In this case, we hear about Susan, who is the president of the United Food Corporation, a wholesale grocery company. A government agent, Tim, discovers unsanitary conditions at the warehouse, caused by a United employee. Will, the vice president of United assures, Tim, that the issue will be taken care of and it will not happen again. Will then hires a cleaning company by the name of Beta Cleaning to clean up the warehouse for $15,000. Beta Cleaning begins the job and discovers quickly that the job is going to be way more complicated than they originally anticipated. Beta then agrees to complete the job as long as Will agrees to paying them $25,000. Will, verbally agrees to this because he has a tight deadline approaching to pass the upcoming …show more content…
This could be considered a crime because corporations are usually liable for the crimes their employees and agents commit within employment. So, for this case to actually be considered a crime, the prosecutor would have to argue that that the corporation could have prevented the act or had knowledge of the act. In this case, the unsanitary conditions could have been easily avoided. As the vice president of the company, Will could have prepared in advance for the inspection. He also is a high-up, authority figure who should have known better than to wait for the conditions of the warehouse to become increasingly worse. He knew when the deadline was yet, he continued to let the unsanitary conditions slide. Although Will is just the vice president, he still holds a fairly big role for the company. Therefore, he is considered a “high management agent” and resulted in letting the crime be authorized and committed. The United Food Corporation can also be held accountable because as a corporation, they failed to impose specific duties by law. As a grocery store, they are selling food and items that people are going to consume. Without the grocery store remaining clean and sanitary, they are violating the FDA’s mission. According to FDA.gov, there mission is to primarily ensure public health by the safety, efficiency, and security of human and veterinary drugs among other variables. In …show more content…
This is true because the corporation is held liable regardless of who from the company committed the acts. The company also failed to impose specific duties of the law within the corporation. Susan can also be held accountable because she is the president of the company and holds a position of authority. According to the responsible corporate officer doctrine, she is held liable. There were also contracts breached, the bilateral contract and executory contract. With that being said, United Food Corporation still will owe the $15,000 to Beta
Another employee who has been at the factory since she was child, visiting her father who was a watchmen at the time, is Gloria Sifuentes. Gloria used to watch her father make his rounds and loved helping him make them, and even as a child she couldn’t wait to work at the factory. “I thought the factory was fascinating as a kid,” said Gloria. Sfuentes now works at Sidney Sugars as a white boiler, which means that she boils the juice from the beets to a certain consistency so the beets drop white centrifugals, which get cut
Who was responsible for the loss of the heater? Fully explain your answer. I believe that the Company Sunkissed should be completely held accountable for the stolen pool heater. First off, a common law rule called the perfect tender rule was not taken as seriously
Company Q has not placed any blame and accusations on any one set of employee due to its lack of investigating in concern in more detail. This is the reason why Company Q does not want to give to the local food bank. Company Q suspects that their employees are committing fraud, but they have no proof of this happening. I have the impression that company Q is being socially irresponsible by not investigating this concern in more detail, because Company Q only harbors suspicion that the employees are committing fraud, this is hurting the local community and depriving the food bank of much needed food donations. Company Q should investigate the employee and or monitor the employees more closely to find out if their suspicions of fraud is in fact justified or not justified.
The central issue in this case is Hershey’s obligation
I think everyone on the fault because everyone did not show responsibility and did their job
The Food and Drug Administration was created to prevent the “manufacture, sale, or transportation of adulterated or misbranded or poisonous or deleterious foods, drugs, medicines, and liquors, and for regulating traffic therein, and for other purposes.” (Carpenter). After many years of trying to establish similar acts to help protect the health and safety of the citizens of the US (and some being approved), President Theodore Roosevelt signed the Food and Drug Act in 1906, which would later develop into the FDA that we know today. The FDA was advocated by Harvey Washington Wiley, the chief chemist at the Bureau of Chemistry. The FDA was the endpoint after years of countless efforts to get the government involved in the health and safety of
The company failed to ensure that the walls of the excavation be sloped or supported as required by regulation. 3. Why was it “unavailing R. Williams to argue that employees must take greater care to avoid placing themselves in harm’s way”? What role, if any, should employees’ actions have in determining liability under the OSH Act? According to our text, a claim like this misconstrues the purpose of the OSHA safety standards.
