Written Assignment #1- Module #3
Topic #1: Gift vs. Inheritance
Question #1: Identify the availability of exemptions for gift and estate taxes? Answer: There is an exemption for gift and estate taxes called the Unified Credit Exemption. This exemption is a lifetime credit, which was established in 1976 and has since increased frequently to match inflation (Jacobson, Raub, & Johnson). Currently the credit available is 5.43 million dollars and spouses have the potential to fully utilize their exemptions though the establishment of limited portability (Devliger & Carmona, 2012).
Question #2: Can an individual transfer some assets to a trust and count it as a gift? Answer: Yes. Since the Crummey case in 1968, transfer made to a trust can
…show more content…
Within this co-ownership, the portion of the property that belongs to any given individual is considered to be controlled by that individual fully. As a result, even though co-ownership is in place, any individual in a tenancy in common has the legal right and the ability to freely transfer their interest to another individual. Therefore, their interest can be gifted, sold, or given through an inheritance upon the current owner’s death. Since the transfer of the property is typically not restricted, the transfers would fall under the unified credit exemption, the annual exclusion, and the step-up or carry over basis, based on …show more content…
For example, while both spouses are alive, both parties must consent to the transfer of the community property. In addition, the annual gift exemption can be combined and fully applied (since there is equal ownership), allowing for the spouses to receive the maximum exclusion for gift transfers (Leimberg, Shenkman, Katz, Kandell, & Miller, 2015). In contrast to the requirement for consent, upon death a spouse may transfer their share in the property as they see fit, however it is often transferred to the spouse.
Topic #3: Wills
Question #1: What happens if you do not have a will? Answer: if someone passes away and they do not have a will, their estate will enter intestate procedures. Each state has different procedures for handling assets these assets, but the fundamentals are technically the same. Within most states a percentage of the assets (ranging from half to two thirds) will go to the deceased children, with the remaining going to the spouse. If one of the parties mentioned above are non-applicable, the assets would shift fully to the applicable party. Complication may arise is there are no children or spouse alive. When this occurs, the state flows down the family tree (sometimes as far as the decedents of the deceased great-grand parent) in order to find and locate living relative to give the assets to. If this search is unsuccessful,
The court indicates that determining whether something is a gift or not depends on the intention of the transferor (Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 34) and the lack of any legal or moral obligation to make such a payment does not establish that as a gift, especially if the payment proceeds from “the incentive of anticipated benefit” of an economic nature. It is irrelevant if the donor wants the item. The court stated that the motives behind the gift are significant in this case, and the court believes that the car was gifted as a compensation for the past information Berman received and as an investment for the future
The Trust We discussed the trust private paying for Kathy to reside at the Hensgen Home. This is an option according to Joe Baldwin. Joe is requesting a mock CPT be completed to determine Kathy’s annual cost to private pay at the Hensgen Home. 3.
In both forms of property ownership, each spouse will hold a half interest in the home with a value of $225,000 and a basis of $150,000. When one spouse dies holding this interest, the other will receive the entire interest with a higher basis. When the property is held as joint tenants, only the half that is held by the deceased spouse will receive a “step-up” in basis. This will leave the surviving spouse with property with a value of $450,000 and a tax basis of $375,000. When the property is held as community property, the entire property will receive a step-up in basis as
Instead, list specific beneficiaries such as alternate beneficiaries or residuary beneficiaries. Estate planning is difficult and there is no reason to make it more difficult. So, keep your beneficiary pool to a precious few and specifically list each beneficiary. In the end, nothing will be left to interpretation and your property will transfer
Mark the right option followed by entering the name of the person in the appropriate space in the section 6, Consent by Person with Right to Designate Primary Residence. Findings, section 7 requires selection of one choice by the judge among three listed there about the acceptance or refusal of the
In such case, I think they might end up going to fall under suitable person appointed by the court. I think the court should add the “significant others” on the list, but they will need to prove to the court the relationship between decedent.
Ownership of real or personal property by at least two individuals in which each claims a undivided interest for the whole and each has the right of survivorship. A joint tenancy is created by use of a deed or
And the illustration of a property transfer by a spouse to a third party that satisfies an obligation or a liability of the other spouse, which was indicated one type of transfer by a transferring spouse to a third party on behalf of a nontransferring spouse within the meaning of Q&A-9, did not implicate the primary-and-unconditional–obligation standard. So the primary-and- unconditional-obligation standard is not an appropriate standard to apply to determine whether a transfer of property by the transferring spouse to a third party on behalf of the nontransferring spouse within the meaning of
In the year 2015, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had an interview with two reporters from two reputable news sources. Mark Kennedy, from the Ottawa Citizen and John Ivison from the National Post. During this interview, the two brought up key points from the Prime Minister’s political platform and his experiences during the election, such as the votes he has lost, building his political cabinet and the change he is willing to bring to the citizens living in Canada. One of the changes he is willing to put forth is the $3 billion tax break for the middle class. A tax break reduces the amount of taxes society must pay towards government revenue.
Prince, Madonna and Slim are the legal owners of an estate in land and holding in trust for themselves and Fat Boy. As they all have an equitable interest. Fat Boy cannot be a legal owner as he is under 18. The joint tenancy can never be severed at law , but it may be possible to sever it in equity, allowing Fat Boy to sell his interest in the property by applying to the court because the court has the power either to make an order determining the parties’ respective shares, or to make an order for sale under s 14 TLATA 1996.
Sam and Jess were the legal and equitable owners of the property due to the transfer of conveyance into both of their names and the express declaration that they wish to hold the equitable title as joint tenants (JT’s). However, Jess’s letter to Sam may constitute as a severance of the equitable title, meaning they will go from JT’s to tenants in common (TIC). Under sections 1(6) and 36 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA) states, that where there is shared legal title, the persons must hold share it as JT’s. The letter will constitute as written notice and sufficient severance under section 36(2) of the LPA as long as the letter passes the criteria of severance, that is that it is that it has been served to all of the JT’s and there’s an intention for immediate severance.
Creditor beneficiaries are a common form of third party beneficiary contract. For this type of third party right in a contract, there must either be an existing debtor-creditor relationship or one established, such as hiring a debt collector to collect what someone hasn't paid for completed work. Assumptions of mortgages are a type of third party beneficiary contract, though not all lenders will permit this. Donee beneficiaries occur when someone is entering a contract to give a gift to a third party. Some of the most common donee beneficiary contracts are life insurance policies, where one person enters a contract with a life insurance company to give money to the beneficiaries upon the death of the person entering into the contract with the insurer.
In this essay, issues on equitable interests, fixtures and chattels and finder’s rights will be analysed. Carol will be then advised accordingly. Primarily, we need to establish whether Carol has any interests as per s1(2) LPA 1925. Carol contributed to the purchase, she has an equitable interest in the property as per s1(3) LPA 1925.
When considering types of trusts in Arizona, most will find themselves wavering between the revocable trust and the irrevocable trust with little to no concrete information regarding how they differ. What is the difference between a revocable trust and an irrevocable trust? The Main Differences Between Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts: Flexibility: the opportunity to make changes to the trust.
If property qualifies for a state’s exemption or a simplified probate process, probate is inapplicable and it is unnecessary to devise methods to avoid probate. Some of the methods of avoiding probate are the following: Revocable Living Trusts, Joint Tenancy and Tenancy by the Entirety and Naming a beneficiary. Transferring assets outside of the probate process can not only save the estate a lot of time and expense, but can also help loved ones avoid years of legal