A paper of Truong Quang and Nguyen Tai Vuong, 2002, about “Management Styles and Organisational Effectiveness in Vietnam” painted a clear picture about some particular qualities in Vietnamese culture. Vietnam is famous for its’ tradition which has been evolved over 4000 years. As usual, Vietnamese people are well-known for their hospitably and hard-working. Following the words of Hofstede, 1980, this paper described Vietnamese culture as “high power distance, high collectivism, moderate uncertainty avoidance, and high context (Swierczek, 1994, Quang, 1997; Ralston et al., 1999)”.
“High power distance” is shown in the day-to-day life of Vietnamese people and in their business world, the paper said. For the everyday life, children in the Vietnamese
…show more content…
The harmony in an organization is the most important for Vietnamese people. They also try to never lose the others’ face and desire to have a “win-win” position at the end.
Vietnamese people are not the type of risk lovers. They do not like the unclear circumstances, thus they supply many stable job positions, set up more official regulations, and try to deny different thinkings or activities that most people not considered to be normal or accepted.
As saying before, the culture has a big impact on the way leaders behave in different countries. After knowing some features of Vietnamese culture, this section will talk about some common characteristics of Vietnamese leaders, including “decision making, communication pattern, control mechanism, and interdepartmental relationship", following the paper of Truong Quang and Nguyen Tai Vuong, 2002.
The first one is “decision making”. One of the prevalent trait of Vietnamese leaders is that they rarely motivate or support the involvement of employees in decision making procedure. Maybe because the Vietnamese leaders set a
…show more content…
Because the application varies from one company to another, this part will discuss the differences among public, private and joint venture Vietnamese companies, based on the result of the survey done by Truong Quang and Nguyen Tai Vuong, 2002. The survey carried out with enterprises in Northern Vietnam, thus public, private and joint venture companies mentioned here are located in the north of Vietnam.
The public companies were disclosed to use authoritative leadership styles, where the system was planned centralized. These leaders use tough control, prefer explicit communication and relationship. They want to give instructions for the followers to make sure the work done well, hence they rarely provide freedom for employees to decide and ask the subordinates for opinions before making their decisions.
The authoritarian style is quite the same as the “familial” style, which is prevailed in private companies. However, the familial style concerns a bit more about the interest of people than the authoritative style. According to the
Seth Marshall Professor: Messersmith Comp 2 2/22/16 Different Leadership Styles All people have different opinions on how a leader should handle things. Such as war, people, poverty, and even themselves. Both Machiavelli in “The qualities of the prince” talks about on how a prince is supposed to be a leader and that good leaders must learn not to be convenient or compassionate to keep stability. Lao Tzu in “Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching” believes in having a silent leader so the people will do what he wants them to do and fill like they are not being guided.
1955 marked the beginning of a devastating war that Vietnam was about to face. The war politically divided the Northern and Southern regions of the country. Although many may comprehend the battles between the rise of communism or capitalism, the effects on families and ways in which they overcame such harsh situations are often overlooked. Instead, wars are frequently represented through statistics and lists of chronological events. It is important to comprehend these wars on a more personal level.
In this part of the project, I chose to take actual field trip to Little Saigon, which is the heart of Vietnamese community in the United States of America. However, before I took I actual trip, I had chosen to look up some official information regarding Vietnamese community and why they moved to the United States so that I have an overview about my topic. After the Vietnam War ended in April 30, 1975, hundred thousands of Southern Vietnamese people fled to America with the hope to find a new, safe place for their settlement. Taking responsibility for being involved in the Vietnam War, American Congress passed different Acts such as the Indochina Refugee Act in 1975, the Refugee Act in 1980, and the Amerasian Homecoming Act in order to aid
From little to nothing, the Vietnamese had achieve the impossible, they built a new homeland in America. Though as Tony Lam, the first Vietnamese American elected to U.S. public office, explains it, “We never had any grand plan, we were just trying to survive, run our business and support our
“Authoritarian leadership is a leadership style in which the leader dictates and controls all decisions in the group and task. Often referred to as Autocratic leadership, authoritarian leadership is about control, organization and discipline and while it still has a place in the leader’s toolbox, it was regarded as the most prominent style almost one hundred years ago.” (from http://www.educational-business-articles.com/authoritarian-leadership/). These two leadership styles go hand in hand. As said in the article, the authoritative leadership style has been around for over a hundred years and was known as the most dominant style but in the system that Roger Goodell is in, this will not work.
