ipl-logo

Value Of Human Life In The Most Dangerous Game By Kenneth Feinberg

436 Words2 Pages

Value of a human life Value of human life can differ because of multiple things. According to some articles some people are worth more than others depending on their occupations. Logically this is correct but morally it is wrong. Although society has morals it does not deally with these tragedies morally. Society should compensate for lost loved ones equally. But instead they base it on income.

One example is that there was an article it was called “What Is The Value Of A Human Life”. It was about the 911 terrorist attacks and a certain man named Kenneth Feinberg had to make a choice on how much compensation each individual received he chose to do it based on their occupation. For example the chef made less money there for less compensation. The banker same rules apply more income more compensation. Imagine being in one of those families and your loved one dies and says ok they're only worth 50,000$ and we can't give you anymore because this other person is worth 100,000$. That would suck."Mr. Feinberg, my husband was a fireman and died a hero at the World Trade Center. Why are you giving me less money than the banker who represented Enron? Why are you demeaning the memory of my husband?" Very mad families. …show more content…

A character called “General Zaroff” got bored with hunting animals because he thought they were unintelligent so he resorted to hunting people and “Zaroff” would base how much their life was worth buy how much they could do. “Rainsford” The unlucky man falls from his yacht and swims to shore only to be haunted by “Zaroff”. This short story also suggests that the value of a human life fluctuates depending in the occupation a person has only this is not about

Show More
Related

  • Sacrifice In 'The Most Dangerous Game'

    62 Words  | 1 Pages

    Foreshadowing and climax are connected because foreshadowing can change thoughts and ideas for the climax and end of the story like in The Most Dangerous Game we are hinted about General Zaroff kills humans to set an idea but it never says "Humans are the best hunting animals" at the beginning. This is why forshadowing and climax are and can be

    Read More

  • 'Roger Ebert: The Essential Man'

    556 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hundreds of thousands of dollars go into representing the value of a human life. The government continuously hands money to civilians who lost a loved one and struggle to maintain a lifestyle. Putting a dollar value on human life is without a doubt inhumane, but valuing life as much as possible is the most important aspect to discovering human value. Reading an interview titled, “Roger Ebert: The Essential Man [Excerpts]” by Chris Jones, I came to an appalling but realistic conclusion that sickness changes the way a person values life. Ebert, in the interview states, “I didn’t always know this, and am happy I lived long enough to find out.”

    Read More

  • Short Essay On The Most Dangerous Game By General Zaroff

    660 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hey there today we are telling a story that is called The Most Dangerous Game. It is a very good story to read and twisted. There are two main character in this story and they both have very interesting stories about their life, but they will fight for victory and one will die and who will it be the good guy Rainsford, or the villain Zaroff. General Zaroff is chasing them through the jungle, He sees something in the cave he shoots his arrow and then…... General Zaroff is a very sick and twisted man who likes to kill people for fun.

    Read More

  • Rainsford's Summary: The Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

    217 Words  | 1 Pages

    Before Rainsford entered the “Dangerous Game,” General Zaroff, the owner of the island, tried to persuade Rainsford to believe that killing humans is not murder. The General was explaining to Rainsford that he had invented a new animal to hunt, a animal that can reason, make hunting last longer and more interesting, humans. Rainsford couldn’t help but to speak; “‘Hunting? Good God, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder’” (Connell 27).

    Read More

  • Most Dangerous Game Compare And Contrast Essay

    653 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sometimes life can be a dangerous game, and in this story one man gets caught in the most dangerous game of all. This short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, is about Rainsford, a great hunter, who gets lost and finds himself in a tricky situation with another great hunter named General Zaroff. These hunters share the same interests and viewpoint when it comes to the animals they hunt, except when Rainsford realizes that Zaroff may be hunting a different kind of prey. Although these two characters feel the same way about animals not having feelings, Rainsford changes his mind when he realizes what being hunted really feels like. Both Rainsford and General Zaroff are unsympathetic towards their prey.

    Read More

  • What Is Life Worth Amanda Ripley Analysis

    457 Words  | 2 Pages

    "What is the value of life?” When you are asked this question most people will start to think about their accomplishments, their families, what they have done, and sometimes people simply do not know how to answer this question. In the article “What is Life Worth?” by Amanda Ripley, it talks more about putting a value of money on a life.

    Read More

  • Overcoming Adversity In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game

    354 Words  | 2 Pages

    Everyone has to overcome adversity in their life. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” the main character, Rainsford, fell of his boat at night time On the Island, Rainsford finds a home where General Zaroff lives. The problem is that the only way he can leave the island is if he survives a “game”. Where General Zaroff is hunting him. So Rainsford has to survive for three days.

