1. Summarize Polybius’s understanding of the checks and balances in the Roman constitution. Why does he think it is one of the most stable forms of government? Which of the three aspects of the Roman constitution (monarchy, aristocracy, or democracy) does he think predominates in the Roman Constitution? Polybius believed that this system of checks and balances made the Roman constitution one of the most stable and long-lasting forms of government in the ancient world. According to Polybius, the Roman monarchy provided stability, while the aristocracy represented the interests of the rich and influential classes, and the people's assembly (the democracy) supplied a voice for the ordinary people. He believed that the mix of these three elements
15.What were the major contributions of Roman civilization regarding borrowing from the Greeks, standardization of an imperial language, and standards in law and politics? 16.What does the term Pax Romana refer
The authors of the Constitution created a balance between federal and state government by creating federalism or a division of powers with checks and balances while maintaining the separation of powers. That being said, the Virginia Plan of having every state hold a two-house legislature was debated against the New Jersey Plan that entailed a single house Congress (Foner, 2014). The end result was a two-house Congress in which each state could then have two senate members that are required to serve for one term of six years and a House of Representatives in which member were elected directly by the people every two years. This system made sure that each population was represented equally despite one state being larger than the other (Foner,
The U.S. Constitution has set up a system of checks and balances for each of the three branches of government to check and balance the other two. This system is to ensure that no branch becomes too strong. The legislative branch consists of the senate and the House of Representatives. The legislative branch checks the executive and judicial branches as well as they can overrule a presidential veto by a two-thirds vote, impeach the president, etc. it is the branch debited with creating our structural laws within society.
In document A according to the Greek historian Polybius he talks about the democratic system of governance in Rome. Polybius kept records during the extensive Roman expansion between 167 and 119 BCE held a great admiration for the Romans and highlighted their rise to global dominance. His
The Constitution was written in 1776. The reason why the Constitution was written is that the Founding Fathers did not like how the Articles of Confederation was going. They decided to reorganize the Articles of Confederation into a new document. So in July, they set up a convention and they agreed and disagreed about many things. Overall though, they were able to finally draw up the United States Constitution.
The meeting called the Constitutional Convention that ended up creating the U.S. Constitution lasted for four months. Tyranny is when a person or group of people rule over others with cruel and unusual methods. Tyranny can happen with one rule or multiple, they can take the power, or be born with it. This means tyranny comes in many shapes and sizes. The U.S. Constitution guards against tyranny by splitting each government into three branches, splitting power multiple times within each branch, and letting each part of the government check and balance each other.
Polybius goes on to say, “no one can say for sure whether the constitution is an aristocracy or democracy or despotism” in Document A. He then explains how the Roman Republic was each of them, an aristocracy, a democracy, and a despotism, for various reasons. One of these reasons was that, at times, the consuls, or the magistrates, and the Senate had more power than the Assemblies, but in different situations, it was the opposite. This shows that even Polybius, a man who was actually alive during the Roman Republic, didn’t know how to label
The one issue that I see with the Federalist Papers that are affecting the United States today are the Checks and Balances. James Madison explains and defends the system. The delegates tried to make sure that they could limit the power of the three branch of government. To make sure that no branch became to powerful than the other.
The ways the Constitution strikes a balanced authority is by all the different principles which the US was built on. During this transition for the declaration of independence to the present is shows how the Constitution has molded the US. And we will discuss the figure's in America's history have shaped the US. In the following paragraphs we will discuss these points. First, discussing how America's figures have shaped the country.
When creating the Constitution, the framers feared that the national government had been given too much authority. They incorporated Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and Federalism in the Constitution to prevent this possible issue. These concepts and philosophies are an important part of our constitutional framework, and serve a valuable role in our government. In Articles I through III, the Constitution lays out the instructions for the three branches of government.
John Adams said, “Liberty once lost, is lost forever.” This is the main reason the American Founders placed so many safeguards in our nation’s Constitution. Many ideas and theories the founders used when writing the Constitution were from philosophers of the Age of Enlightenment. Specifically, the French writer, Baron de Montesquieu was perhaps the most influential with his political ideas (We the People: The Citizen and the Constitution 25). The founders created the three separate branches: Executive, Judicial and Legislative, to ensure that America is never again governed by a tyrant; however, an intricate system of checks and balances is necessary in order to ensure the equality of these branches.
The United States Constitution, written in 1787, is one of the most influential documents ever created and has continued to stay relevant for over 200 years. The Constitution was proposed in order to replace the ineffective Articles of Confederation, which previously held the newly freed states together. The main goal of the Constitution was to unite the states together under a strong national government, outlined within the document. Between 1787 and 1788 when the Constitution what ratified, two main political groups arose with opinions in regards to the Constitution. They were the Federalists and the Anti Federalists.
How did the Constitution of The United States of America keep America from being a tyrannical government? They used a multitude of different methods such as checks and balances,federalism, separation of powers, and equal representation of states. These systems and branches are essential for the government, because unlike England where they have a monarch or a tyrant such as King George the third. While we have a group of men who govern the same as England but instead of what the ruling power says goes America asks the citizens what they want before they give a bill or a law to help the common good with doing to best good for the greatest number. What the Founders of our nation put in place was very complex but simple at the same time, they used a system of checks and balances.
In 1787, seven key figures known as the founding fathers in United States history came together and wrote the US Constitution. These men were George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, James Monroe and Benjamin Franklin.(Kettler) They decided the republican form of government would allow for the best outcome in the United States. With these intentions, they planned for the more educated, which in this time meant more wealthy, to have more influence on the decisions being made. The way that they laid out the voting system was to listen to the states decisions but if the electoral college, composed of more educated people in society, disagreed with their decision then they had the right to overturn the
In a representative democracy, citizens choose representatives to vote on laws and make political choices. In ancient Rome, many political leaders and historians claimed that the government was a democracy. However, Rome was never truly a democracy, due to their unfair government organization, and lack of democratic citizenship. In terms of government career holders, and as regular citizens, some groups of people were more powerful and privileged than others. To start off, the government of ancient Rome was far from democratic.