Justice can take many forms whether it’s receiving a punishment from one’s parents or coming to an agreement in court. However, the word justice is used so often and so freely that it can often be used wrong. According to the Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary, the definition of justice is, “The maintenance or administration of what is just esp. by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards and punishments” (“Justice”). This simply means that justice is protecting what is right by penalizing offenders, awarding heroes, and being unbiased when mediating disputes. This definition is actually quite accurate because it includes some of the most important components like protecting rights and remaining unbiased. In contrast, people miss use the word so that they can do …show more content…
This can lead to claims for justice against the offender. While these claims can lead to actual justice they are often twisted, so that the accuser has the upper hand. When this happens the accuser wants to get even and take “an eye for an eye.” This however is not justice but is simply vigilantism. Vigilantes believe they are above the law and attempt to get revenge if they feel the outcome of the situation was unjust. Vigilantes perceive their vengeance to be the only way to achieve justice because the government has failed to do so. This is an issue because it causes people to hide behind their crimes of revenge stating that it was just. The issue with claiming that their revenge is just is that they are not unbiased in the case. Even in the definition of justice it states that justice is achieved “by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims” (“Justice”). So, an important part of justice is making it fair for both parties which would be impossible if one party is the judge. To move on, vigilantes show that even with good intentions, it does not make them the
B. Restorative Justice There is some theoretical ambiguity in the meaning of Restorative Justice in spite of the many definitions and studies done on the subject. Restorative Justice has been defined as “an ethos with practical goals, among which to restore harm by including affected parties in a (direct or indirect) encounter and a process of understanding through voluntary and honest dialogue.” It is primarily concerned with the reinstatement of victims to life before the crime, restoration of the Offender to a well behaved and lawful life, restoration of the injury caused to the community and the creation of a better society in the present and the future. Restorative Justice is not easily defined because it covers a wide range of practices introduced at different stages of the criminal process, including diversion from prosecution, actions analogous with court decisions and meetings between victims and offenders at any stage of the criminal process. One widely-accepted definition of restorative justice was put forward by Tony Marshall which was also accepted by the United Nations Working Party on Restorative Justice, defined restorative justice as; “a process whereby all parties with a stake in a particular offence come together to resolve collectively how to deal with the aftermath of an offence and its implications for the future.”
People rebel when no justice being served. It is understandable why people act a certain way. Have you ever loved someone more than yourself? A person is your biggest pride and joy to be safe? Can you imagine how it feels to no longer have your pride and joy with in a split second, due to the way they look?
As seen in the examples above, society will do whatever it takes to solve “the bigger problem” even if it means burning the innocent. Society doesn’t stop to look back nor ahead to see the damages they’ve caused or are going to cause, they just throw the torch and wait for the town or people to fan the flame. In order for the scapegoating to come to an end, the people must first want it to end. The people must show they truly want it to stop and put forth the effort to bring scapegoating to an end no matter how bad the situation looks or is. “Under stress, a society will always scapegoat a person or a group of people” doesn’t have to be true, but unfortunately in most cases it is true and there are cartoons, plays, and poems to prove
The folk song ‘Vigilante Man’ by Woody Guthrie shows the confusion between criminals and vigilantes. We have all heard stories about vigilante men going around trying to make the world a better place. Sometimes people get confused because a vigilante can be seen as a hero and a villain. Guthrie describes the Vigilante Man “carry that sawed-off shot-gun in his hand? Would he shoot his brother and his sister down?”
In its most basic sense, justice is the concept of rewarding good and punishing evil. Although this concept seems simple, history has shown that it is by no means as black and white as one would think. In Boxers and Saints, a graphic novel set about the Boxer Rebellion in 1899, Gene Yang exemplifies that justice is indeed complicated. After finishing these graphic novels, readers are left with the question of whether justice is ever really achieved, and whether evil is always punished and good is always rewarded. Yang thoughtfully includes each character to show that justice is never perfect, and while justice can be achieved in some cases, in other situations it may not be.
(Christie) An example of vigilantism in Man Accused in Vigilante Case Charged With Murder is “Police also say Hernandez remorsefully admitted to the shooting, saying he only wanted to make a citizen 's arrest.” (Trujillo) These vigilantes are similar because they both believe in their own way they
King goes on to state, “Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.” This works because it gives these items something everyone can relate to or imagine. Like water, justice can be strong enough to change people. Justice is also natural and essential for people to thrive. And, finally, according to King, Justice is clear.
Americans want to investigate, judge, and punish fairly (Cole & Smith, 2011). Justice is defined as the proper administration of the law; fair and equitable treatment of all individuals under the law (Justice, 2008). As a society, there is a mutual agreement that justice should be done if a crime has been committed. According to Cole and Smith (2011), there are three goals of the criminal justice system: doing justice, controlling crime and preventing crime.
Justice can be seen when one commits a crime, or does something immoral, and there is Justice only when the convict receives his punishment. However, it is not just, if the punishment of a crime is unfair, or immoral. The punishment must always fit the crime, although many times it is a highly debatable topic. In the movie, when Ben Chapman, the other team 's manager, harassed Jackie Robinson, the baseball league did what was just, and fired Robinson. Another CNN article covers a case where a man who was caught after a school shooting, was proven guilty, and has gotten jail time.
“Justice consists not in being neutral between right and wrong, but in finding out the right and upholding it, wherever found against the wrong. ”(Theodore Roosevelt) To start off let’s talk about Hammurabi, a king not many people knew about. Thanks to clay writing tablets found by archaeologist, we know some things about him.
Injustice versus Justice in And Then There Were None Everyone has varying opinions on the definition of justice and injustice, and acts of which may be seen as fair or unfair to different individuals. A dictionary says that justice is the quality of being just; righteousness; equitableness; or moral rightness.
Throughout the history of mankind, society has defined itself by law and the order that law creates. “Laws are the binding rules of conduct or action which the vast majority of the society has to abide”. Justice on the other hand is rather an abstract concept. There is no right or wrong definition of justice, but is rather agreed upon the concept of being fair and equal. Many would assume that the sole purpose of law is to establish justice, which seems like a wonderful philosophical theory but is slightly difficult to follow.
Justice is derived from the root word just, meaning agreeing to what is considered morally right or good; treating people in a way that is morally right; or reasonable or proper. However, society has become so entangled up in the power which certain individuals possess, they forget all about what is “just”. The justice theory is that justice is at the advantage of the stronger. When an individual is described or depicted as being “strong”, that individual is typically of a larger build, possesses some sort of weapon that causes them to be mighty, and is typically large in size. No matter what circumstances arise, these individuals are expected to be victorious in each battle they fight.
Government officials are bought off and they dispense their own brand of justice. They have an act of religious, biblical sense of justice. As many have heard the expression “an eye for an eye,” but in this case it’s a body for a body. This tends to get out of control during the mob war. We see when Marlon Brando is the Don and his son gets gunned down, instead of acting vengeful, he realizes that the violence needs to stop.
The search for justice is never ending. Justice may be delayed, denied, or postponed, however, the search is timeless. To be just is to argue for fair rights for all. It is to be someone that will help the people of the community. However, many times justice is not sought and not given to those who need it most.