1. There are some major problems within the vet colleges’ dissection policy. These problems need to be fixed. Therefore, the vet colleges should make changes to their dissection policy. People are getting attached to animals that students are dissecting. This is one major conflict. The vet colleges are making unethical decisions. To fix this issue, the vet colleges should change the animals that are being dissected.
2. The case study packet states, “Horses and cows are purchased for dissecting.” According to www.peta.org, research has shown that a significant number of students are uncomfortable with the use of animals in dissection. Among pet owners, 73% own a dog. Therefore, they would contribute to the disagreement to the dissection of dogs.
…show more content…
Evidence shows people are doing harmful things to these animals in order for them to be dissected. Undercover investigations have documented cases of animal abuse. Dealer and biological supply companies buy live or dead animals that have been captured off the streets. This is why large amounts of students feel uncomfortable with the use of animals in dissection. This proves that there should be a change in animals that are used. In addition, cows and horses are being bought from slaughterhouses. After that, they are being dissected. Because of the harm towards these animals, students disagree with the dissection policy.
4. Regardless of the animal, the dissection will still be done in the same way. It will not make a difference depending on what animal is being dissected, and how it is being dissected. Despite the fact that people don’t want animals, such as dogs, to be dissected, they might be more of a help to vets. If they always dissected rats or mice, they would never find problems in dogs or cows. Since many people own common animals like dogs, horses, and cows, dissections need to be done on them in order to find any problems in them. As a result of this, vet colleges should not make any changes to their dissection
Thesis There is a growing consent that factory farming of animals or concentrated animal feeding operations is morally
The meat industry likes to portray to the consumers happy farm animals grazing in fields, having happy lives, and long futures: however, nothing could be further from the truth. Every second innocent animals are being sent to slaughterhouses to be killed in such cruel and inhumane ways. The torture that goes down in slaughterhouses is something the meat industry does not want the consumers to find out. Farm animals that go to slaughterhouses are beaten, broiled, and dismembered alive by impatient, careless workers. Employees at slaughterhouses need to be immediately stopped.
The animals suffered poorly for human’s tastes. Companies will do anything to the animals, “ ...a worker demonstrated the method for euthanizing underweight piglets: taking them by the hind legs and smashing their skulls against the concrete floor…” (Genoways). Animals have to endure a lot of pain before they died. Moreover, companies must demand to regulate the amount of animals they produce. Since, “Workers at the Willmar Poultry Company—the country's largest turkey hatchery, producing 45 million birds a year—were filmed by HSUS undercover activists throwing sick, injured, and surplus birds into grinding machines while still alive” (Genoways).
The biggest reason of those who are against dissection is animal rights. Behavioral studies of diverse animals shown that some animals, including dogs, magpies, and elephants, while not as advanced as humans, animals do have a sense of self-awareness. If some
Dealers only need to be inspected once per year, which is unacceptable. Although dissection is often about frogs and rats, there were more than 6,000 dogs used for testing, nearly 7,500 chimpanzees, and even 2,700 cats. For those who have to process these animals, it is not uncommon for a severe hatred of dissection to develop simply because they are exposed to the deaths so much. Also, only 5% of animals that are used for experiments of any kind are protected by Animal Welfare communities. There are few foreign control measures in place to determine how animals are obtained.
However, animal activists shouldn’t be the only people concerned about this issue. Any carnivorous human taking part in the consumption of these slaughterhouse animals may want to know more about it as well. Animal activists, while presumably solely concerned with the comfort and well being of the animal, have provided a window into the world of slaughterhouses, and have, inadvertently or not, revealed a truth: The inhumane treatment and virtual torturous living environment of animals in slaughterhouses not only hurts the animal, but the humans who eat them as well. While the green fields and pretty red barns on the
Even if they are stunned, some may still be conscious when they are being dismembered. Ethically, Australia’s method of slaughtering animals is better because the animals then do not feel the
In addition, there are also regulations regarding the secure disposal of corpses, especially on pest wildlife that may carry infections. Some countries even require the cadaver be placed at a particular facility or location, or limit the manner of its disposal. The question, therefore, is if you are really decided on killing a possum. It is understandable that many individuals may be overly keen on killing a possum without taking a look at the whole drawbacks, as well as issues, connected to the act.
The both sides of this topic are very controversial because there are many opinions about this and in this essay i will explain the both sides and in between of the argument. Between the arguments of animals being experimented on and animals being people who are our pets; there is a major controversial conflict about it. In the article, “Eating Animals the Nice Way.” by Jeff McMahan, he states, “Many people are opposed to factory farming because of the terrible suffering it inflicts on animals, yet see no
About 6-12 million animals are killed for dissection annually in the US. Some schools use “ethically sourced” animals, including by-products of the food industry, like pigs, or cats that were euthanized in shelters. However, the most commonly used animal used in dissection labs, frogs, are raised specifically to be killed and sent to schools for dissection. Sharks and many varieties of fish that have been captured and killed are also sold biological supply companies for money. (Dissection in the classroom).
Another problem occurring with this is unless people like dissecting and killing animals your rate of getting workers would be low and since for certain experiments you actually need government approval unless you were doing this behind there back but, when doing that you would get caught, have your business shut down and lastly probably go into custody for your
Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.
Abstract Human life is precious, then how about animals? Ending human life is considered as unethical and this is against the law. However, this does not apply to animals. Even though most families treat their animals as part of their family members, animal euthanasia is still a controversial issue nowadays. Millions of dogs are euthanized in each year and several methods are used by the veterinarian to put the animal to death.
There are other scientific methods that can replace animal usage. Recently, scientists have found techniques to test out medical cures. One possible use is to take human tissue
Animals should not be used in experiments for medical research. Many products that are sold in stores may have been tested on animal which could have either killed or seriously injured these defenseless, poor creatures. Some chemicals that we eat that are listed as ingredients on boxes of food were first tested on