In this reflection includes my comprehension of the concepts included in the statement, my experience to clarify it.
In the interaction with westerners, Face-saving/ Face- threatening related to Association Rights is not the most a matter of concern to Vietnamese, but their most fear is threats to interpersonal harmony, as well as Cheng & Starosta (2005) point out
“Human communication is a holistic system by which people develop and maintain harmonious relationships in a continuous transforming process of mutual dependency. This model of communication, which is clearly embedded in Eastern thought, […] is essentially different from common Western approaches because it holds harmony as the end rather than the means of communication”.
The statement
…show more content…
Association rights refers to the emotional exchange in interpersonal interaction.to Vietnamese the need to keep association with someone is dominate the need of time saving – The prevalence of orientation towards association over time orientation. In my case, when we had a chance to study with American teacher, we preferred to ask him about his life, his experience, his feelings in Vietnam than focus on discussing about the lesson topic, one day he showed his feeling which made us disappointed, he said he just wanted to talk about the lesson content, not the irrelevant thing during the time in classroom. We thought that we just want to get close by knowing more about his life which is normal with Vietnamese culture who freely share with us a lot of thing about his life in the classroom. We didn’t meet in using time, the foreign teacher wanted to spend the class time to the class works.The other idea which I have no experience is the philosophy “time is money” from the example on page 114. It’s the story of employee didn’t feel good when her foreign boss paid money for her time of extra work. She claimed that he didn’t care of the emotional aspects. Vietnamese and Westerners contrast in view of time which may break their relationship.The other aspect is Association rights dominate the
The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and
“Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence” Rhetorical Analysis Over the years there have been many great speeches said by very good orators, but few of them had the effect that Martin Luther King, Jr. had on his audience, and none were as famous as his “I Have A Dream” speech. What made Dr. King’s speech so compelling was the fact that he was preacher and was very good at capturing the audience’s attention. The way he presented his arguments to captivate the audience and to get them to agree with whatever he was saying was a technique called the Aristoliean rhetoric, a device that helped him persuade his audience to accomplish his goals. But when he made the “Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence” speech on April 4, 1967, it was not recognized
In nursing school, students were introduced to the idea of cultural competence. It is a concept that I am familiar with due to my cultural background. Being respectful and aware of the beliefs and values of other traditions cannot be neglected and ignored. We are all global citizens that hold different views and perspectives, therefore leaders must equip themselves with the understanding that people expect and will act differently based on their cultural beliefs.
The essay “Asian Problems” presents the struggle that an asian in America encounters because of the many differences these cultures posses. The author points out how moving to the United States was a big transition. He also exposes how his americanization led to problems with his parents. The fact that they are traditional and their views are based on their culture creates a difference among him and his parents. The liberty in America caused many issues with the way they saw his son’s actions.
A similar cultural conflict within family is coming about because of “language barriers” which happens in the “Chill with Us” scene when Thao is confronted by a Mexican gang while walking down a street close to his home. Thao’s cousin and his fellow Hmong gang members save him and insist that Thao ride with them as compensation. Thao understands his cousin, in both English and Chinese, however, their cultures are immensely different. Thao does not fully comprehend his cousin’s gang culture, thus, does not comprehend the significance of his words, “Chill with us, man” (Eastwood, 2008). In addition, the value within these words are deeply felt beliefs that are shared by a cultural group that Thao did not understand the full significance
However, people must listen to each other, no matter anyone’s opinion, since that’s how new ideas are created, how people come together, and how people become educated. The way people are able to create distinct ideas in the world is by communicating and in return listening. If someone was to truly ponder about how things have been created, they would realize that it takes communication. For example, if someone
“Love and Honor and Pity and Pride and Compassion and Sacrifice” Nam Le’s “Love and Honor and Pity and Pride and Compassion and Sacrifice” is categorized in “ethnic story” narrated his Vietnamese life in order to meet an upcoming deadline even though finally he can’t submit his story because his father burns his work. Throughout the story, Nam the narrator talks about “the past” which he experiences when he was young including the recent experience that he has got from his father reunion. Not only does the story tell us about the past which, but it also shows a connection of time between past, present, and future. Likewise, the story shows the relationship between son and father which is the main theme of this story; and shows how the past is important and affect to them differently. Also, the story of the past could lead to the end of the story that can be interpreted like a prediction of the direction of their relationship in the future.
Martin Luther King Jr. was a social activist that led the Civil Rights Movement, and other movements until his assassination in 1968. On April 4, 1967 Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a speech named, “Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence” addressing the Vietnam War. The United States got involved in the Vietnam War because they wanted to stop the spread of communism. Due to the Vietnam War is that plenty of individuals, both Americans and Vietnamese were killed.
“Divergent perceptions and absence of a common language of communication ... they fail to fathom each other’s feelings and likes and dislikes” (Priya). Miscommunication between people creates rifts and lays pretense for tension and dispassion. Without communication, people become impatient and disassociate. “They see daughters who grow impatient when their mothers talk in Chinese, who think they are stupid when they explain things in fractured English”(Tan 31).
I learned the key to positive relationships and the cause and remedies of defensiveness. In module number twelve, I wrote three letters to three different people and observed their reactions, and I noticed that there are a lot of difference in their response because of the culture difference and the different relationship between us. Finally, I want to say that this interview assignment really made a difference in my future human service professional training. It helps me to guard against inaccurate perceptions of people and be prepared to gain multi-culture competence in the future.
CULTIVATING REFLECTION-IN-ACTION & REFLECTION-ON-ACTION Reflection is loosely defined as the way we learn from an experience in order to understand and develop practice. Reflection is a means of processing thoughts and feelings about an incident, and gives us a chance to come to terms with our thoughts and feelings about it. For example, if something did not go the way you wanted it, we would tend to reflect on it by asking ourselves questions such as why did it go wrong and how did it go wrong. John Dewey’s theory of Reflective Practice John Dewey (1933) was among the first to identify reflection as a specialised form of thinking.
Other forms of communication also appear, such as Vashti’s monologue-like lectures. The various forms of communication are similar in the way that they usually end abruptly and unharmoniously. The unresolved
The two key topics in class in the last weeks, for me. Two of the most relevant topics developed in the last weeks were: non-verbal communication and the barriers to communication. Everytime we communicate with another person or group of people, we have to take into account some factors other than what we are actually saying that can affect how the message is going to be received: body language, tone, intonation, facial expressions, and others; this is what we understand for non-verbal communication. As we saw in class “55% of communication is body language, 38% is the tone of voice, and 7% is the actual words spoken.”
In society today, communication classes are highly over looked because of our new developing technology. People don’t realize how much a communication class could benefit them. We have lost sight of verbal communication skills. This class has taught me to put my phone down and communicate with others. It has opened my eyes to the real world without technology.
What Tenzin mean when he says this communication with others is how we avoid conflict. If people talk about problems before they get uncontrollable unnecessary conflict won’t occur. When people listen to other people’s opinions it can form relationships that are stable and peaceful. Someone that agrees with this concept is Portuguese politician José Manuel Barroso. He once stated, “There is no stability without solidarity and no solidarity without stability.”