The Unity Party is a small multiculturalist party in Australia, formed in 1998 and with the aim of opposing the rise of the controversial anti-immigration politician Pauline Hanson. It was initiated by Doctor Peter Wong who was born in October 1942 in Guangdong Province. When he was 7 years old, he transferred to Indonesia with his father and later went to the University of Sydney to study pharmacology. After graduation, he worked as a doctor in Australia and was awarded as one of the top 10 doctors throughout the country. Successful as he is, Peter Wong believed it is of greater significance to take an active part in politics in order to speak for the ethnic minorities and protect their interests. So he withdrew from the Liberal Party and …show more content…
4.1.1 Against Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party
The year 1998 was tagged with turmoil in Australia because at that time Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party exerted intensive influence on Australian politics with its populist and conservative ideology. The One Nation Part was formed in 1997 by Pauline Hanson, David Oldfield and David Ettridge. The name “One Nation” was chosen to signify belief in national unity, in contrast to a perceived increasing division in Australian society allegedly caused by government policies favoring immigrants and indigenous at the expense of the white Australian majority. In May, 1998, the One Nation Party won 11 seats in Queensland’s state election with over 20% of the approval rate (Tian 55). As the approval rate kept riding high, Pauline Hanson even began to influence the federal parliament. Meanwhile, Australia’s major federal political parties have been, to some extent, influenced by the Hanson phenomenon. There have been substantial defections from major political parties and One Nation is influencing the political agenda for these parties. While there have been instances where major political parties have taken a stand against One Nation, other sections of these parties appear to have given in to political expediency, which is a major concern for the Unity Party. For instance, in an attempt to win back disenchanted voters, the Federal Liberal-National Coalition Government has violated the 1996 pre-election promise not to cut immigration and delayed and downsized the $10 million anti-racism campaign promised by the Coalition before the 1996 election. Similarly, the Labor Party has also been influenced by the rise of Hansonism. Labor has demonstrated an ambivalence towards Howard’s immigration cuts. It has not guaranteed that these
This essay will look at the aspects or reasons as to how and why the coalition government has won the federal election that took place on the 7th of September 2013. There are many reasons why Tony Abbott has won victory against the Rudd and Gillard government and to gain hundreds of thousands of Australian citizen’s trust. Reasons include; Tony Abbott putting a stop to the boats entering the Australian land, the abolishment of carbon tax and the reduction of the cost of living, Abbott promising to recognize Aborigines as nations first people, and lastly Tony Abbott took advantage the distrust that has been happening between the Rudd and Gillard Government to his power by pin pointing their flaws and issues thus making the citizens of Australia think twice on whether they should really put their complete trust in an unstable government to run the country given the economic difficulties happening today around the world. This essay will ideally discuss in depth as to why the coalition won the 2013 federal election and factors that has persuaded the citizens of Australia to vote for the Abbott government.
The Australian Political Policy changed in 1975, mainly due to the Vietnam War. After the war between North and South Vietnam, thousands of Vietnamese immigrants migrated to Australia bearing their own political views. The original policy, impacted a larger, broader reach of Australian Society, especially the selected migrants living in Australian capital cities. Prior to the Vietnam War, Vietnam was a democratic nation. After the change of political leadership, there was a dramatic change in critical leaders that were in power previously (source 1).The change in leadership turned Vietnam into an intense war zone.
This foundation determined the themes that underpin political, social and economic policies Australia’s experience of whiteness historically comes from colonisation, Federation and White Australia policy. Hage argues that White Australia policy was has not been fully abolished and never became obsolete I argue that whiteness was created and built as a foundation for Australia as a successful nation, by the inclusion of White Australia Policy in the nation’s Constitution of 101, and it solidly and securely exited until the mid 1970s. multiculturalism in europe and australia PM Curtin corroborates with Arthur Calwell’s theory of populate or perish to introduce the mass migration Corroborates with Pauline Hanson in her Maiden Speech exemplifying
The success of Hunter Tootoo in winning his riding can ultimately be condensed to the efforts of the Liberal party. Tootoo had previously run in the 1997 federal election, however, as an NDP candidate (Zerehi, 2015). Moreover, he was the only unilingual candidate running in a bilingual riding where the inability to speak Inuktitut should have alienated him from Indigenous voters (Ibid). Tootoo's scattered political history and inability to communicate with a significant portion of his constituents put him at a disadvantage. It can only be concluded that voters were making their decisions based on political party association.
In 1901 the six British colonies of Australia came together to form the Commonwealth of Australia. This federation was the result of intercolonial discussion, referendums and political debate with a range of different issues . However given the country’s history surrounding Asia and Pacific workers and the conflicts due to their presence, it was agreed that the new nation of Australia would be ‘white’ only. Despite Indigenous Australians and Chinese who were already in residence, colonialists aspired to keep the heritage and culture of Australia British and as a result there would be no home for non-European in Australia . After Australia was federated on January 1st 1901 the government passed the Immigration Restriction Bill which became known
Formed in 1957, the Federal Council for the Advancement of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders commenced their campaign with a series of petitions displayed in Source 4 that called for a referendum. This had the effect of not only mobilising support for a change to the constitution but also of informing the public of the issues facing Aborigines. Over the course of the campaign, more than 100,000 signatures were collected and presented to the Parliament in 94 separate petitions (NMA, n.d.). This was a key factor in changing politicians’ minds and the government’s stance (Koori Mail, 2007). A key factor of the support of the referendum by non-indigenous Australians was the Federal Council for the Advancement of Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders ‘Yes’ campaign.
