Value Of Knowledge Essay

The value of knowledge can only be determined if it is applied in real life, which means conveying it to the world. The value depends on people’s opinions, and in order for that to happen, it must be applied in the world. Without it, there is absolutely no way of deciding whether that knowledge is valuable or not. The absence of application in the real world would result in that knowledge’s value to be excessively reduced or may even result it to be nonexistent. Especially in the Areas of Knowledge such as The Arts and Natural Sciences, conveying knowledge is essential when it comes to regulating its value and importance to society. Many problems are solved by applying knowledge, which reinforces its value, therefore, if no knowledge is applied, there’s no way of perceiving its effect, hence

Some might say that the value of knowledge depends on who judged that knowledge. As I stated, the application of knowledge is essential for its value to remain paramount. However, it can be argued that this knowledge’s value still largely depends on its relevance to the knower. The value of knowledge is very subjective. For example, an English teacher is only required to have basic knowledge of Mathematics and have very little use of it as well. The English teacher would not be responsible for teaching mathematical knowledge such as Pythagoras's theorem, therefore, that knowledge would somewhat be meaningless to that teacher. This mathematical knowledge is not used within their profession nor in their career of becoming a successful English teacher, accordingly, they wouldn’t have to apply it in the world, even though the knowledge itself is valuable to the Area of Knowledge of Mathematics. Basically, the value of a knowledge may be significant to someone while it may not be to another. Perhaps, to a literate or philosopher, the knowledge might not be valuable, however, for a scientist or mathematician it may