United States V. Lawson Case Study
The case United States v. Lawson, 2009 WL 1916063 (Ky. 2009) deals extensively with FRE Rule 404(b). In the case four different items of evidence are viewed for admissibility under Rule 404. The case focuses on three co-defendants who are charged with five counts of bribery conspiracy and three counts of conspiracy on construction or repair of state roads and highways. The motion viewed focuses on Nighbert, a co-defendant, and his objections to admitting certain evidence against him under Rule 404(b). The four items are: an FBI report of an alleged conversation Nighbert had with the mayor regarding his son, failed disclosure on financial forms of his ownership of a company, an FBI interview concerning Kentucky road contracts and Nighbert, and a newspaper article regarding the defendant’s property and nearby construction. Nighbert objected to these items, claiming they were irrelevant, immaterial, lacking probative value, confusing, and prejudicial. The items presented were to be introduced as evidence showing intent Nighbert had to take the bribery money and obstruct justice. The court found the first two items of evidence admissible, however under Rule 404(b) the last two items were inadmissible. …show more content…
The prosecution introduced the evidence to show obstruction of justice against the past investigation, leading to the assumption that there would be obstruction of justice on the current case. The evidence was found probative in the defendant’s intent to obstruct justice. Due to the type of conduct at issue being the same as the evidence it showed intent to obstruct justice in the current case as well, because of this the evidence was found
The United States V. Place 462 US Case Brief
510 Words | 3 PagesUnited States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983) Capsule Summary: Seizing a person’s luggage for an extended period until a warrant is obtained violates the Fourth Amendment as beyond the limits of a Terry stop, but, a sniff by a narcotics dog does not constitute a search for Fourth Amendment purposes. Facts: The respondent Raymond Place was stopped by Federal Agents (DEA) upon his arrival into LaGuardia Airport on a Friday afternoon. The respondent refused to consent to the search of his luggage. His luggage was seized by the agents under suspicion they contained narcotics. The respondent was informed the agents would be obtaining a search warrant from a judge.
Case Study: Gideon V. Wainwright
325 Words | 2 PagesGideon V. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799 (1963) is the case I have chose to brief. According to US courts website “Clarence Earl Gideon was an unlikely hero. He was a man with an eighth-grade education who ran away from home when he was in middle school. He spent much of his early adult life as a drifter, spending time in and out of prisons for nonviolent crimes. ”The Petitioner within the case was Clarence Earl Gideon.
Summary Of Charles Katz V. United States
430 Words | 2 PagesThe plaintiff filed to have the evidence suppressed, but the motion was denied. Prior Proceeding: A motion was filed to the Los Angeles Court of Appeals to have the evidence suppressed, but it was rejected. The Plaintiff felt his 4th Amendment right was violated.
Aguilar Vs Texas Case Analysis
731 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis of issues in the motion to suppress. Argument a) The police relied on the information provided by CRI-2 to form the ground for an affidavit seeking to obtain a search warrant. The information from CRI-2 was not credible and could not be independently be relied upon or verified.