While there were divisions in Australia along class and religious lines, as well as competing visions for the future of the young nation, at first Australians were overwhelmingly united in response to the war. Politically, normally divided political parties united in the face of the crisis. Then Liberal Prime Minister Joseph Cook publically committed 20,000 troops and funds to the cause, opposition leader Andrew Fisher declared that Australia would defend the Empire “to the last man and the last shilling”, and, in December 1914, the War Precautions Act pass through parliament with “little overt dissent”, according to Joan Beaumont. But it was not only within the political arena that support for the war effort was strong. With few exceptions, newspapers across the country reported a growth in patriotic sentiment, with individuals wearing emblems of England and France and the national anthem being played at nightly cultural events.
Speeches made within the past are still relevant to today’s society as the issues they have faced are significant to the values of the present. The statement: "Any significant and valued speech is able to transcend its immediate context", is exemplified within Paul Keating 's Redfern Address (1992) and Noel Pearson 's An Australian History for Us All (1996). Within these speeches, the themes of taking responsibility for actions and the importance of reconciliation resonate as they have influenced change in present-day Australia through new laws and forming the basis of Australian society. Conducted in a predominantly Aboriginal community, the former Prime Minister of Australia, Paul Keating addresses a controversial topic in celebration of
The Republican party actually began as a series of anti-slavery political meetings held in the Midwest in 1854. They are often referred to as the GOP (Grand Old Party). Their rivals are known as the democrats. They stand for traditional views. Most Republicans don't follow the crowd, they stand on the principles that made and founded this country.
An Australian Republic is about us — not the Queen, not Prince Charles or the world economy. We should do it now, without delay. As Nelson Mandela once said, “ For to be free is not merely to cast off one 's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.” Until we break our last Constitutional links to the mother country, our nationhood is incomplete. Now after just over 115 years of Federation, Australia must finally join the world of nations as a full equal, unshackled to any other nation.
Since colonisation in 1788 Europeans believed the Aboriginal peoples to be a primitive race with no societal structures in place because their system did not resemble one that was recognizable or fit within it did not resemble a system that was recognizable by white settlers. National identity is believed to be a general concept that referred to a broad set of codes with a shared understanding within a nation, and the sense of belonging that is reinforced through myths, symbols, media activities, and everyday practices (Carter, 2006, p. 7; Van Krieken et al., 2017, pp. 234-244). Australia is now regarded as a diverse country with an identity that has evolved over time and will continue to do so. For Indigenous Australians to conform to this national identity, they had to assimilate and give up their values, beliefs, and cultural rights to become more like white Australia.
Commencing in the terminating stages of 1941 was the Pacific war. A war which can now be considered not solely a pivotal moment for many nations in the world but also one of high significance for Australia too. Due to the traumatic occurrences throughout the Pacific War Australia was ultimately transformed into a nation which possessed equally more strength and confidence all of which blossomed from victories as well as new allies. However, the Pacific War also birthed and manifested a more immature and racist nation.
In Ben Robert-Smith’s opinion piece published in the Herald Sun on the 16th of January, 2017 “We Are One but We Are Many”, Robert- Smith addresses he Addresses the Australian public with the argument that is changing the date of Australia day from January 26th. He argues that the date should remain the same but should be undertaken in a manner that is “inclusive and respectful” of other Australian’s interpretation of the day. Comparatively, in Kevin V. Russell’s Letter to the Editor he presents the argument from an alternate perspective.
Australia’s experiences of World War II were significant for Australia and impacted on the shaping of our national identity. Australia 's response to entry into World War II in 1939 differed from Australia 's entry into World War I in 1914. Reasons for this includes attitudes towards war changing after gaining the knowledge and experiencing consequences of World War I, the conditions and lead up to World War II as well as Australia’s strong support for Britain. Firstly, the attitude of Australians changed due to World War 3I proving that war was not glamourous or exciting like it was assumed. During the lead up to World War II Australians had already struggled to survive through the depression and were now required to survive at war.
"Reconciliation will not work if it puts a higher value on symbolic gestures rather than the practical needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in areas like health, housing, education and employment." Warren Mundine AO Reconciliation is the action of making one view or belief compatible with another according to the Oxford dictionary of English. The term reconciliation was used as a symbolic gesture in an address made on February 13th 2008 by the former Prime Minister of Australia, Kevin Rudd. Kevin Rudd was the first political figure to speak out and seek reconciliation for the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders after being elected as prime minster in 2007. He spoke out after many generations of mistreated Indigenous Australians that had their rights and equality continuously ignored, but after all that has happened, including the effect of broken families, which still in 2018 have the aftermath of "The stolen generation", there was only one public apology and no compensation for the damages caused to the native people of this country.