This is at any cost no matter what illegal, monstrous behaviors they engage in while at work, or how charming they are in their everyday lives outside of work they as humans have morals which they should carry with them to their jobs creating a corporation based on excellent morals verses one that has all the defining characteristics of a psychopath. The government is also responsible for the actions of psychopathic corporation because they do not mandate punishments severe enough causing the corporations to follow the rules and regulations allowing for little to no punishment for cases of corporate
At her job, she always as to be occupied with a task, even though her manager does nothing all day. Conditions for the employees are unfair. Their break room is disgusting and it is reminded to them that it is a privilege, as well as their lockers can be searched anytime, they’re not allowed to gossip, and new and possibly current employees will be tested for drugs. Ehrenreich has trouble keeping up with her payments with the wages she is earning and can not imagine how her coworkers are able to live like this, however she later learns that they are also barely making it by. She decides she will need to gain a second job and becomes a waitress for another restaurant, Jerry’s(not its actual name).
The contaminated water supply then resulted in the death of little children, and parents had to bury their own children. Therefore, there is no reason not to have prosecuted the two corporations as all the elements of negligence are displayed here. Consequently, both corporations whether it was intentional or accidental, committed an act of negligence. Although nothing can be done to undo the losses, both companies must have apologized and compensated the damages
This proves that throughout the case, Cendant Corporation wasn’t acting fully ethical nor with the desired fiduciary actions to their investors and the auditing team in this case being Ernst&Young. Aside from the trust being broken apart between both, there was never a sign of an internal control inside Cedant. Therefore, there shows that the corporate governance for Cendant Corporation didn’t have signs of existence as well. Most frauds that were occurring before the implementation of the SOX-2002, had top management such as in Cendant that didn’t have care for the ethical performances as much as in today’s corporate world with more regulations in hand by the government. At the end, Cendant had filings against them concerning their corporate governance
Introduction - If you’re an aspiring Airbnb host, it is of paramount importance that you ensure all your renters are comfortable in their temporary lodgings. That means making sure the listed property is warm, secure, and, above all else, clean. Keeping your rental property clean can be a difficult task, especially as some travelers can be a tad more careless than others, but it must be done if you are to satisfy clients and maintain a good reputation on Airbnb. In order to help you keep your tenants comfortable for the duration of their stay, I have prepared this list of some of my top tips for maintaining a tidy Airbnb space.
1) Assigns workers their duties and inspects work for conformance to prescribed standards of cleanliness. 2) Investigates complaints regarding housekeeping service and equipment, and takes corrective action. 3) Obtain list of rooms to be cleaned immediately and list of prospective check-outs or discharges to prepare work assignments. 4) Co-ordinates work activities among assignments.
He mentioned that just individuals have responsibility and a corporation is an artificial person and so it has artificial responsibilities, however the similar situation cannot be obtained for whole business. He says that, firstly, we should ask what it refers for whom to examine the doctrine of social responsibility of business. He believes that a corporate executive is an employee of the business in a private property sys¬tem and his employers are his re¬sponsibility and says “That responsi¬bility is to conduct the business in accordance with their desires, which generally will be to make as much money as possible while con¬forming to the basic rules of the society, both those embodied in law and those embodied in ethical custom.” The primary responsibility of corporate executive is as an agent for owners of corporation or individuals who constitute charity
Kenneth Lay, Mr. Jeffrey Skilling and the company CFO, Mr. Andrew Fastow .The management level of Enron Corporation had misconduct the code of ethics and fail to performing the duties of a corporation which is telling the truth of the situation of a corporation .Instead , they tried try to hide the truth of their financial status and create a false prosperity situation and make the public believe on them in order to support their shares prices . The misconduct of code of ethics by the management level by Enron corporation has led to the another question – The ultimate responsibility of a corporation towards society ? The ultimate responsibility of a corporation is to gain profit or become a stable economic unit ?