Kade Styron Professor Mosley English 1101 21 February 2023 Universal Healthcare: Is it For America? Universal health care in America may sound like a dream, but it would be a flawed system. Universal Health Care is a system in which everyone has equal access to free healthcare without discrimination. Currently, America has a mixed system of health care. In general, healthcare is from private insurance companies, however, we also give government healthcare to people in need through systems like Medicare. America’s current mixed system is a better fit for the United States because of its greater efficiency and lower cost. A mixed system of healthcare is more beneficial for America than a Universal Healthcare system would be due to its substantial …show more content…
Every business, including hospitals, is primarily focused on making money. This desire for income drives private hospitals to increase their efficiency and constantly improve their system. If a Universal system of healthcare was implemented in America, there would only be government-owned hospitals that lack the incentive to be as efficient as possible. We can look at the wait time of countries close to America like Canada where “Specialist physicians surveyed report a median waiting time of 27.4 weeks between referral from a general practitioner and receipt of treatment” (Barua and Moir 1). According to Phillip Miller, the vice president of communications for AMN healthcare, in America, where a mixed system is currently used, it “takes an average of 26.0 days to schedule a new patient physician appointment in 15 of the largest cities in the United States” (Miller 2). This shows a difference between the healthcare wait times in America and in a country with a Universal healthcare system. Another fact to note is that this wait is not due to the number of available physicians. The website Health System Tracker shows that the United States has fewer physicians per capita than other comparable countries that have universal healthcare such …show more content…
“Universal Health Coverage is achieved when everybody receives the healthcare, they need without suffering financial hardship” (The Elders 1). This means that theoretically anyone could receive quality treatment without discrimination of income. However, economists estimate that 85% of tax-paying Medicaid recipients and 66% of tax-paying Medicare recipients would pay more if a Universal Healthcare system was implemented (Baldacci and Moffit 24). This demonstrates how Universal health care would actually hurt the impoverished as they are the ones under government assistance already. A mixed Health Care system is a great compromise that benefits those in need without an atrocious cost. Switching to a Universal health care system is bound to have many costs that come with it. The only real Universal health care plan was made by Bernie Sanders during his 2016 presidential campaign. However, his plan seems unfinished as there is very little talk about how it is going to get paid for. Sander’s office gave a few suggestions including a 4% income tax, a 7.5% tax on employers, and more. However, all of this wouldn’t be enough to cover estimates made by many economists. “The proposal would require combined payroll and income taxes of 20 percent... a vast majority of working Americans would pay more for health care than they do today” (Baldacci and Moffit 23).
In America, universal healthcare would undermine principles important to the functioning of society; specifically, it would undermine individual liberty, free enterprise and free
Health care for everyone is able to give people time out of the financial debt if they have no insurance. When you have no insurance you have to pay out of pocket for all doctor visits and also you might be rejected medical help. So when there is everyone on one page with health care you are able to have your finances in tack a little more also if it becomes more inexpensive for the people. Don 't you think that your body is worth the try?The government makes millions dollars of the medical industry weather prescription drugs,insurance companies,and doctor visits. When everyone is the same that means the government would have to set one set prices for everyone to be able to survive financially in it and not everyone is able to go into
It is a topic that is highly politicized and slammed as a far-left, unattainable socialist ideal. Many people say that Universal Healthcare is too big of an undertaking for the government and that it would cost too much money. This is partially true, in a report by the Pew Research Center looking at public trust in the federal government, their data shows that public trust among U.S. adults has been on the decline for nearly two decades. But, if you look closer into their findings, you will realize that the distrust stems from the government’s inaction. Many people feel like the government is not doing enough on issues that matter.
Why deny people care for their health? Overall the universal healthcare system would benefit the citizens of the United
The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.
In the US, an average person spends about $11,582 on healthcare. Healthcare in the US is too confusing and health insurance doesn’t cover outside of the US. In healthcare, there is a lot of corruption regarding health insurance companies over the years, and healthcare is also expensive for low-income families in the US. Tikkanen and Issitt both have wrote on the topic of healthcare, are both are very educated on the topic of healthcare. Tikkanen and Issitt both reason that healthcare is unfavorable if people look at all the other countries healthcare systems.
Firstly, the cost of financing a universal healthcare system would be enormous. According to a report by the Congressional Budget Office, the implementation of a single-payer system would require an estimated $32 trillion over a ten-year period. This would necessitate an increase in taxes, which may not be favorable to all Americans. Moreover, the implementation of a universal healthcare system would require significant structural changes in the current healthcare system, which could be challenging to
Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.
It will unavoidably cost people so much more than now. At this stage in time, folks pay the health care facilities, but once the universal healthcare goes full force, the government will take over. A good example where they are already doing this is the VA hospitals. Veterans do not get the care that they are supposed to get. If veterans do not get the care that they are meant to get then how will anyone else be able to?
This is causing Americans to not be as healthy as they could be. Bernie Sanders came up with a plan that is very different than what is currently in place. Chris Jacobs who writes for the Wall Street Journal said, “While Mr. Sanders claims that his bill would extend Medicare for all, it would instead create and entirely new program while borrowing the Medicare name” (Jacobs). This is the right thing to do because right now the system needs help, and a big change is the best way to improve it. His plan includes many benefits that would solve the problems of the current plan.
Although there are many current issues plaguing the United States, one that is very solvable is the issue of healthcare, specifically, the unreasonably high cost of healthcare. Other countries around the world with similar economic standing to the US, can maintain a considerably lower price point for decent healthcare. In the US this issue is extremely relevant because many people are one hospital visit away from falling into serious debt. The system of healthcare here is so expensive that many times people will die because of an inability to pay for needed treatment, even if it is an easily treated issue. In the US, someone dying from diabetes because of the high price of insulin is much too common, and making people sacrifice their financial
America has been in a healthcare crisis for a long time and switching to a universal healthcare system instead of a commercial system would allow for a larger portion of the country to have access to healthcare and would provide Americans without health insurance another option. Commercial healthcare systems have proven to be effective yet cataclysmic to working class and low income families. The United States should implement a universal healthcare system that benefits all of its residents and healthcare reform should be on the top priority of the voters and
However, despite the fact that America is one of the most developed countries in the world, it is yet to make the switch to a universal healthcare system. The American government needs to implement a universal healthcare system. The current private healthcare system in America has proven to be
One of the issues health care has cost. The government maybe paying the bills but the government gets the money it needs to keep things in public working well is through taxes. An argument that can be made is that people who work to pay for their health insurance would also be paying for someone else's. Also, Universal health care would cause wait time to see a specialist.
In a non-pandemic instance, the savings could be anywhere around $438 billion per year by moving to a universal healthcare