming to write coursework plans as I will already have a lot of the information at hand and won’t be having to try and remember information from lectures, instead I will have it all written down in a way that I understand and is useful to me. This is also useful as anything that I have taken away from a lecture I can read into more in-depth at home or research anything that I didn’t understand and re-write in a way that I will understand for future reference. This also backs up my read/write learning style. I can use diagrams and pictures where applicable to demonstrate/understand information, not study or read for long periods of time, use study material that uses all my sense i.e. videos, diagrams, field visits, lab work, speaking to lecturers about coursework with my first draft and seeing all feedback as being positive. This will help me to learn by not just sitting and reading in lots of information, it is a much more practical way of learning which links back into my kinesthetic learning preference and backs up the learning style theory of a kinesthetic learner (VARK, 2015).
There are also downsides to this method of research. There can be an observer effect, when someone is staring at you do the research, observer bias, when someone has a background, and you could also have no control
Over the years, humans have evolved in many ways, but some patterns are recurring in the nature of humans and these patterns give us a chance to predict and to divide behavior into set timelines and phases. Similarly, all human relationships can be divided into stages also using some predictable events. Such a prediction of behavior, was invented in the form of a theory, by Professor Charles Berger and Richard Calabrese in 1975 (SUNNAFRANK, 1986). The theory was named the “Uncertainty Reduction Theory” (Hogg). The theory goes on to state that when two individuals begin to interact at first, they have some apprehensions and questions about the other which they normally resolve by asking certain questions.
The movie, The Breakfast Club, is about five wildly high school students who spent Saturday detention together. The principal of the school, Mr. Vernon, told them to write an essay about why they received a detention and "who they think they are. " But rather than writing one, the teenagers coming from a dissimilar social group began to share their thoughts with each other throughout the day and understood that they are not as dissimilar as they initially assumed. Brian is portrayed as "The Brain" and he followed the stereotype of being a "nerd" because of his sensible clothing, good grades, and healthy nutritious lunch. Claire is seen as "The Princess" with the stereotype of a "prom queen" because of her stylish clothing and her popular standing in the school.
Established in 1975, the Uncertainty Reduction Theory indicates that when meeting someone for the first time, people are usually motivated to reduce uncertainty. Berger and Calabrese
My theory is the Uncertainty Reduction theory. The program was developed in 1975 by Charles Berger and Richard Calabrese. It is a communication theory from the post positivist tradition. It is also one of the only communication theories that specifically looks into the initial interaction between people prior to the actual communication process. The theory asserts the notion that, when interacting, people need information about the other party in order to reduce their uncertainty.
Doubting all things helps people be more cautious about the things they believe in, thereby making them less susceptible to deceit. Methodological doubt enhances rationality and reason as it ensures that an individual relies on reasoning to ascertain the trueness or the falseness of the knowledge they acquire. Methodological doubt implies that we cannot trust the senses and how they shape how we experience the world as a baseline for gauging the truthfulness or otherwise of the knowledge, opinions, and beliefs other people or we
It was 1:00 pm when I arrived at Wanamaker Elementary School. Patiently I waited outside the door. When I was finally let inside the classroom, I was welcomed by a mixture of bright smiles and blank stares. Mrs. Stark then introduced me to the class of twenty third graders. After she introduced me to the whole class, I quietly made my way to the back of the class.
Criticism on Social Learning Theory Introduction Social learning theory is a theory related to classical and operant conditioning, which proposed by Albert Bandura in 1977. According to Albert Bandura, people are active agents in learning while they use cognition and social interaction in learning (Rogers, 2010). Albert Bandura considered that people are living in the environment, therefore, human behavior should be studied in social context rather than in laboratory (Bandura, 1977).
In general, a narrow focus on only one aspect of learning produces narrow thought. I
As adult learners learn new concepts or ideas it reinforces or lessens pass interpretations and/or outcomes, or in
The small number of students allowed the teacher and paraprofessional to have a more personal relationship with the student and understand their needs better. A weakness of the self-contained setting is the differing levels of exceptionalities. There were about five students that I feel could have been in an inclusive classroom. The other five still had differing disabilities that made it difficult to meet each of their needs. I think it had to do with the clumping of grades together.
8 high levels of professionalism 9 improved student retention and learning. – 10 benefit the community - parents and other stakeholders in shared decision making, interpersonal skills, and management skills 11 inexpensive -change in locus of decision making rather than a large increase in
Models are generalizations of processes, patterns and systems of human interactions and experience. Models can be seen and used in our everyday life. They make life easier in a way – they help us in understanding concepts that can be related to all the parts in our lives. The good thing with models is that they can provide a very clear explanation of a certain concept, because they leave out the things that might make the explanation more complex. This gives us general rules that are widely used.
Both students and teachers can now find facts within seconds. This can be very useful when explaining and debating topics.” As we all know, kids in this day in age have so much power in the palm of their hands they can get any piece of information they need in seconds and they should be able to use that power. Another reason kids should be able to use their smartphones in class is that teachers now are able to create assignments which kids can complete on their phones.