Through exploring the pursuit of knowledge in three different areas of knowledge: the arts, history and the natural sciences, it becomes apparent, that although to different extents, perspective is essential in shaping each. The Arts is considered a subjective area of knowledge and thus meaning is derived heavily through the perspective
“Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge.” Answering this question requires the exploration of the initial statement: ““Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” This exploration will lead to the acceptance of this initial statement as being valid but not in many cases. The two areas of knowledge that shall be used throughout this essay to support my claim are: mathematics and the social sciences. The role applied knowledge plays in mathematics and social sciences is crucial because it has resulted in numerous discoveries to occur, most of which has benefited man-kind. Before I get more into depth with
Knowledge claims are constantly being produced, all with varying content and significance. However, certain knowledge is considered to be more valuable than others. We believe that knowledge that is produced with difficulty is intrinsically superior to knowledge that is reached more easily. And while I do agree with his, I do so under the notion that we assess the difficulty of production of knowledge differently in different areas of knowledge and even within these areas themselves. It is also important to consider what our the valuing of knowledge looks like across different areas.
Theory of Knowledge Essay “Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge. In contemporary society, it is often argued that the value of knowledge is determined by its application to the real life situations. I am of an emphatic opinion that without application, the value of knowledge certainly abates. This essay will discuss the statement with the aid of Mathematics and Natural sciences as the two areas of knowledge. The reason that attracted me to discuss this knowledge question is that it was the title that evoked the most reaction and emotion from me.
It is the way we gain knowledge that shapes what we know rather than the knowledge itself. It is all about the way we understand and interpret things for that knowledge is known to be transitory. The term ‘knowledge’ is an extremely vast concept and it is not to be seen as an end product. To know something means to have a specific understanding of a certain subject. Purpose is what gives us an emotive or solid aim.
Does knowledge only add value to our academic pursuits, or can it enriches our lives in all different aspects? Can knowledge be purchased or is it built through experience and input? Humans have been haunted by these rhetorical questions that define our lives. In my essay, there are two kinds of knowledge; subjective and objective. Subjective knowledge is based on personal perspective, assumptions, or beliefs.
People learn things every day, through the activities they participate in. They pick up new skills and knowledge. The knowledge people gain is in relation to experience. True knowledge stems from experience. One can directly experience something and learn from it, and pass on the experience to others to spread knowledge.
One makes the claim that knowledge is used everyday for it to be applied to the world. I will discuss this through the areas of knowledge mathematics and history, with relation to the light-particle theory vs. light-wave theory debate as my real life situation. Firstly, it is important to determine what value knowledge has with application. The value of knowledge can be defined as its ability to be shared. The use of personal knowledge, whether it be abolition or implementation, influences the creation of shared knowledge.
One can gain knowledge by reviewing and reflecting on information one possesses. You cannot have knowledge without information; and once knowledge is obtained, understandings about that area are formed through new ideas. Ambiguity also plays a part in knowledge acquisition and understanding as information can be understood in many possible ways. Given access to the same facts, how is it possible that there can be disagreement between experts in a discipline? Many people might think with the same fact comes a certain fixed conclusion among experts, but surprisingly, there is often not one answer to questions regarding knowledge.