She suggests that in order to retain their Vietnamese identity, Vietnamese Americans use elements of the physical domain as well as social relationships to reflect and preserve their Vietnamese histories. For ten years beginning in 1994, Juan conducted interviews with Vietnamese American living in Boston and Orange County. Her goal is to understand how Vietnamese refugees maintain a sense of being Vietnamese. The stories she collected while interviewing residents are included in her book and helped her with her conclusion.
Regardless of what position of leadership one may have, a leader must make decisions which may affect many people. Leadership is a place where spontaneous acts damage, rather than help the outcome of a particular task. Good leaders must think things thoroughly and come to best possible solutions for all. A great example for this type of situation would be the President of the United States. If the President were to be infuriated by another Nation’s acts, the President might at that very moment feel like his office should send troops to that nation or drop bombs.
Daniel Goleman’s article: Leadership that gets results, is from the Harvard Business School archives. Daniel Goleman is the noted author of the book Emotional Intelligence. He thus combines his findings in emotional intelligence with research on leadership styles done by Hay/McBer. The research displays 6 leadership styles. The author does not conclude that there is one best style, on the other hand stating that the best leaders practice each of these styles or at least a number of these styles multiple times in each week.
(Cherry, 2016) Autocratic leaders normally settle on decisions in view of their thoughts, ideas and judgments and rarely acknowledge guidance or advice from followers. Autocratic leadership includes absolute, authoritarian control over a gathering. primary characteristics of autocratic leadership include, practically no contribution from members, group leaders manage all the work method, strategies and procedures, group members are infrequently trusted with choices or important assignments or tasks and lastly leaders settle on the choices and decisions. Autocratic leadership can be advantageous at times but there are additionally many occasions where this style can be problematic.
C) Provide the senior managers of Alphabet Games with a set of guidelines to follow that would enable them to carry out an effective SWOT analysis. Provide guidelines of SWOT analysis. We can define SWOT Analysis as a strategic planning tool utilized to evaluate the Threats, Weaknesses, Strengths , and Opportunities involved in a business venture or in a project or in or in any other case of an organization or individual to pursuit of an objective it must requiring a good decision. It includes observing the advertising environment, interior and outer to the person or company.
Employees are allowed to make their own decisions but the leaders are still responsible for the final outcome. It is because of employee confidence that there is no requirement for central coordination. More recently, Judge and Piccolo (2004) indicated that that leaders who scored high on laissez-faire leadership scales avoid making decisions, hesitate in taking action, and are absent when
Therefore, management is important and very much needed. The Authoritarian, Democratic, and Laissez management style are all different and all effective depending on the situation. If one style or approach is not successful when resolving and issue, another style is available to eliminate a hostile situation from
This paper is going to encompass different leadership theories and their relevance to my own personal personality and method of leadership. There will be information on the advantages and disadvantages of the leadership theories and information on each including examples. The purpose of this paper is to view various kinds of leadership theories and apply them to a real-life scenario. Leadership Theories There are quite a few different leadership theories available for people to take information from and use in business settings and even personal settings.
According to Hofstede’s cultural framework, the key drivers of Chinese culture, and in the context of this case, in organizations such as JPM are as discussed below: Power Distance This aspect deals with the fact that all individuals in societies are not equal – it expresses
Experienced and trained employees that require little or no supervision falls under the laissez-faire leadership style. This leadership style affects a group success in that if the group is doing something wrong there is no feedback from management to make corrections since management do not directly supervise them and would led mistakes being made continuously. ● Autocratic- This leadership style managers makes all decisions with the input of others.