9 In what ways did the Treaty of Versailles punish Germany? When Germany surrendered, they knew they had to pay a price, but the peace treaty was more severe than they expected. British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau and American President Woodrow Wilson, the three leaders of the Allies, decided the fate of Germany. The Treaty
On 11 November 1918, Germany finally surrendered .They then received a lot of consequences such as the treaty of Versailles. However, was it inevitable that Germany will lose in World War One? In the following paragraphs, we are going to talk about some of the reasons for Germany’s failure. Some reasons show that Germany was actually taking less advantage in the war, but some reasons show that Germany deserved the failure due to their wrong and daring planning. Think about it for a little more.
That’s when the Treaty of Versailles came into play. The Treaty of Versailles, which was signed as a peace settlement after World War 1, consisted of many positive and negative factors, but there were definitely more negative factors. In fact, some of the factors played a very significant role in history, especially against Germany and their historical timeline. The Treaty was created for peace between Germany and the Allied powers, France, Britain, and the United States of America, but it more or less created even more political conflict and economic disarray in Germany. The Treaty of Versailles is actually a very fine epitome of situational irony, for it was meant to cause peace after a battle, but basically started a whole other battle itself, just over controversial
If they did, the judgements would have been less biased and unfair. At the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, German didn’t have the ability to voice their opinion. It is stated in the Why Did World War I Just End Article of the conference that “stripped Germany of its colonies overseas and the region of Alsace-Lorraine (now part of France), placed restrictions on its military and levied punitive damages for supposedly starting what was, at the time, the most destructive war the world had ever seen.” If Germany had a say, do you think that they would agree to these circumstances? When a judge is at a case and they are deciding who is guilty and what their punishment will be, they listen to both sides of the story. This wasn’t the case for the Paris Peace Conference.
Which didn’t bring the German people much joy as his way of dealing with the aftermath of WW1 was revenge paid in all what Germany had to offer. Clearly disregarding how Germany would manage as well as the impact it would have on the future generations of Germans. The unreasonableness of the Treaty is what caused the Germans to suffer, causing them to want change, which resulted in anger and what the English PM Lloyd George feared, revenge. President Wilson had a great plan that would not only would bring all the countries together and have them independent as well as being capable of building a future they want. His plan focused on giving the countries in Europe what they wanted as well as being fair.
The Holocaust was supposed to be nameless. Hitler had become a chancellor in January 1933 but the people did not want him as thier chancellor (Colbert 2) The Natzis killed 11 million people in total and 6 million Jews were dead and the population was hit so much it almost decreased half the population (Metzer 89). At last the Germans surrendered and ended World War 2 on May 8th and let peace arise (Metzer
The circumstances that led up to the Holocaust was the Treaty of Versailles after the Germans lost in WW1. Germany was blamed for the war and were subject to pay very heavy reparations; the cause of these heavy reparations put Germany in a very bad state economically. Due to all of this, Hitler preached that the Jews were to blame and he promised to fix Germany during his political race for leader of Germany. An unmotivated Germany believed Hitler and did everything to elect him because of his very convincing speeches to make Germany a vast and dominating empire once again. The Jews lived very hard lives after the election of Hitler; they were subject to very harsh ways of life and it started out with the release of the Nuremberg Laws.
Hitler’s organisation skills and personal traits helped to bring the Naizs into power. However, without the socio-economic problems that Germany encountered and the weakness of their political situation, Hitler would not have had the opportunity to come into power and destory democracy in 1933. In 1918, a republic was announced with the socialist Frederich Ebert as chancellor. Ebert wanted to sign the armistice with allies (Tonge, 2009 p.50). In 1919, the Treaty of Versailles was signed and article 231 of the treaty blamed the whole of the First World War on Germany.
One major problem that was occuring was the quick falling German government which would greatly affect the economy of the entire world. This is one of the effects of not clearly hearing what the Germans needed in peace talks. Someone might counter this claim by saying that the reason why it seems like countries don’t get a say in some things is because what they have to offer is
Human beings need to reflect on that terrifying disaster. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze how Hitler realizes his plan step by step and the analysis will be carried out from Hitler’s boldness and caution decision with psychological tactics. Psychological tactics can completely change a person invisibly; Hitler grasped the public’s psychology and changed their minds and actions little by little. After the World War I, German political is instability; people are accustomed to the change of political situation. As a defeated country, Germans feel humiliated and the public have a negative attitude towards the government.