Using Kotter’s eight steps to analyze the change process
1 Create a sense of urgency
From my perspective, our organization change was a failure case. There are many causes, one of which is that our instructor didn’t create a sense of urgency. As Warner Burke stated “Organizational members must see the need for change for them to be willing to embrace it.” (Burke, 1999) However, we all thought that we accumulated a good reputation through years of effort, so that we could easily get the right to host various campus activities, and the greater chance to receive funds and sponsorship fees. We can’t see the need or urgency to separate student union to two organization when the old system was running well. All in all, we thought there was no real importance or benefit for any member to transfer over so of course no one wanted to move. Developing a sense of urgency around the need of change may help change leader spark initial motivation to get things moving.
2 Build a guiding coalition
…show more content…
This often takes strong leadership and visible support from key people within your organization. Managing change isn't enough – you have to lead it. To lead change, you need to bring together a coalition, or team, of influential people whose power comes from a variety of sources, including job title, status, expertise, and political importance. (Implementing Change Powerfully and Successfully, n.d.) However, our change leader didn’t build a guiding coalition for us. We just hold our own judge based on our campus activity experience, we worried about our status and sponsorship fees would be negatively affected, and we may lose the right to host major campus activities. Unfortunately, we even didn't get the strong persuasion from our
One central theme in Allies, by Alan Gratz, is that working together will help lead to success and accomplish common goals. One reason is that working together will lead to success and also it will lead to friendships and bonds.
The model that will be utilized to implement the change outlined within this paper is the Stetler Model. The model focuses on the nurse as the main critical thinker, but can be utilized by a group of clinicians. The model uses a systematic approach to bring about change through a five step process that involves the following: preparation, validation, comparative evaluation and decision-making, translation/application, and evaluation (Schaffer, Sandau, and Diedrick, 2013). This model focuses on defining the needs priority by way of evidence based research. Evidence is gathered externally via research and internally such as outcome data, consensus data, and experimental information (Schaffer, Sandau, and Diedrick, 2013).
Then, there are other times when we become the thought leader or the force driving that change. We have to look at our circumstances, we have to look at our lives, we have to look at the events surrounding us, and ask ourselves what will be our response? How can I take a proactive approach to this situation? For example, if there is someone seeking a job transition, they’re probably in a career right now doing the same thing they’ve been doing for quite a long time.
Organization is the major key to making anything happen successfully. First off you have to designate a strong leader. You need someone who knows what is going on so that they can successfully lead the movement and make wise choices when it comes to whatever kind of plan you’re going to make. You also need a leader who is fair, willing to listen to everyone’s suggestions, and not willing to give up on the rest of the group. Besides a good leader, one must also make a clear and organized plan.
Force of Change Assessment (FOCA) helps the City of Chicago to identify the challenges that are occurring or will occur that will impact their health and the quality of life of their residents. Besides that, The Force of Change Assessment allows to identify factors that affect and face the Chicago Public Health System and this will help to answer question of what is occurring or what will occur that could influence the residents of Chicago City. (National Association of County & City Health Officials, 2014). The Force of Change subcommittee group was formed from representatives from City of Chicago Department of Public Health; the health care facilities chosen were Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Rush Hospital.
The purpose of this final project What Kind of Change Leadership Will You Provide? Integrated Principles and Theories of Organizational Change Understanding institutional culture
Chris Hadfield once said that “Ultimately, leadership is not about glorious crowning acts... It is about laying the groundwork for others' success, and then standing back and letting them shine.” Hadfield is stating in this quote that in order our leaders to be successful, they muse ensure our prosperity before their own. With this quote clearly effective leaders collaborate with their people to ensure they are successful and mindful. Collaborative leadership is the strongest way to lead because fear and power can sometimes create anarchy and dissent while respect and decency ultimately create a harmonious society.
Change hosts of multitude of amazing opportunities–an opportunity to learn and grow, an opportunity for new beginnings and finally an opportunity way to improve life. Change should be looked upon as an opportunity instead of a threat. I was one of those many individuals that created a barrier from change and chose to hide. My outlook on change was entirely altered upon my transfer to a new school. Change made me a better and happier human being.
As with any type of group work, disagreements are likely to surface; but that’s why I have experience managing large groups of people and dealing with problems and complicated ideas. If needed be, I will step up and make myself useful, whether it is in a classroom setting, a lab, or the workplace. I am also determined to work side-by-side with people who have the same fascination with academics and who want to see the same change in the world as I do; but first, I have to start by graduating from
Abstract The strategic change cycle is one of the processes within strategic planning. This cycle is a ten-step process created to assist organizations in meeting their mandates, satisfying their missions, and constructing public value. “Strategic planning is intended to enhance an organization’s ability to think, act, and learn strategically” (Bryson & Alston, 2011). Introduction Strategic planning is “a deliberate, disciplined effort to produce fundamental decisions and actions that shape and guide what an organization (or other Entity) is, what it does, and why it does it” (Bryson & Alston, 2011).
Hence, leaders need to be prepared and manage readiness to the alteration by making an environment of honesty and transparency for their team as a successful implementation of the change is unlikely. Employees must be part of the change hence, they must to be told about the requirement of the change and be given a reward to motivate to embrace the change. If change be accepted by all recipients it can be implemented quickly and effectively. The leaders’ attitudes and behaviors have both positive and negative alterations on the change success. Therefore, leaders of organizations need to try and develop a more framing and shaping behavior, adding skills on themselves to change and motivate the subordinates towards the embracing the change.
Application of John Kotter’s theory on Borders In the 1990’s, Borders was a top bookselling company that was dominating the market with its competitor, together holding more than 40% of the market share. However, the company soon embarked on an unbelievable series of missteps that led to its collapse. In this paper, the different factors that caused Borders to liquidate 511 stores in the US before going out of business will be discussed. Then, solutions that could have been implemented to prevent this catastrophe will be proposed.
The post office was experiencing serious economic turmoil and overall poor performance and as a result, the change generators ventured into a process of change management. Change management according to Lewin's Change Management Model states “Change Management is a broad discipline that involves ensuring change is implemented smoothly and with lasting benefits, by considering its wider impact on the organization and people within it. Each change initiative you manage, or encounter will have its own unique set of objectives and activities, all of which must be coordinated.” This model is divided into three (03) phases unfreezing, changing, and freezing. In the case these phases were adapted as Generating change, Implementation and Adoption.
My experience in Change Management is very limited. The theoretical knowledge I have acquired during the first four weeks of this module has made me realize that transforming organizations is a difficult and complex task. I have read case studies mentioning the unique contribution of change leaders whose role is to talk to people’s hearts and minds. I have also understood how important is to reconcile conflicting interests and emergent tensions between top-down transformation initiatives and functional operations. Despite the widespread belief that managing change is tough, there is little agreement regarding the factors which influence change the most.
Working together, you can develop solutions based on your collective insight, wisdom and creativity. Practicing a deeper level of awareness and taking responsibility for your words and