The decision towards deciding the best application and form of health care can be assessed through a spectrum that goes from one to five with two significant extremes. At one end of the spectrum under number one, health care is controlled and applied completely through the government. Such a form of healthcare most likely falls under a single payer national healthcare service, which is a form of healthcare that is financed entirely by a single entity; e.g the government. On the other end of the spectrum at number five, healthcare has no government intervention whatsoever. This form of healthcare is categorized as free market healthcare and is a form of health care wherein prices for goods and services are set freely by agreement between patients …show more content…
Evidently, Universal health care does cause an increase in taxes. Politicususa.com, reports that if the U.S were to use Universal Health care there would be a predicted tax hike of at least 20 percent. However, having coverage over the entirety of the population and an increased tax burden is better than having a relatively small minority having access to medical care. Additionally, having public institutions that provide medical services may mean that someone will have to wait for weeks or months in order to see a doctor. However, this does not mean that the quality of Universal health care happens to be worse than a free market system or totally government controlled system. The United kingdom, which employs a form of Universal Health Care through a compulsory but government-subsidized public insurance plan ranks among the top twenty countries in the world in terms of quality of health care; whereas the U.S ranks at number 36 even though it is a developed nation. Overall, tax hikes and the time allotted to wait for medical treatment is far outweighed by the fact that more people have access to care and this is important as it takes into account the needs of the …show more content…
Universal health care is at it’s most fundamental level economical, due to the amount of money it could save for the U.S. Additionally, it has the most compassion for society through its solutions to inequalities in wealth within the context of health protection and helping those with preexisting conditions. Although, Universal health may have disadvantages within the country 's tax system these are offset by the advantages that it provides to coverage and quality of medical management. Overall, during the past two weeks, my viewpoints have changed but not drastically. Before starting our research into insurance and health care I had a firm stance towards total government controlled healthcare primarily because of my parents talking about how the current insurance system we have has been a total scam. Additionally, I had also been disincentivized from thinking that a free market system was at all any good because I had thought that leaving control to private institutions to regulate the costs of goods and services would be horrible for those that could not afford it. However now knowing the freedoms that a government controlled system takes away, in terms of our ability to choose what we pay for as well as having taxes that
The nature of the current debate surrounding the implementation of universal healthcare in America is troubling because it is comprised almost entirely of pragmatic arguments void of concern for the principles behind the project. Before one asks how much a thing will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, one should ask whether enacting universal healthcare is in keeping with the values and principles of the American experiment. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.
Each year, Canada spends over $300 billion on Canadian Medicare, our taxes cover 70 % of essential medical services and private insurance covers the other 30% considered the private sector (Norris, 2020). Dentistry and vision coverage, massage therapy, prescription drugs and ambulance trips are the services not covered by the public health care system (Health Canada, 2023). Therefore, private health care is available to a limited extent, the problem that exists is that, for Canadians, the billing and paying out-of-pocket for medical services covered by Medicare is prohibited. Various countries such as Germany, the Netherlands, and Australia employ a two-tiered system and preform very well, “[i]n comparison… Canada ha[s] the highest proportion of patients with long wait times for specialist appointments and elective surgery” (Moir et al., 2020, para.10). Similarly to Canada, in Australia, public insurance that is tax funded provides residents with free universal health care.
A Call for a Single Payer Universal Health Care System As the 2016 Presidential Elections draw near, the topic of much debate is that of healthcare. Some candidates vow for universal healthcare and mandate health insurance for all, while others believe that tax credits and health savings accounts will resolve the current crisis. Consequently, the nation has been divided on which plan to support and move forward with. Some fear universal health care will diminish the quality of care and lead to long waits, while others fear that health savings accounts and tax credits won’t be enough to insure all and will do little to diminish the administrative costs of the current system. Ultimately because healthcare is a basic right that should be guaranteed
Accessibilities to these kinds of services increase the overall health of the general population. With healthier people means longer life expectancies and an overall boost of the economy. It is well proven in medical studies that in a universal health care system, the standard of living of each individual is increased. Studies show that people living healthier lives allows for them to maximize their contribution to society. It is also known that Canadian citizens have the longest life expectancies in the world, higher than the United States of America by three percent.
The first editorial is in favor of the universal healthcare system. The author supports the claim with statistical reasoning when presenting the argument. The editorial focuses more on facts, logic, and reasoning rather than emotions and opinions.
The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.
Single Payer health care is also much cheaper overall than the currently implemented or any previously implemented system in the United States. The inefficiencies and deprivation of human due to for-profit health care systems must come to an end, and a single payer system must be signed into law because many people have had and will have their lives abused and ruined by the current
Comparison of the United States Health Care System with Other International Health Care Systems Introduction Health care delivery systems continue to be a topic that is debated among political arenas and private sectors. Most countries medical care is managed through their government and require their citizens to join the insurance delivery system (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2016). The other option is privately paying for and receiving medical care (Bodenheimer & Grunbach, 2016).We will explore healthcare systems in four international nations: Germany, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan. These nations have adopted universal health care which provides guaranteed financial access to medical services for all citizens.
How “healthy” is American healthcare? Healthcare is one of the most important topics in the United States, because its spending on healthcare per capita is the highest in the world, but outcomes are not necessarily as good. Americans have been complaining about cost of care, and believe that given current regulations which grant companies long period of exclusivity only help increasing drug and equipment prices. Healthcare stays as one of the most important debate topics in the United States and each presidential candidate always addresses this issue. Obama and his administration implemented a new system, which was supposed to make healthcare more affordable and increase coverage, but there are critics who believe that it didn’t serve its purpose and needs to be repealed (Park 14).
Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.
It is very simple. Taxes will increase more than what they already are just so all individuals can have health care (Emanuel & Fuchs, 2005 and Healy, 2009). Best Objection: The major objection to this is also the primary point which is costs.
Free healthcare for everyone I believe everyone deserves to be given free healthcare if they can not afford it. Plenty of people are dying because we don’t have coverage for everyone. More people are needing universal healthcare and we should be able to give it to those in need. This is making us look so bad to other countries.
Universal health care is a valuable service and should be available in all countries. In many countries millions of people suffer from not having access to healthcare they deserve or not being able to pay for the healthcare they need. In the states alone, an estimated 50 million people do not have insurance because of the inability to pay for it. Universal health care would be beneficial to all countries because it would not exclude anyone from getting the necessary help, it would prevent the insurance companies from denying care, and it would contribute to preventative care to take place.
Having accessibility to any form of healthcare is important to everyone in the world. Despite the fact that it is available to most countries, it does not mean that it is available to everyone. Being able to possess healthcare is seen as a gift in some parts of the world. In some countries, healthcare is free and accessible for all inhabitants, while in other countries one would have to pay for their own health insurance. Specifically, when focusing on Italy and America, there are major differences regarding their healthcare systems.
As Bernie Sanders once said, “Health care must be recognized as a right, not a privilege.” Most developed countries choose to live by this quote while the United States of America chooses to go against it. Universal health care has benefits on multiple levels, whether it’s a single individual or the people in a whole. The U.S is one of the few developed countries that doesn’t offer universal health care to their people, yet the U.S spends more than seventeen percent of their GDP on health insurance. Many people believe that universal health care is a simple one solution problem, but the truth is that there are multiple forms of universal health care that provide all citizens with the health insurance they need.