ipl-logo

Utilitarian And Kantian Argument Analysis

217 Words1 Page

Utilitarian’s argue that social productivity is raised when jobs are awarded on the basis of merit. They feel that race, sex, and religion are unrelated to job performance, and as such have nothing to do with merit. The allocation of jobs on the basis of race, sex, and religion is inefficient, and under Utilitarian principles, is morally wrong.

On the other hand, the Kantian argument views discrimination as wrong because it treats people as a means to an end to the social obligation that the discrimination serves. These can be racist and sexist discrimination or reverse discrimination found in affirmative action. Kantians would also argue that discrimination is a not a comprehensive practice, and that those who discriminate would not want

Show More
Related

  • Jeff Yang Quotes

    536 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Jeff Yang’s concept of discrimination shows that it is distinctly ambiguous. Yang’s article “Harvard Lawsuit Is Not What It Seems” it shows the viewpoint of the story from his perspective along with the opposing side. There are both negative and positive sides to this lawsuit. A piece of literature that reflects on this concept is “I Have a Dream” by Martin Luther King Jr.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between 1984 And Anthem

    761 Words  | 4 Pages

    One’s jobs are chosen, their schedule is chosen, and it is an absolute moral sin to expect otherwise. Even while committing these “sins of preference”, Equality doesn’t stop talking about how he is doing something that he sees as morally wrong. “We knew this well, in the years of our childhood, but our curse

    Read More

  • Immigration Sounds Nice, But Who Deserves The Most Merit By John Carson On Merit

    429 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the editorial Merit Based Immigration Sounds Nice, But Who Deserves the Most Merit, John Carson asserts that the concept of merit based immigration, while justified, has several areas that need clearer guidelines. The author begins by giving unbiased background information on the issue, and why this merit is an arbitrary subject. Moving forward, Carson illustrates how from the founding of the nation, “merit [has been used] to justify inequality,” (Carson). In his passage the author, continuously displays the ways merit can be used in favor of certain groups, and how those in power later choose to extend human rights to. John Carson, believes that since the founding of the nation, “merit is employed as a way of unequal doling out limited resources,” (Carson).

    Read More

  • Fobs Vs Twinkies Analysis

    659 Words  | 3 Pages

    Discrimination Between Races “Prejudice is a chain, it can hold you. If you prejudice, you can't move, you keep prejudice for years. Never get nowhere with that. ”- Bob Marley.

    Read More

  • White Privilege In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    Every day over 352,000 babies are born. The second these babies enter the world, the opportunities and privileges given to them vary but are set at their birth. Privilege constantly determines opportunities whether the individual can help it or not, and it is revealed constantly throughout our country's history. In the past privilege has affected minorities lives and their opportunities in careers, freedom of speech, and much more. Unconscious biases and privileges are still very well present today but not as obvious.

    Read More

  • The Detroit Riots

    1403 Words  | 6 Pages

    Ultimately, God intended for workers to have rights and safe working environment, however, racism in the workplace counteracts this

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer

    673 Words  | 3 Pages

    A mouse, for example, does have an interest in not being kicked along the road, because it will suffer if it is” (Singer 5). Therefore, if a being suffers there is moral rationale for that being to refuse that suffering. This argument supports the articles ultimate conclusion that the granting of rights should be base on morale rather than characteristics, sex, race, species. Singer believes that if these change were to be adopted by societies that discrimination would be severely reduced and perhaps eliminated as a

    Read More

  • What Does My Headscarf Mean To You Analysis

    880 Words  | 4 Pages

    It is exactly that mindset, she argues, that creates so many boundaries and limits for minorities. She believes that unconscious bias, or explicit prejudice, leads to a detrimental lack of diversity in the workforce. (Abdel-Magied, 1:37) The unconscious bias that we all have, she says, is harmful to society because there are people who are just as qualified to be in certain positions, but are sometimes held back merely because of race, religion, disability, class, or

    Read More

  • Shackled Runner Thesis

    1028 Words  | 5 Pages

    It is a very useful article which provides counter arguments to four main criticisms of positive discrimination, which are: 1) Failure to select the “best” candidate; 2) The undermining of meritocracy; 3) The negative impact on the beneficiaries; 4) Injustice of reverse discrimination. This article starts with the analogy of the “shackled runner” given by the US President Lyndon Johnson who introduced affirmative action legislation in 1965 aimed to redress discrimination towards

    Read More

  • Minority Groups In The Workplace

    308 Words  | 2 Pages

    The careers of majority and minority differ because of racial imbalance in all levels of almost all organizations. The most prominent can be seen through the patterns of movement, especially in the management and executive positions where a member of the minority groups finds it very hard to navigate to the top. While the majority have a good leverage and have the potential to rise quickly through the ranks so fast; the minority struggle at the bottom while trying to prove themselves before their efforts are recognized. According to the author, awarding of promotions on racial lines is a challenge faced by minority groups.

    Read More

  • What Is Kant's Categorical Argumentative

    261 Words  | 2 Pages

    To answer the question presented. We first have to know what each of these mean. The Golden Rule reads, Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Paraphrasing, it implies that we must do good. Not only because it benefits us, but the people around us as well.

    Read More

  • The Role Of Discrimination In Modern Society

    1736 Words  | 7 Pages

    Name: Haslinda Bte Ismail (G1318084) Course: EDF 6606 Philosophy in Education for Thinking Date: 11 December 2014 Modern societies tend to consider discrimination on the basis of race, religion, and gender to be morally wrong.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Argumentative Essay

    290 Words  | 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant was a firm disbeliever and the number one opponent of utilitarianism, utilitarianism is when an individual or ‘ utilitarian’ are those who believe the value of something is determined by its usefulness which completely opposes Kant’s theory. Kant believed that certain types of actions performed by individuals for example murder, stealing, lying etc. are Without question by the moral and ethics of the ‘categorical imperative’ forbidden and corrupt even in different cases where the act may bring more happiness or more benefit than harm. For Kantians ( Kant’s theory followers) they must ask themselves two essential questions whenever they decide to proceed with any act according to his moral theory of ‘categorical imperative’ 1.

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Argumentative Essay

    170 Words  | 1 Pages

    Kant's theory of the categorical imperative states that human is the ultimate value and should be regarded as an end. The basic idea for Kant's categorical imperative is to do the right thing because the idea of it being right is the sole reason for doing it. An action is not right or wrong based solely on the reason by which it was performed, but our intent which makes all the difference. Kant only cares about our ethical motivations and actions. Intentionally stating statements as anything but the truth, is lying.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Affirmative Action

    196 Words  | 1 Pages

    One of the most significant current discussions in legal and moral philosophy is affirmative action. Affirmative action is a positive discriminatory action or policy intended to eliminate discrimination based on race, ethnicity, nationality, and gender in workplaces and educational institutions. The dispute behind affirmative action relies on the public’s comprehension of it and because of its ambiguous constitution. A multitude might argue that this policy ensures equality by forcing institutions to accept citizens regardless of for instance disability or that they are minorities. Supposedly, it’s purpose

    Read More

More about Utilitarian And Kantian Argument Analysis

Open Document