Essay On Value Of Human Life

Value of a Human Life

The value of a life should not be based on financial, physical, or mental state. In an ideal world, all lives would be equal, however, it is hard to disregard each individual 's life experiences. From birth, all humans should be valued at an equal level, because that is something we don 't have control over. The best way to evaluate life value would be based on how they affect others lives, plus one for bettering another human’s life, minus one for hurting another human. This would be difficult to calculate accurately, but it would be an equal way of deciding a life’s worth. Relying on the idea that the point of life is to exist for others, it seems fitting that lives should be valued by how you affect other humans.

As we have all learned from our history textbooks or dictionaries, racism the idea that one race is superior over another. Valuing a life based on something unchangeable is completely unfair. Value should be based on choices and actions an individual makes. Often times lifelong physical disabilities do not

This follows the idea that if you enhance others life you are more valuable. Shakespeare’s “Hamlet’s Soliloquy” portrays the idea that he values his own life based on the troublesome experiences he’s been through. To value your own life differently than someone else values your life would not fit this scale but is logical. Bad things happening to you is different than making bad decisions, therefore your life value on the scale would be at a certain point. It is also easy to see in Jones’s article that physical disabilities don’t always mean life is less worth living. Unlike Hamlet who is struggling to live through an emotional state, Ebert knows and enjoys what he has left of his life. This just proves that physical state and mental state do not predict how someone does or should value their own