Views On Kurt Bier's 'Meaning Of Life'
FINAL THIRD PAPER ON MEANING OF LIFE (Question 7)
According to Baier, why he thought that theistic responses are problematic, first, he believes that the biblical explanations of our universe often simply false and not true. Second, he thinks that the explanations of the universe are incomprehensive or absurd. Third, he also believes that Christianity lowers evaluation of earth’s existence, which he thinks is the main problem of the belief in the meaninglessness of Life which however, rests on the use of unjustifiable high standard of judgement.
Also he believes that, theism is morally unacceptable, and so God is basically using us to fulfill his purpose of creation. Thereby, reducing us to mere means and also fails to rest each person in
…show more content…
Therefore, truth and falsity can be determined with a high degree of probability. He added that science also supplies for many more purposes capable of realization.
Therefore, according to Kurt Baier, the Christian worldview and the scientific approach agree on criteria but differ on evaluation of human life. However, our lives have meaning without a higher being. In other words, we can abandon Christianity and adapt a scientific worldview. Because, Kurt Baier believes that biblical explanations of the universe are false. And also the explanations of the whole universe are incomprehensible.
Therefore, he believes that the Christianity's thoughts and idea of life rests on an "unjustifiably high standard of judgement." Since Science tells us "how," not "why." Baier, also believes that religion gives meaning by linking the universe. Whereas teleological explanation provides answers to "Why?" as well as which shows reasoning for doing something based on background that provides explanation, example "I exist" and causal explanations, provides answers to "How?" and so
Comparing Einstein's Letter To Phyllis Wright
253 Words | 2 PagesIn his letter answering sixth-grade student Phyllis Wright’s question of whether scientists pray, Albert Einstein employs purposeful logos and diction to successfully distinguish the religiosity of true scientists from that others. Einstein logically builds his distinction by asserting that “a research scientist will hardly believe ... [in] prayer” and subsequently revealing that experienced scientists nevertheless develop a religious devotion towards “a spirit vastly superior to that of man.” This explicit presentation of the similarities and differences makes it clear how the scientists’ concepts of piety differ from conventional beliefs. Henceforth, Wright would conceptualize Einstein’s beliefs as a variation from the beliefs she is familiar
Rationalism In Rudolf Otto's The Idea Of The Holy
1021 Words | 5 PagesThe human mind’s ability and innate desire to justify and explain the world and its phenomena has led to some of the most significant and world-altering discoveries and inventions, illustrated throughout the renaissance, enlightenment, scientific revolution, and industrial revolution. Logical pursuits comprise a significant capstone of human nature and progress. However, according to Rudolf Otto in The Idea of the Holy, these tendencies have created different dimensions of religion; the rational and non-rational, with the latter often times overlooked. The most significant difference between the rational and non-rational aspects of religion deal with their respective emphasis on reason and feeling. Rudolph Otto prioritizes the non-rational as offering a truer understanding of religion because he claims the core of all religious life revolves around experiences and feeling, not simply rational thought.
Darrel R Falk Chapter Summary
818 Words | 4 PagesThroughout this book the author, Darrel R. Falk, argues from his personal journey as a professing evangelical Christian and biologist, that only science, and not scripture, can reveal the details of creation. In the first chapter, the author talks about how, when one is living with both science and religion; it is like trying to live in two worlds at once. Falk spoke about how he grew up in a church that taught a literal view of Genesis, but those in leadership were not equipped to answer his questions about contradictions between the Bible and the real world. For this reason, Faulk drifted away from Christianity towards a life studying biology. Eventually he
The Perimeter Of Ignorance By Neil Degrasse Tyson
743 Words | 3 PagesThe issue on whether religion and science can work together has been debatable for centuries. Neil DeGrasse Tyson in his article the Perimeter of Ignorance argues that science and religion cannot coexist. In his article, the author explains that religion is all about the Bible and the Bible primarily focuses on the explanation of the origin of the world. He puts forth the point that this concept is far different from what science is and that they do not complement each other. This essay intends to prove that religion and science can work together with no issues.
Summary Of Galileo's Letter To Grand-Duchess Christina '
456 Words | 2 PagesHe points out that the Bible cannot be taken literally because sometimes it can be interpreted in different ways. The Bible was written for the common people and illiterate to understand, and to prove his point he mentions that the Bible gives God a body like ours while theologies believe God has no such features. He moves to his main point about who has the authority to determine what is true and untrue. He argues that what is scientifically proven will to understand the Bible true meaning.