Aaron Hernandez And The Inquisitorial System
1046 Words | 5 PagesThis led to circumstantial evidence being admitted and being the basis for
Fre 403 Vs Fre-404 Essay
1185 Words | 5 PagesFRE 403 and FRE 404(b) interact in a variety of degrees usually battling the other, in a courtroom regarding admissible evidence and on what grounds the argument may be made for or against using FRE 403 and FRE 404(b). These rules are vital inside a courtroom and the interaction between these different rules, is crucial to those presenting their case. According to our textbook, Evidence for Paralegals, in chapter 2 page 22, we learn a little history behind these rules as it pertained to evidence and the courts. Long before the Federal Rules of Evidence existed, the courts would come to conclusions about evidence by their relevancy legally. This meant that any evidence introduced would be decided that although it may be of sound logic to enter
Exclusionary Rule In The Weeks V. United States Case
475 Words | 2 PagesEven with the absence of a defendant local police and US federal agent entered Week residence without a warrant and seized evidence related to “illegal gambling which they wished to use against Weeks in a criminal gambling crime” (Ingram p.81). Before his trial, “Weeks requested the return of documents that the federal government sought to use against him, however his request was denied and he was eventually partly convicted based on evidence illegally taken from his residence” (Ingram p. 81). However, during his appeal before the United States Supreme Court Weeks argue that his Fourth Amendment rights was violated when federal agents seized the documents that was used as evidence against him in the trial court and the Court agreed and reversed Weeks
841 Conspiracy Statement
1022 Words | 5 PagesAdditionally, the People allege that defendants’ knowingly, intentionally,
Randy Weaver Primary Sources
1080 Words | 5 PagesThese shortcomings included initial inadequacies in utilizing negotiating personnel, communicating with FBI Headquarters, documenting decisions and securing the site. During and after the crisis, the crime scenes were searched by many law enforcement officials under the direct supervision of the FBI. They found the FBI's handling of the crime scene searches to be inadequate including its failure to use basic crime scene techniques in collecting evidence. Furthermore, the general disorganization and inexperience of some of the participants coupled with inaccuracies in the searches adversely affected the prosecution and contributed to the negative impression of the government generated during the trial. We found no evidence that these deficiencies were intentional or that the FBI staged evidence for the prosecution's benefit.”
Brady V. Maryland Argumentative Essay
390 Words | 2 PagesIn the 1963 ruling in Brady v. Maryland, the United States Supreme Court ruled that any government state or federal has the duty to disclose to a defendant and his counsel any exculpatory information or evidence in its possession. If the
James Richardson's Innocence
927 Words | 4 PagesThis shows that evidence is an important role in pleading someone guilty. When you convict someone of a crime, make sure you know the evidence and information on the case before sentencing
Julius Wolf Case Brief Summary
369 Words | 2 PagesFacts A lady had an abortion performed through back alley means, and had medical complications that resulted in her being in the hospital and questioned by police. She gave them the name of the petitioner, Julius Wolf. The police then followed up on the lead and entered his office without a search warrant and seized items as evidence, one of which was a list of patients. The police then used that evidence to gather more testimony against Wolf.
Truman Trial Decision Essay
909 Words | 4 PagesDuring this trial, President Truman’s innocence was formally debated based on the information presented from the prosecution and defense, and we, the judges, have reached a verdict. We find President Harry S
What Is The Rhetorical Appeal Of In Cold Blood
264 Words | 2 PagesHe argues an unfair trial by referring to the M’Naghten rule in which “Kansas law allowed nothing more than a yes or no
The United States V. Frank Abagnale Case Brief
538 Words | 3 PagesHis trial was not a very long because they had been chasing him for years and tracking his activities. So, the FBI already had their evidence against Abagnale. The plaintiff in this court proceeding was none other than than the United States itself because he had committed federal crimes. The defendant was Frank Abagnale Jr. The decision was quite clear.
More about United States V. Lawson Case Study
The United States V. Place 462 US Case Brief
510 Words | 3 PagesCase Study: Gideon V. Wainwright
325 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of Charles Katz V. United States
430 Words | 2 PagesAguilar Vs Texas Case Analysis
731 Words | 3 PagesAaron Hernandez And The Inquisitorial System
1046 Words | 5 PagesFre 403 Vs Fre-404 Essay
1185 Words | 5 PagesExclusionary Rule In The Weeks V. United States Case
475 Words | 2 Pages841 Conspiracy Statement
1022 Words | 5 PagesRandy Weaver Primary Sources
1080 Words | 5 PagesBrady V. Maryland Argumentative Essay
390 Words | 2 PagesJames Richardson's Innocence
927 Words | 4 PagesJulius Wolf Case Brief Summary
369 Words | 2 PagesTruman Trial Decision Essay
909 Words | 4 PagesWhat Is The Rhetorical Appeal Of In Cold Blood
264 Words | 2 PagesThe United States V. Frank Abagnale Case Brief
538 Words | 3 Pages