    Read More

  • Essay On Most Dangerous Game And Rainsford's Dilemma

    687 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are several conflicts in “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell; while person versus person is the most obvious, person versus self and person versus nature are also present. For example, the “jagged crags” upon which Rainsford lands scratch his hands until they are raw, and when Rainsford is trying to survive the hunt, nature once again acts as an obstacle. The muck is like “ a giant leech” and the insects “[bite] him savagely” through the dense vegetation. On the other hand, Rainsford faces an internal dilemma when he is talking to Zaroff about hunting humans for sport: while Rainsford is shocked by the proposition, he feels no revulsion, no disgust. Therefore, because Rainsford does not seem to have an internal aversion to Zaroff’s proposal, that causes a quandary - his lack of moral dilemma in this situation is a dilemma in itself.

    Read More

  • The Most Dangerous Game Literary Analysis Essay

    564 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The Most Dangerous Game” Essay In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell A man named Rainsford hears a gunshot and falls off a boat on to which he was traveling upon. Rainsford swims to this island to which he heard the gunshots, once on land he walks around and finds an unusual sight A mansion. When inside the mansion he comes across a man Named General Zaroff whos is a fan of his. Zaroff he hunts humans.

    Read More

  • Short Essay On The Most Dangerous Game

    840 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The Most Dangerous Game,” a short story by Richard Connell, dives into the discussion over whether animals have feelings, and if it is fine for them to be hunted for a human’s own entertainment. The main protagonist, Sanger Rainsford, an American author and hunter, and the antagonist, General Zaroff, a hunter as-well, have similar views in the concept of dominance and killing animals for their own pleasure. Throughout the events of the story, both characters, ironically, switch between being the ‘hunter’ and ‘huntee’ through the development of the story, and it explores the different strategies, thoughts, and feelings they experience in their situations. The theme of “The Most Dangerous Game” concentrates on the human tendency for superiority and power under any circumstance, no matter how inhumane. The theme is demonstrated through the beliefs and actions of the characters, along with the conception of the game.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Most Dangerous Game Conflict

    621 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Most Dangerous Game Conflicts All stories have to have a conflict, the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell has three important conflicts. Man against man, man against nature, man against himself are the three main conflicts that take place. For man against man Rainsford and General Zaroff are fighting each other in the hunting ‘game’. For man against nature Rainsford is fighting the sea once he hears the gunshots and is trying to get out of the water.

    Read More

  • Values 'Change In The Short Story The Most Dangerous Game'

    3231 Words  | 13 Pages

    Samantha Jernigan English 9 Mrs.Watkins November 7th 2014 Values change based on influences and who you are Values do change based on influences, people believe that people don’t change but i see it differently. I believe that if somebody wants to change they will, I believe that influences change people,this is not all people a lot of people will never change but if you get influenced or you want to change it is possible.

    Read More

  • Characterization In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

    961 Words  | 4 Pages

    In “The most dangerous game” written by, Richard Connell, he uses many devices such as: characterization, plot structure and theme to contribute to the overall meaning of the story. Characterization is a big part of the overall meaning of the story which is that survival is of those who are smart, cunning, and can adapt to their environment. The protagonist Rainsford is at a constant battle with the antagonist General Zaroff. Throughout the entire short story they both have similar minds sets and then farther along the main character 's mind set develops into something more. The reader can almost sense a self centeredness, and that he believes that there are only two type of people in this world, “the hunters and the huntees”, and he believes that he is the hunter.

    Read More

  • The Most Dangerous Game Essay

    1201 Words  | 5 Pages

    I believe that the title of the story “The Most Dangerous Game“ written by Richard Connell is linked to us as human beings, and that the title is saying that humans are the most dangerous game. For example in The Most Dangerous Game we learn that on the night Rainsford meets general Zaroff we get a lot of information about Zaroff 's ideal game to hunt. "I wanted the ideal animal to hunt," explained the general. "So I said, `What are the attributes of an ideal quarry? ' And the answer was, of course, `It must have courage, cunning, and, above all, it must be able to reason."

    Read More

  • The Most Dangerous Game Research Paper

    519 Words  | 3 Pages

    "The Most Dangerous Game" statement of The world is made up of two classes -- "the hunters and the huntees" is a great statement that makes sense. The Most Dangerous Game is about a man named Zaroff who lives on an island by himself. The people that come to the island get trained to get ready for the game. The game involves people going through the jungle, hiding from Zaroff as he hunts them. Both the hunters and the huntees have a different view on the conflict.

    Read More

More about Value Of Human Life In The Most Dangerous Game By Kenneth Feinberg

Open Document