Difference Between Christianity And Naturalism
981 Words | 4 PagesInstead the belief revolves around the idea that natural causes are sufficient to explain everything that exists in the
Analysis Of The Surgeon As Priest
767 Words | 4 PagesWhile the science versus faith argument has existed for centuries, only rarely do they ever work hand in hand. Richard Selzer, author of The Surgeon as Priest, breaks the barrier and explores the contrast between the two ideas, likening them, while breaking his piece into five distinct parts to help himself and the reader analyze it. Selzer uses process analysis, transition between first, second, and third person perspective, a plethora of literary techniques, as well as evocative syntax and diction to explore the conflict between religious anomalies and scientific conviction to propose his purpose, discussing in an almost interrogative fashion - when does zeal become iniquity? To start off his essay, Selzer begins talking directly to the
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis
2349 Words | 10 PagesThis paper will discuss the problem of evil. In the first part, I will discuss Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s atheist stance and William Lane Craig’s theist stance on the problem of evil. In the final part of this paper, I will argue that Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s argument is stronger. The Problem of Evil
Science And Religion In Cat's Cradle Essay
1452 Words | 6 Pages“All of the true things I am about to tell you are shameless lies.” That is how Bokonon, the founder of Bokononism, says his religion is in Cat’s Cradle. For the people of San Lorenzo, this Bokononism a way for them to save them from the cruel science of the world. For others, this religion is nothing but lies and illusion. Yet, throughout Vonnegut's book, Cat’s Cradle, seemingly asks the question of whether or not science and religion are really separated or rather similar pieces to a puzzle.
The Pros And Cons Of Naturalism, Creationism And Existentialism
1022 Words | 5 PagesThere is a creator that has created life. As creator would not create things without meaning, life should have a meaning. This position has the same viewpoints of meaning of life as naturalism, which is the origin of life gives life a meaning. Baggini argued that the meaning of creator created life is not equal to our own life’s meaning, we should find our own meaning of life instead. Moreover, Creationism is related to faith, which has been seen as a risk by
Does The Bible Have To Control Our Own Destiny?
1295 Words | 6 PagesOnce a Christian endeavor, Science has relied upon itself to explain where we came from and if we are ultimately in control of our own destiny. Christianity also says has an explanation and that is the focus of this paper. What does the Bible have to say? What has the church said and believed regarding creation and providence?
Postmodernism Vs Christian Worldview Essay
571 Words | 3 PagesHistorical knowledge and science provide a point where biblical and cultural stories collide (Goheen & Bartholomew, p. 130). Culture is communicated through common stories and events. Science or the human desire to explain what is seen can be identified within Greek mythology throughout history to the postmodern views of today. The Christian worldview provides a basis for belief in a creator, not dependent on human action continue existence (Goheen & Bartholomew, p. 23). Scientific exploration and discovery is a part of God’s creation.
Galileo Vs Copernicus Dbq
795 Words | 4 PagesFrom the periods 1500 to 1700, The Scientific Revolution led to heretical ideas against the church. According to the bible, man was considered the pinnacle of creation as well as other creations such as the sun been considered the center of the universe. Copernicus aroused with the creation of the heliocentric theory, stating that the sun was not the center of the universe and Galileo “agreed with his teaching enabling him to understand nature’s phenomena that according to hypothesis, it remained inexplicable.” In addition, this theory challenged the church’s authority and beliefs. Throughout that time, because church was really strict, it decided to go against the theory, because it was contrary to what the church stands for, as well as questioning God.
Argumentative Essay On Science Vs Religion
943 Words | 4 PagesNicalea Greenlee Astronomy, 7 December 15, 2017 Science vs. Religion Science and religion has always been an argument for years. I think science and religion are both very important to the way of life and how we see the entire universe. But I believe religion is more believable than science. For science can be proven wrong at any given time and religion can never be stated untrue. Such as the story of creation, evolution, practices and beliefs can contradict these theories.
More about Views On Kurt Bier's 'Meaning Of Life'
Comparing Einstein's Letter To Phyllis Wright
253 Words | 2 PagesRationalism In Rudolf Otto's The Idea Of The Holy
1021 Words | 5 PagesDarrel R Falk Chapter Summary
818 Words | 4 PagesThe Perimeter Of Ignorance By Neil Degrasse Tyson
743 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Galileo's Letter To Grand-Duchess Christina '
456 Words | 2 PagesDifference Between Christianity And Naturalism
981 Words | 4 PagesMoving Up The Truth About Getting Ahead In America Summary
1274 Words | 6 PagesAnalysis Of The Surgeon As Priest
767 Words | 4 PagesWalter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis
2349 Words | 10 PagesScience And Religion In Cat's Cradle Essay
1452 Words | 6 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Naturalism, Creationism And Existentialism
1022 Words | 5 PagesDoes The Bible Have To Control Our Own Destiny?
1295 Words | 6 PagesPostmodernism Vs Christian Worldview Essay
571 Words | 3 PagesGalileo Vs Copernicus Dbq
795 Words | 4 PagesArgumentative Essay On Science Vs Religion
943 Words | 4 Pages