ipl-logo

Utilitarianism Vs. Kant On Morality

141 Words1 Page

Unlike Kant’s view on the morality, Utilitarianism suggests very different idea. Contrast to Kant, utilitarianism is result-based ethic that suggests “an ethically right choice in a given situation is the one that produces the most happiness and the least unhappiness for the largest number of people” (Farias, p.12). Base on utilitarianism, if killing or hurting other people can provide greater happiness to large number of people, it is moral action to do so. Yet, according to Kant, it cannot be a moral thing to do since it does not pass the universalizability test. If everyone supports to kill or hurt other people for the greater happiness, then there will be no one left in this earth because everyone will kill each other to gain the most happiness.

Show More
Related

  • Utilitarianism In The Things They Carried By Tim O Brien

    1673 Words  | 7 Pages

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that determines right from wrong when looking at the outcomes. It believes that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number. Consequentialism is found in utilitarianism; consequentialism is largely thought about during war. When you fight for your life in war, you end up taking another person's life. While this may be good for your country, it is hurting a different country.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism And Kantian Ethics

    833 Words  | 4 Pages

    Whether or not to give money to a homeless man depends on one’s values. Especially if you have the money and would hardly notice it’s absence. This paper will argue whether to give money to a homeless person based on the theories of utilitarianism, Kantian ethics and virtue ethics. Utilitarianism promotes maximizing the most happiness or pleasure. Therefore, this view would give the homeless person the money.

    Read More

  • Theory Of Utilitarianism And Drinking Age

    1533 Words  | 7 Pages

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focuses on outcomes and consequences. When one considers the theory of utilitarianism, it must be understood that the pleasure is a fundamental moral good and the aim is to maximize pleasure and minimize pain. So, when a human is going through the decision making process it is of the utmost importance to look forward at the consequences of the decision and determine if the decision will maximize pleasure and minimize pain. John Stuart Mill, a nineteenth century philosopher focused on the theory of utilitarianism or the Greatest Happiness Principle and claimed that the maximization of happiness for the greatest quantity of people is the ultimate goal. One issue that we face in modern day America that

    Read More

  • Deontology Vs Utilitarianism

    1515 Words  | 7 Pages

    The morality of an action is determined by the outcome of that action. At an initial glance, Utilitarianism seems as if it would be a superior way to live a life full of good will, as it is focused on doing the most

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism

    1228 Words  | 5 Pages

    As it has been shown, the utilitarian view has its strengths and is certainly logical in some cases, however, Kantian ethics offer a more stable set of moral

    Read More

  • Essay On Divine Command Theory

    1218 Words  | 5 Pages

    The main principle of utilitarianism is happiness. People who follow this theory strive to fulfill the “ultimate good”. The “ultimate good” is defined as ultimate pleasure with out any pain. It is said that the pleasure can be of any quantity and any quality, but pleasures that are weighted more important are put at a higher level than others that are below it. This ethical theory also states that if society would fully embrace utilitarianism then people would naturally realize their moral standing in the

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism In Computer Science

    1239 Words  | 5 Pages

    The utilitarianism is common approach to make ethical decisions. The main point of this approach is that you have to make that decision which comes with the most utility. The utility in this approach can be described as „The good”, and the opposite of this is „the bad”. This means that in Computer Science you have to produce a computer programme or a hardware, which produces the largest amount of good , and during the producing phase, it makes the least amount of bad, for all who are affected: customers, employees, and even the enviroment. With the utilitarian viewpoint people can make right, and ethical decisions, for instance if you produce a programme which can make life easier for millions of people, you should not sell it for extremly

    Read More

  • Are The Similarities Between Bentham And John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism

    908 Words  | 4 Pages

    As per this theory the outcome of any action should minimize the pain and maximize the pleasure. The utilitarianism have two groups one is the Act utilitarian’s focun on the effects of individual actions (Such as Nathuram Godse’s assassination of Mahatma Gandhi) and another is rule utilitarian’s those focus on the effects of types of actions (such as killing or stealing) Utilitarians believe that the purpose of morality is to make life better by increasing the amount of good things (such as pleasure and happiness) in the world and decreasing the amount of bad things (such as pain and unhappiness). They reject moral codes or systems that consist of commands or taboos that are based on customs, traditions, or orders given by leaders

    Read More

  • Theories Of Utilitarianism, Kantianism, And Aristotelianism

    1163 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout history many great philosophers have attempted to unravel the origins of virtues by developing moral theories of their own. This document is designed to provide the reader with an overview of some of the more popular theories concerning morals. Three of the most popular moral theories are… Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism. Though Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism differ in many ways, they also share similar fundamentals. Utilitarianism is a highly acclaimed theory that is morally based on consequentialism.

    Read More

  • Adolf Eichmann And Kant's Ethical Theory

    740 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Itself states that people should act in a certain way that you always treat humanity and always consider them as an end but never as mere means. This moral theory opposes to Utilitarianism, which supports the “greatest happiness principle”. According to “greatest happiness principle” people ought to act in such a way that produce the greatest amount of happiness for the

    Read More

  • Difference Between Utilitarianism And Kantianism

    866 Words  | 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is different from Kantianism because it says that you can perform any action even if it provides some harm to others, but at the end it should provide maximum utility. But on the other end, Kantianism says that you need to treat everyone equal, no one less than the other. They both hold different views but they both are right in certain situations. Utilitarianism and Kantianism conflict in many situations. For example, you have a friend who’s pregnant, but she’s scared to tell her parents.

    Read More

  • Kant's Ethics Vs. Utilitarian Ethics

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    Hyejin Jang Professor Writing DED 8 April 2016. 4. 7. Kant’s ethics differs from utilitarian ethics both in its scope and in the precision with which it guides action. In The Categorical Imperative, Kant emphasizes that human autonomy is the essence of morality.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Argumentative Essay

    290 Words  | 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant was a firm disbeliever and the number one opponent of utilitarianism, utilitarianism is when an individual or ‘ utilitarian’ are those who believe the value of something is determined by its usefulness which completely opposes Kant’s theory. Kant believed that certain types of actions performed by individuals for example murder, stealing, lying etc. are Without question by the moral and ethics of the ‘categorical imperative’ forbidden and corrupt even in different cases where the act may bring more happiness or more benefit than harm. For Kantians ( Kant’s theory followers) they must ask themselves two essential questions whenever they decide to proceed with any act according to his moral theory of ‘categorical imperative’ 1.

    Read More

  • Kantian Ethics And Moral Reasoning

    1674 Words  | 7 Pages

    When someone is faced with a hard decision, often they will automatically use their personal opinions and moral reasoning to conclude what they want to do. When I personally make ethical decisions, I will take into considering my own feelings and thoughts but also, I would think about how, whatever my decision might be, would affect the people around me. Another aspect I would ponder how it would influence my future. Theories such as Utilitarianism and those of Kant, influence my everyday decisions however only in certain situations. Often Utilitarianism is used while I am working, and I would have to consider the customers feelings and thoughts about our product.

    Read More

  • Utilitarian And Kantian View Of Virtue Ethics

    897 Words  | 4 Pages

    Virtue ethics started drawing attention since the modern ethics exposed its limitation and reconsideration about the priority was needed. Contemporary ethics focus on “What we should do”, instead of “What kind of person we should do”. In consequence, the moral codes in modern era solely emphasizes moral duty and rules, while neglecting personality and character of individuals. Virtue ethics support the traditional criterion that consider moral virtue and personality of individuals as important. The virtue of good engineer includes creativity, good understanding of culture, morality, and capability of communication.

    Read More

More about Utilitarianism Vs. Kant On Morality

Open Document